Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to assess the functional results, quality of life, and complications in two groups of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) patients according to the type of surgical operations, joint preserving, or joint sacrificing surgery.
Methods
Fifty-two feet in forty-six patients with CMT who had undergone surgical deformity correction were divided into two groups based on the main surgical procedure for the correction: Class I (joint preserving surgery) and class II (joint sacrificing surgery). Foot ankle disability index (FADI) and short form 12 version 2 (SF12V2) were documented pre-operative and 12 months post-operative. The complications of both groups were monitored with a mean follow-up time of 20.5 months (range, 13–71.5).
Results
After surgical treatment, FADI scores showed differences (p=0.005) between both groups. The functional improvement was 29 (20–46; p<0.001) in class I and 10 (2–36; p=0.001) in class II. The patients in both groups acquired a better quality of life as demonstrated in physical component summary of SF12 but without statistically difference. Three feet needed reintervention in class I (two for cavovarus recurrence and one for hallux flexus) at the end of follow-up. In contrast, five feet needed a new operation for cavovarus recurrence, claw toes recurrence, and ankle osteoarthritis after the progression of the condition.
Discussion
An early surgical intervention to neutralize the deforming forces in CMT patients could be a useful strategy to delay or prevent the need for extensive reconstruction and potential future complications.
Conclusion
Based on the type of surgical intervention in CMT patients, the joint preserving surgery in addition to soft tissue balancing procedures obtained better functional outcomes and lower rate of complications when compared to the group of joint sacrificing surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable
References
Barreto LC, Oliveira FS, Nunes PS et al (2016) Epidemiologic study of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology 46:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443706
Ismailov S, Fedotov V, Dadali E et al (2001) A new locus for autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2F) maps to chromosome 7q11-q21. Eur J Hum Genet 9:646–650
Barton T, Winson I (2013) Joint sparing correction of cavovarus feet in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. What are the limits? Foot Ankle Clin 18:673–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2013.08.008
Coleman SS, Chesnut WJ (1977) A simple test for hindfoot flexibility in the cavovarus foot. Clin Orthop 123:60–62
Laurá M, Singh D, Ramdharry G et al (2018) Prevalence and orthopedic management of foot and ankle deformities in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Muscle Nerve 57:255–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25724
Levitt RL, Canale ST, Cooke AJ Jr, Gartland JJ (1973) The role of foot surgery in progressive neuromuscular disorders in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1396–1410
Mann DC, Hsu JD (1992) Triple arthrodesis in the treatment of fixed cavovarus foot deformity in adolescent patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle 13:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079201300101
Breusch SJ, Wenz W, Döderlein L (2000) Function after correction of a clawed great toe by a modified Robert Jones transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:250–254. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.82b210276
Leeuwesteijn AE, de Visser E, Louwerens JW (2010) Flexible cavovarus feet in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease treated with first ray proximal dorsiflexion osteotomy combined with soft tissue surgery: a short-term to mid-term outcome study. Foot Ankle Surg 16:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2009.10.002
McCluskey WP, Lovell WW, Cummings RJ (1989) The cavovarus foot deformity. Etiol Manag. Clin Orthop Relat Res 247:27–37
Martin RL, Burdett RG, Irrgang JJ (1999) Development of the foot and ankle disability index (FADI). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29:32–33
Mani SB, Do H, Vulcano E et al (2015) Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle. JBJS 97:662–667. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.33940
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SDA (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
Vinci P, Esposito C, Perelli SL, Antenor JAV, Thomas FP (2003) Overwork weakness in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:825–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04949-3
Faldini C, Traina F, Nanni M, Mazzotti A, Calamelli C, Fabbri D, Pungetti C, Giannini SJJ (2015) Surgical treatment of cavus foot in Charcot-Marie-tooth disease: a review of twenty-four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1–10. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00794
Dreher T, Beckmann NA, Wenz (2015) Surgical treatment of severe cavovarus foot deformity in Charcot-Marie-tooth disease. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 5:11. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.N.00005
Selber R, Filho ER, Dallalana R et al (2004) Supramalleolar derotation ostetotomy of the tibia with plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(8):1170–1175. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b8.14479
McNicol D, Leong JCY, Hsu LCS (1983) Supramalleolar derotation osteotomy for lateral tibial torsion and associated equinovarus deformity of the foot. J Bone Jt Surg-Ser B 65:166–170. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.65b26826623
Bosman HA, Robinson AHJF (2013) Treatment of ankle instability with an associated cavus deformity. Foot Ankle Clin 18:643–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2013.08.005
Simon A-L, Seringe R, Badina A, Khouri N, Glorion C, Wicart PJF (2019) Long term results of the revisited Meary closing wedge tarsectomy for the treatment of the fixed cavo-varus foot in adolescent with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle Surg 25:834–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.11.005
Zide JR, Myerson MS (2013) Arthrodesis for the cavus foot when, where, and how? Foot Ankle Clin N Am 18:755–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2013.08.012
Wetmore RS, Drennan JC (1989) Long-term results of triple arthrodesis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:417–422
Maynou C, Szymanski C, Thiounn A (2017) The adult cavus foot. EFORT Open Reviews 2017 2:5, 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160077
Ward CM, Dolan LA, Bennet DL, Morcuende JA, Cooper RR (2008) Long-term results of reconstruction for treatment of a flexible cavovarus foot in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2631–2642. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01356
Pfeffer GB, Michalski M, Nelson T, An TW, Metzger MJF (2020) Extensor tendon transfers for treatment of foot drop in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a biomechanical evaluation. Foot Ankle Int 41:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719901119
Guyton GP (2006) Current concepts review: orthopaedic aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle Int 27:1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602701125
Sivera R, Sevilla T, Vílchez JJ, Martinez-Rubio D, Chumillas MJ, Vazquez JF et al (2013) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: genetic and clinical spectrum in a spanish clinical series. Neurology 81:1617–1625. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a9f56a
Louwerens JWK (2018) Operative treatment algorithm for foot deformities in Charcot-Marie-Tooth. Oper Orthop Traumatol 30:130–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-018-0533-0
Pfeffer GB, Gonzalez T, Brodsky J et al (2020) A consensus statement on the surgical treatment of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Foot Ankle Int 41:870–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100720922220
Acknowledgements
We thank the participation of Eloisa Rubio Pérez (Statistics and Research Methodology Unit) for her help with methods and statistical analysis.
Code availability
Not applicable
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Sergio Tejero. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Sergio Tejero, and all authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
• Conceptualization: Sergio Tejero and Mario Herrera-Pérez
• Methodology: Sergio Tejero and Juan Chans-Veres
• Formal analysis and investigation: Sergio Tejero and Andrés Carranza-Bencano
• Writing - original draft preparation: Sergio Tejero
• Writing - review and editing: Ahmed Galoum, Daniel Poggio, and Victor Valderrabano
• Funding acquisition: Not applicable
• Resources: Not applicable
• Supervision: Ahmed Galoum, Daniel Poggio, and Victor Valderrabano
• Validation: Sergio Tejero and Juan Chans-Veres
• Visualization: Sergio Tejero, Juan Chans-Veres and Mario Herrera-Pérez.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from our institution’s ethical review committee (CEIC 1925-N-19).
Consent to participate
The authors affirm that all individuals consented to participate in this study.
Consent for publication
The authors affirm that participants provided informed consent for the publication of their data and photographs.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Level of evidence: Level IV, case series
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tejero, S., Chans-Veres, J., Carranza-Bencano, A. et al. Functional results and quality of life after joint preserving or sacrificing surgery in Charcot-Marie-Tooth foot deformities. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 2569–2578 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04978-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04978-7