Skip to main content
Log in

Does ankle arthrodesis induce satisfactory changes in the medial longitudinal arch height of the foot for severe varus ankle arthritis?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 28 February 2023

Abstract

Purpose

We designed this study to determine how changes in coronal ankle alignment affect sagittal alignment of the foot. Specifically, we focused on the changes in medial longitudinal arch height, which could be reflected by the medial cuneiform height (MCH), Meary’s angle, and calcaneal pitch angle (CPA).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic findings of 37 patients who underwent open ankle arthrodesis without inframalleolar correction (such as first metatarsal dorsal closing wedge osteotomy, calcaneal osteotomies, tendon transfers, or tarsal joint arthrodesis) of severe varus ankle arthritis. The inclusion criterion was a pre-operative tibial axis to talar dome angle of 80 degrees or less. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the post-operative decrease in MCH (≥ 2 mm or < 2 mm).

Results

A post-operative MCH decrease of ≥ 2 mm was observed in 43.2% (16 patients). Although the degree of coronal ankle varus correction was similar, the decrease in the Meary’s angle was significantly greater in the group with a post-operative MCH decrease of ≥ 2 mm than in those with < 2 mm (− 4.1 degrees vs. − 1.3 degrees, P = 0.01). The changes in CPA were not significantly different (P = 0.172).

Conclusion

Correction of ankle varus deformity via ankle arthrodesis could lead to a decrease in the medial longitudinal arch height in less than half of the enrolled patients. In these patients, a cavus component of the foot might be an important factor in determining a successful sagittal foot alignment change, while the CPA was maintained post-operatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Lee HS, Wapner KL, Park SS, Kim JS, Lee DH, Sohn DW (2009) Ligament reconstruction and calcaneal osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 30(6):475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S (1995) Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(1):50–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi JY, Cho JH, Song TH, Suh JS (2022) Radiographic outcomes of proximal vs distal syndesmotic low tibial osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 43(2):211–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi JY, Kim KW, Suh JS (2020) Low tibial valgization osteotomy for more severe varus ankle Arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 41(9):1122–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park CH, Kim JB, Kim J, Yi Y, Lee WC (2021) Joint preservation surgery for varus ankle arthritis with large talar tilt. Foot Ankle Int 42(12):1554–1564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morash J, Walton DM, Glzabrook M (2017) Ankle arthrodesis versus total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 22(2):251–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi JY, Song SJ, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Park JS, Suh JS (2018) Changes in hindfoot alignment after high or low tibial osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 39(9):1097–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Son HS, Choi JG, Ahn J, Jeong BO (2021) Hindfoot alignment change after total ankle arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int 42(4):431–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chun DI, Kim J, Won SH et al (2021) Changes in coronal alignment of the knee joint after supramalleolar osteotomy. Biomed Res Int 6664279:6664279

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maynou C, Szymanski C, Thiounn A (2017) The adult cavus foot. EFORT Open Rev 2(5):221–229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Younger AS, Hansen ST Jr (2005) Adult cavovarus foot. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(5):302–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HJ, Suh DH, Yang JH et al (2017) Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int Orthop 41(1):101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Decker RG, Kadakia AR (2017) Anterior approach for ankle arthrodesis. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 7(2):e10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon D, Zicker R, Cullen N, Singh D (2013) Open ankle arthrodeses via an anterior approach. Foot Ankle Int 34(3):386–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JG, Ha DJ, Gwak HC, Kim CW, Kim JH (2018) Lee SJ (2018) Ankle arthrodesis: a comparison of anterior approach and transfibular approach. Clin Orthop Surg 10(3):368–373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Akra GA, Middleton A, Adedapo AO, Port A, Finn P (2010) Outcome of ankle arthrodesis using a transfibular approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 49(6):508–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steginsky BD, Suhling ML, Vora AM (2020) Ankle arthrodesis with anterior plate fixation in patients at high risk for nonunion. Foot Ankle Spec 13(3):211–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo C, Yan Z, Barfield WR, Hartsock LA (2010) Ankle arthrodesis using anatomically contoured anterior plate. Foot Ankle Int 31(6):492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van den Heuvel SBM, Doorgakant A, Birnie MFN, Blundell CM, Schepers T (2021) Open ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of approaches and fixation methods. Foot Ankle Surg 27(3):339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi JY, Lee HI, Kim JH, Suh JS (2021) Radiographic measurements on hindfoot alignment view in 1128 asymptomatic subjects. Foot Ankle Surg 27(4):366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, Best AJ, Taylor GJ, Menon DK (2007) Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg 46(2):65–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM (2005) Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure. Foot Ankle Int 26(11):968–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kobayashi T, Koshino Y, Miki T (2021) Abnormalities of foot and ankle alignment in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):683

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vier D, Irwin TA (2022) Open ankle arthrodesis for deformity correction. Foot Ankle Clin 27(1):199–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Apostle KL, Sangeorzan BJ (2012) Anatomy of the varus foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 17(1):1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Di Fabio R, Lispi L, Santorelli FM et al (2015) Idiopathic pes cavus in adults is not associated with neurophysiological impairment in the lower limbs. Neurol Sci 36(12):2287–2290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ornig M, Tschauner S, Holweg PL et al (2021) A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification. Wien Klin Wochenschr 133(5–6):209–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JYC wrote the article and organized the data, participated in the design of the study, and performed the statistical analysis. SJP sorted the involved patients with a review of medial record. JSS conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Soo Suh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the appropriate institutional ethics review committee and performed according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients.

Consent to publication

Authors agree to publication. This manuscript has not been published in any journals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 144 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J.Y., Park, S.J. & Suh, J.S. Does ankle arthrodesis induce satisfactory changes in the medial longitudinal arch height of the foot for severe varus ankle arthritis?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 107–115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05645-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05645-1

Keywords

Navigation