Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid Resorbable Sutures Are a Favourable Alternative to Non-resorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Rhinoplasty

  • Original Article
  • Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The open approach using inverted-V incisions has gained popularity in both primary and revision rhinoplasty during the last years. The risk of a disturbing columellar scar has been shown to be very low when meticulously closed. However, the suture extractions are usually painful and time consuming.

Objectives

To investigate if rapid resorbable sutures could replace non-resorbable sutures in nasal transcolumellar incisions. The present study compared (1) patient discomfort, (2) scarring and (3) risk for postoperative infection.

Materials and Methods

A total of 58 consecutive patients subjected to open rhinoplasty by the same surgeon using midcolumellar inverted-V incisions were investigated retrospectively. Forty-one (71 %) were eligible and investigated, of whom 27 (65 %) were of Middle Eastern descent and the rest Caucasians from Northern Europe. The first 21 patients were sutured with non-resorbable suture material polypropylene (PP) (Prolene® 5/0; Ethicon Inc.) and the subsequent 20 patients with a rapidly resorbable suture material, the 5/0 irradiated Polygalactic acid (PGA); (Vicryl Rapide® 5/0; Ethicon Inc.). Discomfort from the suture extraction of the PP sutures was compared to trimming of the PGA sutures at the skin surface 1 week postoperatively, and visibility of the columellar scars was evaluated by the patients themselves on a self-report questionnaire. This was done prior to the investigation and postoperative photography at the follow-up visit a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. The postoperative photographs were then assessed by 20 rhinoplasty surgeons independently, using the same questionnaire.

Results

Trimming of the PGA sutures caused significantly less discomfort than the extraction of PP sutures (p ≤ 0.01), of which 6 (29 %) found the suture extraction very painful. Overall, 40/41 (98 %) found their scars non-disturbing. Moreover, 17/21 (81 %) of the patients sutured with PP and 18/20 (90 %) of the patients sutured with PGA considered their scars to be invisible or almost invisible. The corresponding assessments from the observers were 16/21 (76 %) and 16/20 (80 %), respectively. No postoperative infection was found in any group.

Conclusion

Suturing inverted-V transcolumellar incisions with rapid resorbable sutures caused significantly less discomfort but no difference in scarring compared to non-resorbable sutures as evaluated by patients and observers.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J (2011) Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Aug 128(2):49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rethi A (1934) Operation to shorten an excessively long nose. Rev Chir Plast 2:85

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sercer A (1958) Dekortication der Nase. Chir Maxillofac Plast (Zagreb) 1:49

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman WS (1978) Technique of external rhinoplasty. J Otoloaryngol 7:13–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aksu I, Alim H, Tellioğlu AT (2008 Jul) Comparative columellar scar analysis between transverse and inverted-V incision in open rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(4):638–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Foda HM (2004) External rhinoplasty for the Arabian nose: a columellar scar analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28(5):312–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karounis H, Gouin S, Eisman H, Chalut D, Pelletier H, Williams B (2004) A randomized controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain catgut versus nonabsobable nylon suture. Acad Emerg Med 11(7):730–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parell GJ, Becker GD (2003) Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5(6):488–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Niechajev I, Haraldsson P-O (1997) Ethnic profile in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty in Stockholm. Aesth Plast Surg 21:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bafaqeeh SA, Al-Qattan MM (1998) Columellar scar analysis in an Arabian population. Plast Reconst Surg 102:1226–1228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Professor Tom Wang, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA for introducing us to the resorbable columella sutures.

Funding

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Alinasab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alinasab, B., Haraldsson, PO. Rapid Resorbable Sutures Are a Favourable Alternative to Non-resorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 40, 449–452 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0649-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0649-2

Keywords

Navigation