Abstract
Animal color patches may be static or plastic in expression and concealable or continuously visible, yet the evolution and function of these aspects of coloration have seldom been studied together. We investigated such color pattern elements using the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Despite a rich history of study of stickleback nuptial color pattern evolution, disagreement persists regarding selection pressures and function and only limited research has addressed the role of pelvic spine coloration, a potentially important, and substantially concealable, color pattern element. We investigated (i) whether male pelvic spine (along with throat and body) coloration is relatively static or plastic across the reproductive cycle, (ii) when pelvic spines are raised versus concealed across behavioral contexts, and (iii) associations between color patches and behavior in males. We found no significant variation in spine color across reproductive stages whereas body color was more plastic and intensely red during courtship and egg/fry care. Conspicuousness of pelvic spine coloration instead varied behaviorally, through increased erection frequency during social interactions and in response to a model predator. Spine erection frequency was positively associated with behaviors that enhance spine color visibility, i.e., flees and leads to nest. These findings suggest that stickleback use pelvic spines to display an intensely red color patch facultatively, either as a complement to similar body coloration or possibly as a substitute.
Significance statement
The interplay between color patches that are either readily concealable or always visible has been little studied, particularly in organisms with patches on a single individual that differ in capacity for concealment, such as the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). While much work has been done on the evolution of coloration in stickleback, little has addressed patterns of expression and evolutionary functions of pelvic spine color, which can be facultatively concealed. We evaluated the expression characteristics of male spine coloration within the spawning period and how spine color relates to other color patches. Our work also examines the relationship between pelvic spine erections and presentation of spine color patches and raises the possibility of pelvic spine color being naturally selected and functioning across different behavioral contexts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets that were compiled and analyzed in this study can be accessed at the following: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9kd51c5jm
References
Amundsen CR, Nordeide JT, Gjøen HM, Larsen B, Egeland ES (2015) Conspicuous carotenoid-based pelvic spine ornament in three-spined stickleback populations—occurrence and inheritance. PeerJ 3:e872
Bakker TCM (1994) Evolution of aggressive behaviour in the threespine stickleback. In: Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 345–380
Bakker TCM, Milinski M (1993) The advantages of being red: sexual selection in the stickleback. Mar Behav Physiol 23:287–300
Bakker TCM, Mundwiler B (1994) Female mate choice and male red coloration in a natural three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) population. Behav Ecol 5:74–80
Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) (1994) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bigelow HB, Schroeder WC (1953) Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. US Government Printing Office, Washington
Brock CD, Cummings ME, Bolnick DI (2017) Phenotypic plasticity drives a depth gradient in male conspicuousness in threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Evolution 71:2022–2036
Candolin U (1999) The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav 58:1261–1267
Candolin U, Tukiainen I (2015) The sexual selection paradigm: have we overlooked other mechanisms in the evolution of male ornaments? Proc R Soc B 282:20151987
Clarke JM, Schluter D (2011) Colour plasticity and background matching in a threespine stickleback species pair. Biol J Linn Soc 102:902–914
Cuthill IC (2007) Animal behaviour: Strategic signalling by cephalopods. Curr Biol 17:R1059–R1060
Cuthill IC, Allen WL, Arbuckle K, Caspers B, Chaplin G, Hauber ME, Hill GE, Jablonski NG, Jiggins CD, Kelber A (2017) The biology of color. Science 357:eaan0221
Duarte RC, Flores AA, Stevens M (2017) Camouflage through colour change: mechanisms, adaptive value and ecological significance. Phil Trans R Soc B 372:20160342
Endler JA (1984) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. In: Zaret TM (ed) Evolutionary ecology of neotropical freshwater fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 95–111
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125–S153
Foster SA, Shaw KA, Robert KL, Baker JA (2008) Benthic, limnetic and oceanic threespine stickleback: profiles of reproductive behaviour. Behaviour 145:485–508
Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330
Harvey PH, Paxton RJ (1981) The evolution of aposematic coloration. Oikos 37:391–393
