Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of lengthening speed on the quality of callus and complications in patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the effect of lengthening speed on the quality of callus and complications during distraction osteogenesis and describe an optimal lengthening speed in patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia (CPT).

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with CPT with a minimum follow-up of 36 months who underwent limb lengthening surgery between 1997 and 2016 with external fixator only were included in this study. All patients underwent lengthening procedures after achieving complete bone union in this study. Regenerate quality is evaluated according to the Li classification on the X-ray taken one month after the end of the distraction period. Complications were noted in post-operative follow-up period. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to obtain optimal lengthening speed for these patients.

Result

The mean age at the time of surgery was 5.74 years. The mean lengthening speed was 0.596 mm/day. Follow-up period of 136.14 months with a mean lengthening period of 92.4 days. Mean amount of lengthening was 5.44 cm for patients with CPT. Total rate of callus with good morphological quality was calculated as 66%.

According to ROC analysis, optimal cut-off values of lengthening speed for the obtaining good morphological quality callus was 0.564 mm/day for tibial lengthening in CPT. There was a significantly positive correlation between complication rate and lengthening speed for each group.

Conclusion

We recommend a mean lengthening rate of 0.56mm/day for the lengthening procedures with external fixator in patients with CPT who had complete bone union at the area of pseudarthrosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Knutson GA (2005) Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: a review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part II. The functional or unloaded leg-length asymmetry. Chiropr Osteopat 13:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rozbruch SR, Kleinman D, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov S (2008) Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a casematched comparison. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(12):2923–2932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ilizarov GA (1989) The tension-stress effect onthe genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and softtissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 238:249–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li R, Saleh M, Yang L, Coulton L (2006) Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction. J Orthop Res 24(3):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford AH (1986) Neurofibromatosis in children. Acta Orthop Scand 218:1–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer U, Meyer T, Schlegel W, Scholz H, Joos U (2001) Tissue differentiation and cytokine synthesis during strain-related bone formation in distraction osteogenesis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(1):22–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Simpson AH, Williams PE, Kyberd P, Goldspink G, Kenwright J (1995) The response of muscle to leg lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77(4):630–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li G, Simpson AH, Kenwright J, Triffitt JT (1999) Effect of lengthening rate on angiogenesis during distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res 17(3):362–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li G, Virdi AS, Ashhurst DE, Simpson AH, Triffitt JT (2000) Tissues formed during distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit are determined by the distraction rate: localization of the cells that express the mRNAs and the distribution of types I and II collagens. Cell Biol Int 24(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tensionstress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:8–26

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vade A, Eissenstat R (1990) Radiographic features of bone lengthening procedures. Radiology 174(2):531–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kenwright J, White SH (1993) A historical review of limb lengthening and bone transport. Injury 24(Suppl 2):S9–S19

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.İ.B.: conceived and planned the study; S.B.: drafting the manuscript; T.P.: designed and analyzed the data of manuscript; F.B.A.: acquisition of data; L.E.: critical revision; C.Ş.: revised the manuscript; M.K.: critical revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Bayram.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Approval was given by the institutional review board (IRB) and that informed consent was obtained from each patient (06.01.2017).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and their parents included in the study.

Consent for publication

Study participant consent for publication was obtained all individual participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of evidence: Level 4 retrospective study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balci, H.İ., Bayram, S., Pehlivanoglu, T. et al. Effect of lengthening speed on the quality of callus and complications in patients with congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 1517–1522 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05011-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05011-7

Keywords

Navigation