Abstract
Purpose
We designed this study to determine how changes in coronal ankle alignment affect sagittal alignment of the foot. Specifically, we focused on the changes in medial longitudinal arch height, which could be reflected by the medial cuneiform height (MCH), Meary’s angle, and calcaneal pitch angle (CPA).
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic findings of 37 patients who underwent open ankle arthrodesis without inframalleolar correction (such as first metatarsal dorsal closing wedge osteotomy, calcaneal osteotomies, tendon transfers, or tarsal joint arthrodesis) of severe varus ankle arthritis. The inclusion criterion was a pre-operative tibial axis to talar dome angle of 80 degrees or less. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the post-operative decrease in MCH (≥ 2 mm or < 2 mm).
Results
A post-operative MCH decrease of ≥ 2 mm was observed in 43.2% (16 patients). Although the degree of coronal ankle varus correction was similar, the decrease in the Meary’s angle was significantly greater in the group with a post-operative MCH decrease of ≥ 2 mm than in those with < 2 mm (− 4.1 degrees vs. − 1.3 degrees, P = 0.01). The changes in CPA were not significantly different (P = 0.172).
Conclusion
Correction of ankle varus deformity via ankle arthrodesis could lead to a decrease in the medial longitudinal arch height in less than half of the enrolled patients. In these patients, a cavus component of the foot might be an important factor in determining a successful sagittal foot alignment change, while the CPA was maintained post-operatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Lee HS, Wapner KL, Park SS, Kim JS, Lee DH, Sohn DW (2009) Ligament reconstruction and calcaneal osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 30(6):475–480
Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S (1995) Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(1):50–54
Choi JY, Cho JH, Song TH, Suh JS (2022) Radiographic outcomes of proximal vs distal syndesmotic low tibial osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 43(2):211–222
Choi JY, Kim KW, Suh JS (2020) Low tibial valgization osteotomy for more severe varus ankle Arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 41(9):1122–1132
Park CH, Kim JB, Kim J, Yi Y, Lee WC (2021) Joint preservation surgery for varus ankle arthritis with large talar tilt. Foot Ankle Int 42(12):1554–1564
Morash J, Walton DM, Glzabrook M (2017) Ankle arthrodesis versus total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 22(2):251–266
Choi JY, Song SJ, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Park JS, Suh JS (2018) Changes in hindfoot alignment after high or low tibial osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 39(9):1097–1105
Son HS, Choi JG, Ahn J, Jeong BO (2021) Hindfoot alignment change after total ankle arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int 42(4):431–439
Chun DI, Kim J, Won SH et al (2021) Changes in coronal alignment of the knee joint after supramalleolar osteotomy. Biomed Res Int 6664279:6664279
Maynou C, Szymanski C, Thiounn A (2017) The adult cavus foot. EFORT Open Rev 2(5):221–229
Younger AS, Hansen ST Jr (2005) Adult cavovarus foot. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(5):302–315
Kim HJ, Suh DH, Yang JH et al (2017) Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int Orthop 41(1):101–109
Decker RG, Kadakia AR (2017) Anterior approach for ankle arthrodesis. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 7(2):e10
Gordon D, Zicker R, Cullen N, Singh D (2013) Open ankle arthrodeses via an anterior approach. Foot Ankle Int 34(3):386–391
Kim JG, Ha DJ, Gwak HC, Kim CW, Kim JH (2018) Lee SJ (2018) Ankle arthrodesis: a comparison of anterior approach and transfibular approach. Clin Orthop Surg 10(3):368–373
Akra GA, Middleton A, Adedapo AO, Port A, Finn P (2010) Outcome of ankle arthrodesis using a transfibular approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 49(6):508–512
Steginsky BD, Suhling ML, Vora AM (2020) Ankle arthrodesis with anterior plate fixation in patients at high risk for nonunion. Foot Ankle Spec 13(3):211–218
Guo C, Yan Z, Barfield WR, Hartsock LA (2010) Ankle arthrodesis using anatomically contoured anterior plate. Foot Ankle Int 31(6):492–498
van den Heuvel SBM, Doorgakant A, Birnie MFN, Blundell CM, Schepers T (2021) Open ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of approaches and fixation methods. Foot Ankle Surg 27(3):339–347
Choi JY, Lee HI, Kim JH, Suh JS (2021) Radiographic measurements on hindfoot alignment view in 1128 asymptomatic subjects. Foot Ankle Surg 27(4):366–370
Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, Best AJ, Taylor GJ, Menon DK (2007) Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg 46(2):65–75
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353
Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM (2005) Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure. Foot Ankle Int 26(11):968–983
Kobayashi T, Koshino Y, Miki T (2021) Abnormalities of foot and ankle alignment in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):683
Vier D, Irwin TA (2022) Open ankle arthrodesis for deformity correction. Foot Ankle Clin 27(1):199–216
Apostle KL, Sangeorzan BJ (2012) Anatomy of the varus foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 17(1):1–11
Di Fabio R, Lispi L, Santorelli FM et al (2015) Idiopathic pes cavus in adults is not associated with neurophysiological impairment in the lower limbs. Neurol Sci 36(12):2287–2290
Ornig M, Tschauner S, Holweg PL et al (2021) A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification. Wien Klin Wochenschr 133(5–6):209–215
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JYC wrote the article and organized the data, participated in the design of the study, and performed the statistical analysis. SJP sorted the involved patients with a review of medial record. JSS conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the appropriate institutional ethics review committee and performed according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients.
Consent to publication
Authors agree to publication. This manuscript has not been published in any journals.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, J.Y., Park, S.J. & Suh, J.S. Does ankle arthrodesis induce satisfactory changes in the medial longitudinal arch height of the foot for severe varus ankle arthritis?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 107–115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05645-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05645-1