Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

When do looks matter? Effects of mate quality and environmental variability on lifetime reproduction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inter-individual variation in lifetime reproduction is the key target for natural selection, and it is influenced by many factors. Yet, we lack an understanding of how abiotic and biotic factors interact to influence lifetime reproductive output (number of offspring) and reproductive effort (total biomass invested into reproduction). Thus, we used a factorial design to manipulate variability in food availability and temperature while also accounting for mate quality. We tested hypotheses related to estimates of lifetime reproductive output and effort in females of the wing-dimorphic sand field cricket (Gryllus firmus). Environmental variability influenced a temporal tradeoff of reproduction because females experiencing fluctuating temperatures had a particular bias toward reproductive output during early adulthood. Also, complex environmental variability (i.e., multiple and co-varying environmental factors) influenced differential allocation, which is when individuals adjust their reproductive efforts according to mate quality. Females mated to higher quality males laid more eggs only in environments that were highly stable (constant temperature and ad libitum food access). Reproductive effort was affected by a food–temperature interaction—fluctuating temperatures promoted egg production when food was limited, while constant temperature promoted egg production when food was abundant. Although a wing dimorphism mediates a well-established flight–fecundity tradeoff during early adulthood in G. firmus, short- and long-winged morphs exhibited similar lifetime reproduction and responded similarly to complex environmental variability. Given the natural co-variation of many environmental factors (e.g., water limitation often accompanies heat waves), we encourage continued work examining the role of complex environmental variability in tradeoffs related to reproductive decision-making and allocation.

Significance statement

It is unclear how abiotic and biotic factors interact to influence lifetime reproductive output (number of offspring) and reproductive effort (total biomass invested into reproduction). Thus, we examined the effects of mate quality and complex environmental variability (variable food and temperature) on several metrics of lifetime reproduction. Female crickets mated to high-quality males had greater reproductive output, but only in highly stable or environmental conditions. Fluctuating temperatures biased reproductive output toward early adulthood, particularly in short-winged females. Reproductive effort was affected by a food–temperature interaction—fluctuating temperatures promoted egg production when food was limited, while constant temperature promoted egg production when food was abundant. Females can also retain unfertilized eggs, and egg retention (i.e., unrealized fitness potential) was influenced by a combination of mate quality and complex environments. Thus, it is important to carefully consider the interplay between biotic and abiotic factors in aspects of lifetime reproduction and reproductive decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adamo SA, Hoy RR (1995) Agonistic behavior in male and female field crickets, GRYLLUS-BIMACULATUS, and how behavioral context influences its expression. Anim Behav 49:1491–1501

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamo SA, Baker JL, Lovett MME, Wilson G (2012) Climate change and temperate zone insects: the tyranny of thermodynamics meets the world of limited resources. Environ Entomol 41:1644–1652

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17:130–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JL, Albergotti L, Ellebracht B, Huey RB, Phillips PC (2011) Does thermoregulatory behavior maximize reproductive fitness of natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans? BMC Evol Biol 11:157

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Angilletta MJ (2009) Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical synthesis. University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL, Ross CL (1993) The effect of adult food limitation on life history traits in Speyeria mormonia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Ecology 74:433–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Both C, Visser ME (2005) The effect of climate change on the correlation between avian life-history traits. Glob Chang Biol 11:1606–1613

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretman A, Rodriguez-Munoz R, Tregenza T (2006) Male dominance determines female egg laying rate in crickets. Biol Lett 2:409–411

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman WY (1975) Competition, the fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size. Am Nat 109:677–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Brommer JE (2000) The evolution of fitness in life-history theory. Biol Rev 75:377–404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Capinera JL, Scott RD, Walker TJ (2004) Field guide to grasshoppers, crickets, and katydids of the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriere Y, Roff DA (1995) The evolution of offspring size and number - a test of the Smith-Fretwell model in three species of crickets. Oecologia 102:389–396

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charmantier A, McCleery RH, Cole LR, Perrins C, Kruuk LEB, Sheldon BC (2008) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320:800–803

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1984) Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals. Am Nat 123:212–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1966) A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20:174–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connallon T, Hall MD (2016) Genetic correlations and sex-specific adaptation in changing environments. Evolution 70:2186–2198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1995) Fitness differences associated with calling behaviour in the two wing morphs of male sand crickets, Gryllus firmus. Anim Behav 50:1475–1481

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin AD, Ryan MJ, Page RA et al (2019) Environmental heterogeneity alters mate choice behavior for multimodal signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:43

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling ES, Cote IM (2008) Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies. Ecol Lett 11:1278–1286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon ME, Woods HA, Wang G, Fey SB, Vasseur DA, Telemeco RS, Marshall K, Pincebourde S (2016) Life in the frequency domain: the biological impacts of changes in climate variability at multiple time scales. Integr Comp Biol 56:14–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douhard M, Loe LE, Stien A, Bonenfant C, Irvine RJ, Veiberg V, Ropstad E, Albon S (2016) The influence of weather conditions during gestation on life histories in a wild Arctic ungulate. Proc R Soc Lond B 283:20161760

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield KR, Bowers EK, Sakaluk SK, Sadd BM (2017) A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:185

