Skip to main content
Log in

Northern flicker mates foraging on renewing patches within home ranges avoid competition not by separate niches but by segregation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foraging with others can reduce predation risk but may increase competition for resources. Species, sex, or age classes may use different niches to reduce competition for food, which may be enforced by social dominance or may lead to ecological specialization. An alternate hypothesis is that individuals using resource patches that renew over time intentionally avoid recently depleted patches by avoiding each other. We tested these hypotheses by simultaneously radio-tracking northern flicker (Colaptes auratus) mates. Members of a pair rarely foraged in the same patch, spending over 90 % of the time >50 m apart. Counter to the ecological specialization hypothesis, the types of ground cover used for foraging and the distance of foraging patches from cover and edge did not differ between males and females. Mates were more spatially segregated on the home range than random and males foraged closer to the nest than females, but we never saw agonistic behaviors counter to the dominance hypothesis. Both sexes avoided returning to the same foraging location repeatedly, perhaps because of prey depletion. We suggest that members of a pair avoided foraging close to each other to reduce encounters with depleted prey patches. We emphasize the importance of simultaneous tracking of mates to identify foraging strategies and potential niche segregation at the home range scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho T, Kuitunen M, Suhonen J, Hakkari T, Jäntti A (1997) Effects of male removal on female foraging behavior in the Eurasian treecreeper. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardia DR, Bildstein KL (1997) Sex-related differences in habitat selection in wintering American kestrels, Falco sparverius. Anim Behav 53:1305–1311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo B, Amar A, Leckie F, Buchanan GM, Wilson JD, Redpath S (2009) Hunting habitat selection by hen harriers on moorland: implications for conservation and management. Biol Conserv 142:586–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkman CW (1988) Flock size, food dispersion and the feeding behavior of crossbills. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conradt L (2005) Definitions, hypotheses, models and measures in the study of animal segregation. In: Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (eds) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Houston AI (1981) Owners and satellites: the economics of territory defence in the pied wagtail. J Anim Ecol 50:157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers A (1989) Sex, dominance and microhabitat use in wintering black-capped chickadees: a field experiment. Ecology 70:636–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elchuk CL, Wiebe KL (2002) Food and predation risk as factors related to foraging locations of northern flickers. Wilson Bull 114:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elchuk CL, Wiebe KL (2003a) Home-range size of northern flickers (Colaptes auratus) in relation to habitat and parental attributes. Can J Zool 81:954–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elchuk CL, Wiebe KL (2003b) Ephemeral food resources and high conspecific densities as factors explaining lack of feeding territories in northern flickers (Colaptes auratus). Auk 120:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33

  • Enoksson B (1988) Age- and sex- related differences in dominance and foraging behaviour of nuthatches Sitta europaea. Anim Behav 36:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans ML, Stutchbury BJM, Woolfenden BE (2008) Off-territory forays and genetic mating system of the wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). Auk 125:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P, Chaplin SB (1975) On the relationship between wing disc loading and foraging strategy in hummingbirds. Am Nat 109:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzreb KE (2010) Red-cockaded woodpecker male/female foraging differences in young forest stands. Wilson J Ornithol 122:244–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorrell JV, Ritchison G, Morton ES (2005) Territory size and stability in a sedentary neotropical passerine: is resource partitioning a necessary condition? J Field Ornithol 76:395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gow EA, Wiebe KL (2014) Survival and habitat selection by fledgling northern flickers in a fragmented forest. J Wildl Manag 78:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gow EA, Musgrove AB, Wiebe KL (2013a) Brood age and size influence sex-specific parental provisioning patterns in a sex-role reversed species. J Ornithol 154:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gow EA, Wiebe KL, Higgins RJ (2013b) Lack of diet segregation during breeding by male and female northern flickers foraging on ants. J Field Ornithol 84:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (2009) Sexual differences of labour during breeding activities and territory use in the lesser spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos minor. Ornis Norv 32:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (2010) Sexual differences in foraging behaviour in the lesser spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos minor. Ornis Norv 33:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes RT (1986) Foraging patterns of forest birds: male-female differences. Wilson Bull 98:196–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JM (1979) Foraging behavior of male and female Nuttall’s woodpeckers. Auk 96:418–420