Herczeg G, Turtiainen M, Merilä J (2010) Morphological divergence of North-European nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius): signatures of parallel evolution. Biol J Linn Soc 101:403–416
Hodgson A, Black AR, Hull R (2013) Sensory exploitation and indicator models may explain red pelvic spines in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans. Evol Ecol Res 15:199–211
Hoogland R (1951) On the fixing-mechanism in the spines of Gasterosteus aculeatus L. P K Ned Akad C Biol 54:171–180
Hoogland R, Morris D, Tinbergen N (1956) The spines of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus and Pygosteus) as means of defence against predators (Perca and Esox). Behaviour 10:205–236
Houde AE (1987) Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41:1–10
Huntingford FA (1976) The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 24:245–260
Johnson S, Candolin U (2017) Predation cost of a sexual signal in the threespine stickleback. Behav Ecol 28:1160–1165
Kim S-Y, Velando A (2014) Stickleback males increase red coloration and courtship behaviours in the presence of a competitive rival. Ethology 120:502–510
Kozak GM, Boughman JW (2012) Plastic responses to parents and predators lead to divergent shoaling behaviour in sticklebacks. J Evol Biol 25:759–769
Kozak GM, Boughman JW (2015) Predator experience overrides learned aversion to heterospecifics in stickleback species pairs. Proc R Soc B 282:20143066
Kroken KK, Sæthre AA, Nicolaisen O, Egeland TB, Nordeide JT (2021) Carotenoids-based reddish pelvic spines in nonreproducing female and male sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)–Signalling social dominance? Ecol Evol 11:11038–11050
Jenck CS, Lehto WR, Ketterman BT, Sloan LF, Sexton AN, Tinghitella RM (2020) Phenotypic divergence among threespine stickleback that differ in nuptial coloration. Ecol Evol 10:2900–2916
Loeffler-Henry K, Kang C, Yip Y, Caro T, Sherratt TN (2018) Flash behavior increases prey survival. Behav Ecol 29:528–533
Maia R, Gruson H, Endler JA, White TE (2019) pavo 2: new tools for the spectral and spatial analysis of colour in R. Methods Ecol Evol 10:1097–1107
Mazzi D, Künzler R, Bakker TCM (2003) Female preference for symmetry in computer-animated three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:156–161
Mazzi D, Künzler R, Largiadèr CR, Bakker TCM (2004) Inbreeding affects female preference for symmetry in computer-animated sticklebacks. Behav Genet 34:417–424
McInerney JE (1969) Reproductive behaviour of the blackspotted stickleback, Gasterosteus wheatlandi. J Fish Res Board Can 26:2061–2077
McKenzie JA (1969) The courtship behavior of the male brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans (Kirtland). Can J Zool 47:1281–1286
McKinnon JS (1995) Video mate preferences of female three-spined sticklebacks from populations with divergent male coloration. Anim Behav 50:1645–1655
McKinnon JS (1996) Red coloration and male parental behaviour in the threespine stickleback. J Fish Biol 49:1030–1033
McKinnon JS, Rundle HD (2002) Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol Evol 17:480–488
McKinnon JS, Demayo RF, Granquist R, Weggel L (2000) Female red throat coloration in two populations of threespine stickleback. Behaviour 137:947–963
McLennan DA (1996) Integrating phylogenetic and experimental analyses: the evolution of male and female nuptial coloration in the stickleback fishes (Gasterosteidae). Syst Biol 45:261–277
McLennan DA, McPhail JD (1989) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial colouration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): temporal changes in the structure of the male mosaic signal. Can J Zool 67:1767–1777
McLennan DA, McPhail JD (1990) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial colouration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): the relationship between male colour and female behaviour. Can J Zool 68:482–492
McLennan DA, Ward JL (2006) Changes in agonistic, courtship and parental displays of the male brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans, across the breeding cycle. Behaviour 143:33–56
Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330–333
Moodie G (1972) Predation, natural selection and adaptation in an unusual threespine stickleback. Heredity 28:155–167
Morris D (1958) The reproductive behaviour of the ten-spined stickleback (Pygosteus pungitius L.). Behaviour Suppl 6:1–154
Nordeide JT (2002) Do male sticklebacks prefer females with red ornamentation? Can J Zool 80:1344–1349
Nordeide JT, Rudolfsen G, Egeland ES (2006) Ornaments or offspring? Female sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) trade off carotenoids between spines and eggs. J Evol Biol 19:431–439
Ostlund-Nilsson S, Mayer I, Huntingford FA (2006) Biology of the three-spined stickleback: CRC press, Boca Raton
Perneger TV (1998) What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Brit Med J 316:1236–1238
Reimchen T (1983) Structural relationships between spines and lateral plates in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Evolution 37:931–946
Reimchen TE (1994) Predators and morphological evolution in threespine stickleback. In: Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback: Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 240-276