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eraly D, Hendrickx F, Lens L (2009) Condition-dependent mate choice and its implications for population differentiation in the wolf spider Pirata piraticus. Behav Ecol 20:856–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans JP, Garcia-Gonzalez F (2016) The total opportunity for sexual selection and the integration of pre- and post-mating episodes of sexual selection in a complex world. J Evol Biol 29:2338–2361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher HS, Rosenthal GG (2006) Hungry females show stronger mating preferences. Behav Ecol 17:979–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Flatt T, Heyland A (2011) Mechanisms of life history evolution the genetics and physiology of life history traits and trade-offs. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Moya-Larano J (2009) Diet affects female mating behaviour in a seed-feeding beetle. Physiol Entomol 34:370–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershman SN (2010) Large numbers of matings give female field crickets a direct benefit but not a genetic benefit. J Insect Behav 23:59–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass JR, Stahlschmidt ZR (2019) Should I stay or should I go? Complex environments influence the developmental plasticity of flight capacity and flight-related trade-offs. Biol J Linn Soc blz073. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz073

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotthard K, Berger D, Walters R (2007) What keeps insects small? Time limitation during oviposition reduces the fecundity benefit of female size in a butterfly. Am Nat 169:768–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (2008) Reproductive compensation. J Evol Biol 21:1189–1200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra P (2011) Evaluating the life-history trade-off between dispersal capability and reproduction in wing dimorphic insects: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev 86:813–835

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haaland TR, Wright J, Kuijper B, Ratikainen II (2017) Differential allocation revisited: when should mate quality affect parental investment? Am Nat 190:534–546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris WE, Uller T (2009) Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1039–1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshman LG, Zera AJ (2007) The cost of reproduction: the devil in the details. Trends Ecol Evol 22:80–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A, Caswell H (1979) Role of environmental variability in the evolution of life history strategies. Proc NatI Acad Sci U S A 76:4700–4703

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hervé C, Brent JS, Philippe V, David R (2015) Insects in Fluctuating Thermal Environments. Annual Review of Entomology 60:1, 123–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honek A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects – a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvathova T, Nakagawa S, Uller T (2012) Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaunisto S, Ferguson LV, Sinclair BJ (2016) Can we predict the effects of multiple stressors on insects in a changing climate? Curr Opin Insect Sci 17:55–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King EG, Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (2011) Trade-off acquisition and allocation in Gryllus firmus: a test of the Y model. J Evol Biol 24:256–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk KL (1997) Life-history responses to variable environments: starvation and reproduction in planktonic rotifers. Ecology 78:434–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjesbu OS, Witthames PR, Solemdal P, Walker MG (1998) Temporal variations in the fecundity of Arcto-Norwegian cod (Gadus morhua) in response to natural changes in food and temperature. J Sea Res 40:303–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinteich A, Wilder SM, Schneider JM (2015) Contributions of juvenile and adult diet to the lifetime reproductive success and lifespan of a spider. Oikos 124:130138

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpimaki E, Wiehn J (1998) Clutch size of kestrels: seasonal decline and experimental evidence for food limitation under fluctuating food conditions. Oikos 83:259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre JF, Berger V, Bonenfant C, Douhard M, Gamelon M, Plard F, Gaillard JM (2015) Early-late life trade-offs and the evolution of ageing in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond B 282:20150209

    Google Scholar 

  • Lierheimer VF, Tinghitella RM (2017) Quantity and quality of available mates alters female responsiveness but not investment in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:80

    Google Scholar 

  • Long TAF, Agrawal AF, Rowe L (2012) The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr Biol 22:204–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorch PD, Proulx S, Rowe L, Day T (2003) Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol Ecol Res 5:867–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C (1991) Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 6:183–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McBryan TL, Anttila K, Healy TM, Schulte PM (2013) Responses to temperature and hypoxia as interacting stressors in fish: implications for adaptation to environmental change. Integr Comp Biol 53:648–659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mole S, Zera AJ (1994) Differential resource consumption obviates a potential flight fecundity trade-off in the sand cricket (GRYLLUS-FIRMUS). Funct Ecol 8:573–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskalik B, Uetz GW (2011) Female hunger state affects mate choice of a sexually selected trait in a wolf spider. Anim Behav 81:715–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen K, Stahlschmidt ZR (2019) When to fight? Disentangling temperature and circadian effects on aggression and agonistic contests. Anim Behav 148:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack SH, Tuljapurkar S (2001) Reproductive effort in variable environments, or environmental variation IS for the birds. Ecology 82:2659–2665

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantala MJ, Kortet R (2004) Male dominance and immunocompetence in a field cricket. Behav Ecol 15:187–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratikainen II, Kokko H (2010) Differential allocation and compensation: who deserves the silver spoon? Behav Ecol 21:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1994) Habitat persistence and the evolution of wing dimorphism in insects. Am Nat 144:772–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer Press, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA, Gelinas MB (2003) Phenotypic plasticity and the evolution of trade-offs: the quantitative genetics of resource allocation in the wing dimorphic cricket, Gryllus firmus. J Evol Biol 16:55–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kolliker M (2012) The evolution of parental care. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh NW, Larson EL, Harrison RG (2014) Reproductive success and body size in the cricket Gryllus firmus. J Insect Behav 27:346–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears MW, Angilletta MJ, Schuler MS, Borchert J, Dilliplane KF, Stegman M, Rusch TW, Mitchell WA (2016) Configuration of the thermal landscape determines thermoregulatory performance of ectotherms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:10595–10600

