Abstract
Background
The open approach using inverted-V incisions has gained popularity in both primary and revision rhinoplasty during the last years. The risk of a disturbing columellar scar has been shown to be very low when meticulously closed. However, the suture extractions are usually painful and time consuming.
Objectives
To investigate if rapid resorbable sutures could replace non-resorbable sutures in nasal transcolumellar incisions. The present study compared (1) patient discomfort, (2) scarring and (3) risk for postoperative infection.
Materials and Methods
A total of 58 consecutive patients subjected to open rhinoplasty by the same surgeon using midcolumellar inverted-V incisions were investigated retrospectively. Forty-one (71 %) were eligible and investigated, of whom 27 (65 %) were of Middle Eastern descent and the rest Caucasians from Northern Europe. The first 21 patients were sutured with non-resorbable suture material polypropylene (PP) (Prolene® 5/0; Ethicon Inc.) and the subsequent 20 patients with a rapidly resorbable suture material, the 5/0 irradiated Polygalactic acid (PGA); (Vicryl Rapide® 5/0; Ethicon Inc.). Discomfort from the suture extraction of the PP sutures was compared to trimming of the PGA sutures at the skin surface 1 week postoperatively, and visibility of the columellar scars was evaluated by the patients themselves on a self-report questionnaire. This was done prior to the investigation and postoperative photography at the follow-up visit a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. The postoperative photographs were then assessed by 20 rhinoplasty surgeons independently, using the same questionnaire.
Results
Trimming of the PGA sutures caused significantly less discomfort than the extraction of PP sutures (p ≤ 0.01), of which 6 (29 %) found the suture extraction very painful. Overall, 40/41 (98 %) found their scars non-disturbing. Moreover, 17/21 (81 %) of the patients sutured with PP and 18/20 (90 %) of the patients sutured with PGA considered their scars to be invisible or almost invisible. The corresponding assessments from the observers were 16/21 (76 %) and 16/20 (80 %), respectively. No postoperative infection was found in any group.
Conclusion
Suturing inverted-V transcolumellar incisions with rapid resorbable sutures caused significantly less discomfort but no difference in scarring compared to non-resorbable sutures as evaluated by patients and observers.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J (2011) Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Aug 128(2):49–73
Rethi A (1934) Operation to shorten an excessively long nose. Rev Chir Plast 2:85
Sercer A (1958) Dekortication der Nase. Chir Maxillofac Plast (Zagreb) 1:49
Goodman WS (1978) Technique of external rhinoplasty. J Otoloaryngol 7:13–17
Aksu I, Alim H, Tellioğlu AT (2008 Jul) Comparative columellar scar analysis between transverse and inverted-V incision in open rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(4):638–640
Foda HM (2004) External rhinoplasty for the Arabian nose: a columellar scar analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28(5):312–316
Karounis H, Gouin S, Eisman H, Chalut D, Pelletier H, Williams B (2004) A randomized controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain catgut versus nonabsobable nylon suture. Acad Emerg Med 11(7):730–735
Parell GJ, Becker GD (2003) Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5(6):488–490
Niechajev I, Haraldsson P-O (1997) Ethnic profile in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty in Stockholm. Aesth Plast Surg 21:139–145
Bafaqeeh SA, Al-Qattan MM (1998) Columellar scar analysis in an Arabian population. Plast Reconst Surg 102:1226–1228
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Professor Tom Wang, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA for introducing us to the resorbable columella sutures.
Funding
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alinasab, B., Haraldsson, PO. Rapid Resorbable Sutures Are a Favourable Alternative to Non-resorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 40, 449–452 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0649-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0649-2