Reisman HM (1963) Reproductive behavior of Apeltes quadracus, including some comparisons with other gasterosteid fishes. Copeia 1963:191–192
Rothman KJ (1990) No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1:43–46
Rowland WJ (1974) Reproductive behavior of the fourspine stickleback, Apeltes quadracus. Copeia 1974:183–194
Rowland WJ (1982) The effects of male nuptial coloration on stickleback aggression: a reexamination. Behaviour 80:118–126
Rowland WJ (1984) The relationships among nuptial coloration, aggression, and courtship of male three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Can J Zool 62:999–1004
Rush V, Abney M, McKinnon JS, Sargent RC (2003) Reflectance spectra from free-swimming sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): social context and eye-jaw contrast. Behaviour 140:1003–1019
Scott RJ, Foster SA (2000) Field data do not support a textbook example of convergent character displacement. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:607–612
Smith JM, Harper D, 2003. Animal signals: Oxford University Press, Oxford
Stuckert AMM, Drury S, Anderson CM, Bowling TBT, Mckinnon JS (2019) Evolution and assessment of colour patterns in stream-resident and anadromous male threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus from three regions. J Fish Biol 94:520–525
Symons PE (1966) Analysis of spine-raising in the male three-spined stickleback. Behaviour 26:1–75
Tibblin P, Hall M, Svensson PA, Merilä J, Forsman A (2020) Phenotypic flexibility in background-mediated color change in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol 31:950–959
Umbers KD, De Bona S, White TE, Lehtonen J, Mappes J, Endler JA (2017) Deimatism: a neglected component of antipredator defence. Biol Lett 13:20160936
Umbers KD, Lehtonen J, Mappes J (2015) Deimatic displays. Curr Biol 25:R58–R59
van Iersel JJA (1953) An analysis of the parental behaviour of the male three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour Suppl 3:1–159
Ward JL, McLennan DA (2006) Changes in agonistic, courtship and parental displays of the male brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans, across the breeding cycle. Behaviour 143:33–56
Wootton R (1971) Measures of the aggression of parental male three-spined sticklebacks. Behaviour 40:228–261
Wright DS, Pierotti ME, Rundle HD, McKinnon JS (2015) Conspicuous female ornamentation and tests of male mate preference in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). PLoS ONE 10:e0120723
Wright DS, Yong L, Pierotti ME, McKinnon JS (2016) Male red throat coloration, pelvic spine coloration, and courtship behaviours in threespine stickleback. Evol Ecol Res 17:407–418
Yong L, Guo R, Wright DS, Mears SA, Pierotti M, McKinnon JS (2013) Correlates of red throat coloration in female stickleback and their potential evolutionary significance. Evol Ecol Res 15:453–472
Yong L, Peichel CL, McKinnon JS (2016) Genetic architecture of conspicuous red ornaments in female threespine stickleback. Genes Genomes Genet 6:579–588
Acknowledgements
We thank the Semiahmoo First Nation for granting us permission to collect fish on their land and the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations for allowing fish collections within British Columbia (Permit No: MRNA17-262956 and MRSU18-290075). We thank Catherine Peichel and the Peichel Lab for guidance and use of supplies for stickleback capture. Many thanks to the East Carolina University Department of Biology and members of the McKinnon lab for help in fish care, Cole Pena and Feixiang He for assistance in color analysis, and Drew Varnell for help in edits. We are grateful to Xiangming Fang for consulting on statistical approaches and for the assistance with statistical analyses, as well as Jeffrey Cole, Lucas Tidmarsh-Cortes, Adam Stuckert, and Michael Anderson for aid with mathematical analyses and coding. Finally, thanks to Kyle Summers, Christopher Balakrishnan, and two anonymous referees for constructive feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R15GM109291. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CMA and JSM conceived the experiment. CMA carried out the experimental trials and data collection, CMA and JSM performed data analysis, and CMA drafted the manuscript. Both authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study complied with and followed rules governed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at East Carolina University (Animal Use Protocol #D349). This work was possible because of approval by the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations for fish collection (Permit Numbers MRNA17-262956 and MRSU18-290075).
Consent for publication
The authors of this work consent to publication of this manuscript in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by J. G. Frommen.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, C.M., McKinnon, J.S. Phenotypic correlates of pelvic spine coloration in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): implications for function and evolution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 76, 153 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03256-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03256-9