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R (1988) The evolution of large body size in females: a critique of Darwin's ‘fecundity advantage’ model. Am Nat 131:124–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker KL, Adamo SA (2007) Adult female crickets, Gryllus texensis, maintain reproductive output after repeated immune challenges. Physiol Entomol 32:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1986) Inter-male competition and mating success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav 34:567–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatyer RA, Mautz BS, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD (2012) Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev 87:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) Optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, Adamo SA (2013) Warm and cozy: temperature and predation risk interactively affect oviposition-site selection. Anim Behav 86:553–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, Adamo SA (2015) Food-limited mothers favour offspring quality over offspring number: a principal components approach. Funct Ecol 29:88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, DeNardo DF (2010) Parental behavior in pythons is responsive to both the hydric and thermal dynamics of the nest. J Exp Biol 213:1691–1696

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, Brashears J, DeNardo DF (2011) The role of temperature and humidity in python nest site selection. Anim Behav 81:1077–1081

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, Rollinson N, Acker M, Adamo SA (2013) Are all eggs created equal? Food availability and the fitness trade-off between reproduction and immunity. Funct Ecol 27:800–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, O'Leary ME, Adamo SA (2014) Food limitation leads to risky decision-making and to tradeoffs with oviposition. Behav Ecol 25:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlschmidt ZR, Acker M, Kovalko I, Adamo SA (2015) The double-edged sword of immune defence and damage control: Do food availability and immune challenge alter the balance? Functional Ecology. 29, 1445–1452

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE (1993) A temperate region view of the interaction of temperature, food quality, and predators on caterpillar foraging. In: Stamp NE, Casey TM (eds) Caterpillars: ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) Evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strambi A, Strambi C, Cayre M (1997) Hormonal control of reproduction and reproductive behavior in crickets. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 35:393–404

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todgham AE, Stillman JH (2013) Physiological responses to shifts in multiple environmental stressors: relevance in a changing world. Integr Comp Biol 53:539–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedenina VY, Shestakov LS (2018) Loser in fight but winner in love: how does inter-male competition determine the pattern and outcome of courtship in cricket Gryllus bimaculatus? Front Ecol Evol 6:197

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D (1996) The role of nourishment in oogenesis. Annu Rev Entomol 41:407–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC, Agrawal AF (2009) Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63:569–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton RJ (1979) Energy cost of egg reproduction and environmental determinants of fecundity in teleost fishes. Symp Zool Soc Lond 44:133–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington AM, Kelly CD (2016) Direct costs and benefits of multiple mating: are high female mating rates due to ejaculate replenishment? Behav Process 124:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn H, Vahed K (2004) Male Gryllus bimaculatus guard females to delay them from mating with rival males and to obtain repeated copulations. J Insect Behav 17:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammuto RM, Millar JS (1985) Environmental predictability, variability, and Spermophilus columbianus life history over an elevational gradient. Ecology 66:1784–1794

    Google Scholar 

  • Zera AJ (2005) Intermediary metabolism and life history trade-offs: lipid metabolism in lines of the wing-polymorphic cricket, Gryllus firmus, selected for flight capability vs. early age reproduction. Integr Comp Biol 45:511–524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zera AJ, Cisper G (2001) Genetic and diurnal variation in the juvenile hormone titer in a wing-polymorphic cricket: implications for the evolution of life histories and dispersal. Physiol Biochem Zool 74:293–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zera AJ, Denno RF (1997) Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:207–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zera AJ, Harshman LG (2001) The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:95–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Zera AJ, Sall J, Grudzinski K (1997) Flight-muscle polymorphism in the cricket Gryllus firmus: muscle characteristics and their influence on the evolution of flightlessness. Physiol Zool 70:519–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zera AJ, Zhao Z, Kaliseck K (2007) Hormones in the field: evolutionary endocrinology of juvenile hormone and ecdysteroids in field populations of the wing-dimorphic cricket Gryllus firmus. Physiol Biochem Zool 80:592–606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Andy Byeon, Grace Cho, Jordan Glass, Stephanie Ha, Narin Jeong, David Luc, Garrett Masuda, Katherine Nguyen, and Carolyn Pak for animal care and/or experimental assistance. We also appreciate feedback on the manuscript from Jordan Glass, Dustin Johnson, and an anonymous reviewer.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Science Foundation (IOS-1565695 to ZRS) and University of the Pacific (to ZRS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, 95211, USA

    Z. R. Stahlschmidt, I. Chu & C. Koh

Authors
  1. Z. R. Stahlschmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. R. Stahlschmidt.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Shaw

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stahlschmidt, Z.R., Chu, I. & Koh, C. When do looks matter? Effects of mate quality and environmental variability on lifetime reproduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2790-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2790-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation