Abstract
Sexual selection has an undeniable influence in the evolution of the spectacular diversity of courtship signals in the animal kingdom. A long history of study has pointed to mechanisms through which sexual selection can act: it can favor signals that are reliable indicators of species identity or effectively transfer mate quality information. In some species, these mechanisms have the potential to shape signal evolution. This is the case in fiddler crabs. Males court females by waving their sexually dimorphic claw. Females recognize conspecific males by the species-specific display, while intraspecific variants of the display appear to be indicators of male quality. We investigated which of these mechanisms prevail by using robotics to test female responses to waves of different heights in the fiddler crab, Austruca mjoebergi. We reveal that, although the studied species shares a sympatric habitat, females did not significantly more often approach the species’ average signal. We found evidence that more conspicuous, higher signals were more likely to attract females, although the effect was not particularly strong. We discuss our results in the light of other possible scenarios from which sexual selection can act in the evolution of signals.
Significance statement
Sexual selection has strong role in the evolution of courtship signals. A large body of evidence has revealed that mating preferences may favor signals that indicate species identity or mate quality. We study which of these mechanisms is predominant in fiddler crabs. We use robotics to investigate female preference for a highly conspicuous and diverse characteristic of courtship signals. We found that females most likely do not use the signal for species recognition, but instead favor signals that stand out and indicate mate quality. Our results advocate that directional selection is likely to be predominant, but we suggest that a more complex mosaic of selective forces may influence the evolution of the high interspecific signal diversity in fiddler crabs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Araujo SBL, Rorato AC, Perez DM, Pie MR (2013) A spatially explicit model of synchronization in fiddler crab waving displays. PloS One 8(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057362
Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH, Passmore JH (1999) Female choice in the synchronously waving fiddler crab Uca annulipes. Ethology 105:415–421
Bian X, Chandler T, Laird W, Pinilla A, Peters R (2018) Integrating evolutionary biology with digital arts to quantify ecological constraints on vision-based behaviour. Methods Ecol Evol 9:544–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12912
Booksmythe I, Detto T, Backwell PRY (2008) A field guide to the fiddler crabs of east point reserve, Darwin, Northern Territory. North Territ Nat 20:26–33
Boul KE, Funk WC, Darst CR, Cannatella DC, Ryan MJ (2007) Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 274:399–406. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3736
Bourdiol J, Chou C-C, Perez DP, Backwell PRY (2018) Investigating the role of mud structures in a fiddler crab: do semidomes have a reproductive function? In press
Burford FRL, McGregor PK, Oliveira RF (2000) Response of fiddler crabs (Uca tangeri) to video playback in the field. Acta Ethol 3:55–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102110000020
Bywater CL, Wilson RS, Monro K, White CR (2018) Legs of male fiddler crabs evolved to compensate for claw exaggeration and enhance claw functionality during waving displays. Evolution 72:2491–2502. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13617
Callander S, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2012) The effect of claw size and wave rate on female choice in a fiddler crab. J Ethol 30:151–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0309-6
Chen I-P, Stuart-Fox D, Hugall AF, Symonds MRE (2012) Sexual selection and the evolution of complex color patterns in dragon lizards. Evolution 66:3605–3614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01698.x
Christy JH, Salmon M (1991) Comparative studies of reproductive behavior in mantis shrimps and fiddler crabs. Am Zool 31:329–337
Clark HL, Backwell PRY (2016) Assortative mating in a fiddler crab. Behaviour 153:175–185
Cornwallis CK, Uller T (2010) Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol Evol 25:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.09.008
deRivera CE (2005) Long searches for male- defended breeding burrows allow female fiddler crabs, Uca crenulata, to release larvae on time. Anim Behav 70:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.10.027
Detto T, Backwell PRY, Hemmi JM, Zeil J (2006) Visually mediated species and neighbour recognition in fiddler crabs (Uca mjoebergi and Uca capricornis). P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 273:1661–1666. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3503
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125–S153
Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0865-7
Hemmi JM, Marshall J, Pix W, Vorobyev M, Zeil J (2006) The variable colours of the fiddler crab Uca vomeris and their relation to background and predation. J Exp Biol 209:4140–4153. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02483
Hingle A, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2001) Size-dependent mate preference in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Anim Behav 61:589–595. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1613
Holman L, Kahn AT, Backwell PRY (2014) Fiddlers on the roof: elevation muddles mate choice in fiddler crabs. Behav Ecol 25:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art125
How MJ, Hemmi JM, Zeil J, Peters R (2008) Claw waving display changes with receiver distance in fiddler crabs, Uca perplexa. Anim Behav 75:1015–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.004
How MJ, Zeil J, Hemmi JM (2009) Variability of a dynamic visual signal: the fiddler crab claw-waving display. J Comp Physiol A 195:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0382-7
How MJ, Christy JH, Temple SE, Hemmi JM, Marshall NJ, Roberts NW (2015) Target detection is enhanced by polarization vision in a fiddler crab. Curr Biol 25:3069–3073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.073
Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos 72:283–327
Jordão JM, Curto AF, Oliveira RF (2007) Stereotypy and variation in the claw waving display of the fiddler crab Uca tangeri. Acta Ethol 10:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0030-1
Kirkpatrick M (1987) Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:43–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.000355
Klomp DA, Ord TJ, Das I, Diesmos A, Ahmad N (2016) Ornament size and colour as alternative strategies for effective communication in gliding lizards. J Evol Biol 29:1689–1700. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12908
Land M, Layne J (1995) The visual control of behaviour in fiddler crabs I. Resolution, thresholds and the role of the horizon. J Comp Physiol A 177:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243401
Magnhagen C (1991) Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 6:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90210-O
McLean CA, Moussalli A, Stuart-Fox D (2014) Local adaptation and divergence in colour signal conspicuousness between monomorphic and polymorphic lineages in a lizard. J Evol Biol 27:2654–2664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12521
Mowles SL, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2018) Robotic crabs reveal that female fiddler crabs are sensitive to changes in male display rate. Biol Lett 14:20170695
Murai M, Backwell PRY (2006) A conspicuous courtship signal in the fiddler crab Uca perplexa: female choice based on display structure. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:736–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0217-x
Murai M, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD (2009) The cost of reliable signaling: experimental evidence for predictable variation among males in a cost-benefit trade-off between sexually selected traits. Evolution 63:2363–2371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00726.x
Oliveira RF, Custodio MR (1998) Claw size, waving display and female choice in the European fiddler crab, Uca tangeri. Ethol Ecol Evol 10:241–251
Ord TJ, Martins EP (2006) Tracing the origins of signal diversity in anole lizards: phylogenetic approaches to inferring the evolution of complex behaviour. Anim Behav 71:1411–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.12.003
Perez DM, Rosenberg MS, Pie MR (2012) The evolution of waving displays in fiddler crabs (Uca spp., Crustacea: Ocypodidae). Biol J Linn Soc 106:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01860.x
Perez DM, Christy JH, Backwell PRY (2016) Choosing a mate in a high predation environment: female preference in the fiddler crab Uca terpsichores. Ecol Evol 6:7443–7450. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2510
Perez DM, Backwell PRY (2017) Female preferences for conspecific and heterospecific wave patterns in a fiddler crab. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 486:155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.09.018
Pfennig KS (1998) The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 265:1743–1748. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0497
Pope DS (2005) Waving in a crowd: fiddler crabs signal in networks. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 2522–2576
Ramos JA, Peters RA (2017) Habitat-dependent variation in motion signal structure between allopatric populations of lizards. Anim Behav 126:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.01.022
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org/
Reaney LT, Sims RA, Sims SWM, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2008) Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs. Curr Biol 18:62–63
Ronald KL, Fernández-Juricic E, Lucas JR (2012) Taking the sensory approach: how individual differences in sensory perception can influence mate choice. Anim Behav 84:1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.015
Ryan MJ, Rand SA (1993) Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Philos T R Soc B 340:187–195
Ryan MJ (1998) Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 28:1999–2003. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5385.1999
Sætre G-P, Moum T, Bureš S, Král M, Adamjan M, Moreno J (1997) A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589–592. https://doi.org/10.1038/42451
Salmon M, Hyatt G, McCarth K, Costlow JJD (1978) Display specificity and reproductive isolation in fiddler crabs, Uca panacea and U. pugilator. Z Tierpsychol 48:251–276
Tazzyman SJ, Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A (2014) Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection. Evolution 68:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12255
West-Eberhard MJ (1979) Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. P Am Philos Soc 123:222–234. https://doi.org/10.1086/413215
Widemo F, Sæther SA (1999) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol Evol 14:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01531-6
Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214
Zeil J, Nalbach G, Nalbach H (1986) Eyes, eye stalks and the visual world of semi-terrestrial crabs. J Comp Physiol 159:801–811
Zeil J, Al-Mutairi M (1996) The variation of resolution and of ommatidial dimensions in the compound eyes of the fiddler crab Uca lactea annulipes (Ocypodidae, Brachyura, Decapoda). J Exp Biol 199:1569–1577
Acknowledgments
We thank the North Australian Research Unit for facilities, Liam Bailey, for contributions in the analysis; Jessie Au, Nina McLean, Jia Huei Chen, Chun-Chia Chou, Erin McCullough, Julien Bourdiol, and Craig Clark for fieldwork assistance and useful comments on the project. We also thank our two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that contributed to improve the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP160100316) to P.R.Y.B.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This research was approved by the Australian National University Animal Ethics Committee (permit A2015/54).
Additional information
Communicated by T. Breithaupt
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perez, D.M., Backwell, P.R.Y. Selection for conspicuous visual signals in a fiddler crab. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73, 61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2670-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2670-3