    Google Scholar 

  • JMP®, Version 10 (2013) SAS Institute Inc Cary, N.C

  • Kamil AC, van Riper IIIC (1982) Within-territory division of foraging space by male and female amakihi (Loxops virens). Condor 84:117–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilham L (1965) Differences in feeding behavior of male and female hairy woodpeckers. Wilson Bull 77:134–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, MacRoberts BR, Cullen JM (1972) Flocking and feeding in the great tit Parus major—an experimental study. Ibis 114:507–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon JD (1968) Sexual differences in foraging behavior in two species of Dendrocopos woodpeckers. Auk 85:203–215

  • Marra PP, Sherry TW, Holmes RT (1993) Territorial exclusion by a long-distance migrant warbler in Jamaica: a removal experiment with American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla). Auk 110:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto DC, Wasserman FE (1991) Intersexual and interspecific differences in the foraging behavior of rufous-sided towhees, common yellowthroats and prairie warblers in the pine barrens of southeastern Massachusetts. J Field Ornithol 62:436–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1977) Feeding behavior and predator avoidance in heterospecific groups. Bioscience 27:332–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1990) Habitat selection by sex in the hooded warbler: experiments on proximate causation and discussion of its evolution. Am Nat 135:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksansen J, Blanchett FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR et al (2012) Vegan: community ecology package. R-package version 2.0–3.0. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html

  • Pasinelli G (2000) Sexual dimorphism and foraging niche partitioning in the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius. Ibis 142:635–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechacek P (2006) Foraging behavior of Eurasian three-toed woodpeckers (Picoides tridactylus alpinus) in relation to sex and season in Germany. Auk 123:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters DWM, Grubb JTC (1983) An experimental analysis of sex-specific foraging in the downy woodpecker Picoides pubescens. Ecology 64:1437–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Development Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.14.2 R Foundation for Statistic Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Radford AN, duPlessis MA (2003) Bill dimorphism and foraging niche partitioning in the green woodhoopoe. J Anim Ecol 72:258–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rands SA, Cowishaw G, Pettifor RA, Rowcliffe JM, Johnstone RA (2003) Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature 423:432–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JD (1971) Differential niche utilization in a grassland sparrow. Ecology 52:1065–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph DC, Conner RN, Schaefer RR, Koerth NE (2007) Red-cockaded woodpecker foraging behavior. Wilson J Ornithol 119:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selander RK (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg I, Hogstad O (2004) Sexual dimorphism in relation to winter foraging in the white-backed woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos). J Ornithol 145:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutchbury BJM, Woolfenden BE, Fedy BC, Morton ES (2005) Nonbreeding territorial behavior of two congeneric antbirds, chestnut-backed antbird (Myrmeciza exsul) and white-bellied antbird (M. longipes). Ornithol Neotrop 16:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunde P, Bølstad MS, Møller JD (2003) Reversed sexual dimorphism in tawny owls, Strix aluco, correlates with duty division in breeding effort. Oikos 101:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Johnson SG (1986) Foraging decisions of American robins: somatic and reproductive tradeoffs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temeles EJ (1986) Reversed sexual size dimorphism: effect on resource defense and foraging behaviors of nonbreeding northern harriers. Auk 103:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Temeles EJ, Roberts WM (1993) Effect of sexual dimorphism in bill length on foraging behavior: an experimental analysis of hummingbirds. Oecologia 94:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1996) Trapline foraging by bumblebees: I. Persistence of flight-path geometry. Behav Ecol 7:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman FE (1986) Sexual differences in spatial distribution of foraging white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis). Auk 103:421–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe KL (2008) Division of labour during incubation in a woodpecker Colaptes auratus with reversed sex roles and facultative polyandry. Ibis 150:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe KL, Moore WS (2008) Northern flicker (Colaptes auratus). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/species/166a. Accessed 26 Sept 2014

  • Williams JB (1980) Intersexual niche partitioning in downy woodpeckers. Wilson Bull 92:439–451

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Allsop, B. Griffiths, H. Hanbridge, M. Mitsutani, A. Musgrove, and M. Van der Pol for their help in the field. This research was funded by the Kenneth Molson Foundation, National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery (KLW), NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship (EAG), the Society of Canadian Ornithologists, and the Isabel Maria López Matínez Memorial Scholarship (EAG).

Ethical standards

Our research was conducted in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines for birds and was approved by the University of Saskatchewan Animal Care Committee (Animal Care Permit 20010113).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Gow.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Pruett-Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gow, E.A., Wiebe, K.L. Northern flicker mates foraging on renewing patches within home ranges avoid competition not by separate niches but by segregation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 101–108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1822-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1822-8

Keywords

Navigation