Skip to main content
Log in

Does radial shock wave therapy works in pseudarthrosis? Prospective analysis of forty four patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

In this study, we analyze a new treatment option for pseudarthrosis using radial shock waves. The traditional treatment to pseudarthrosis is surgical. As an option to specific cases, focal shock waves seem to present good results with bone union without a subsequent surgical procedure. As radial shock waves reach less energy and less depth penetration than focal shock waves, they usually are not indicated for the treatment of pseudarthrosis of any bone segment. There are publications that show evidences of the action of radial shock waves stimulating bone consolidation in vitro, in animals and in humans. We will present a new option for failure of consolidation in superficial bones submitted to radial shock wave therapy.

Objective

To analyze the effectiveness of radial shock waves in the treatment of superficial bone pseudarthrosis.

Patients and methods

Between 2016 and 2019, we conducted a prospective study with 44 consecutive patients with pseudarthrosis. All patients had prior indication for treatment with surgery and were treated with radial shock waves as a nonsurgical treatment option. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically pre-treatment and 6 months after. Clinically, patients complained of pain and dysfunction, according to the segment affected, and radiographically, evidences of pseudarthrosis in at least two X-ray views. As the outcomes: satisfactory when there was bone union, no pain, and return function; unsatisfactory when there was no bone union and maintain pain and dysfunction. All patients were treated with the same equipment and by the same physician. The treatment consisted in 3 sessions with weekly interval; in each session, 3000 radial shock waves were applied with 4 bar of energy.

Results

After 6 months, clinical analysis and X-ray evidence on 77.2% of the patients presented bone union and clinical improvement classified as satisfactory result. There were no complications.

Conclusion

Treatment of pseudarthrosis in superficial bones with radial shock waves is effective and safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell A, Templeman D (2016) Nonunion of the femur and tibia: an update. Orthop Clin North Am 47(2):365–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, Alt V (2018) Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop 42(2):247–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaden W, Mittermayr R, Haffner N, Smolen D, Gerdesmeyer L, Wang CJ (2015) Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) - first choice treatment of fracture non-unions? Int J Surg 24(Pt B):179–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang CJ, Chen HS, Chen CE, Yang KD (2001) Treatment of nonunions of long bone fractures with shock waves. Clin Orthop Relat Res 387:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kertzman P, Lenza M, Pedrinelli A, Ejnisman B (2015) Shockwave treatment for musculoskeletal diseases and bone consolidation: qualitative analysis of the literature. Rev Ortop Bras 50(1):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gollwitzer H, Gloeck T, Roessner M, Langer R, Horn C, Gerdesmeyer L et al (2013) (2013) radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) induces new bone formation in vivo: results of an animal study in rabbits. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(1):126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz-Rodriguez L, Garcia-Marinez O, Arroyo-Morales M, Ramos-Torrecillas J, De Luna-Bertos E, Ruiz C (2012) Effect of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on proliferation, cell viability and phagocytosis of human osteoblasts (MG63). Adv Sci Lett 17:325–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gusmão CVB, Batista NA, Lemes VTV, Maia Neto WL, Faria LD, Alves JM, Belangero WD (2019) Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation, extracorporeal shockwaves and radial pressure waves on Akt, BMP-2, ERK-2, FAK and TGF-β1 during bone healing in rat Tibial defects. Ultrasound Med Biol 45(8):2140–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kertzman P, Császár NBM, Furia JP, Schmitz C (2017) Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is efficient and safe in the treatment of fracture nonunions of superficial bones: a retrospective case series. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):164–174

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng JH, Wang CJ (2015) Biological mechanism of shockwave in bone. Int J Surg 24(Part B):143–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Agostino MC, Craig K, Tibalt E, Respizzi S (2015) Shock wave as biological therapeutic tool: from mechanical stimulation to recovery and healing, through mechanotransduction. Int J Surg 24(Pt B):147–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang FS, Wang CJ, Chen YJ, Chang PR, Huang YT, Sun YC et al (2014) Ras induction of superoxide activates ERK-dependent angiogenic transcription factor HIF-1alpha and VEGF-A expression in shock wave-stimulated osteoblasts. J Biol Chem 279(11):10331–10337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić T, Avancini-Dobrović V, Sosa I, Cvijanovic O, Bobinac D (2018) Effect of radial shock wave therapy on long bone fracture repair. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 32(4):875–879

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Császár NB, Angstman NB, Milz S, Sprecher CM, Kobel P, Farhat M, Furia JP, Schmitz C (2015) Radial shock wave devices generate cavitation. PLoS One 10(10):e0140541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone0140541

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmitz C, Császár NB, Milz S, Schieker M, Maffulli N, Rompe JD, Furia JP (2015) Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database. Br Med Bull 116(1):115–138

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaden W, Fischer A, Sailler A (2001) Extracorporeal shock wave therapy of nonunion or delayed osseous union. Clin Orthop Relat Res 387:90–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuo SJ, Su IC, Wang CJ, Ko JY (2015) Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of atrophic non-unions of femoral shaft fractures. Int J Surg. 24(Pt B):131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cacchio A, Giordano L, Colafarina O, Rompe JD, Tavernese E, Ioppolo F, Flamini S, Spacca G, Santilli V (2009) Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy compared with surgery for hypertrophic long-bone nonunions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(11):2589–2597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Notarnicola A, Moretti L, Tafuri S, Gigliotti S, Russo S, Musci L, Moretti B (2010) Extracorporeal shockwaves versus surgery in the treatment of pseudoarthrosis of the carpal scaphoid. Ultrasound Med Biol 36(8):1306–1313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Beer T, Jurkowitsch J, Keuchel T, Schlintner C, Schaden W, Hausner T, Leixnering M (2019) Treatment of scaphoid waist nonunion by one, two headless compression screws or plate with or without additional extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(2):281–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Furia JP, Juliano PJ, Wade AM, Schaden W, Mittermayr R (2010) Shock wave therapy compared with intramedullary screw fixation for nonunion of proximal fifth metatarsal metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(4):846–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Birnbaum K, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH, Heller KD (2002) Use of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of non-unions. A review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122(6):324–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petrisor B, Lisson S, Sprague S (2009) Extracorporeal shockwave therapy: A systematic review of its use in fracture management. Indian J Orthop 43(2):161–167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Willems A, van der Jagt OP, Meuffels DE (2019) Extracorporeal shock wave treatment for delayed union and nonunion fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 33(2):97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Silk ZM, Alhuwaila RS, Calder JD (2012) Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy to treat lesser metatarsal fracture nonunion: case report. Foot Ankle Int 33(12):1128–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo F. Kertzman.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo under number 12558513.1.000.5479.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kertzman, P.F., Fucs, P.M.B. Does radial shock wave therapy works in pseudarthrosis? Prospective analysis of forty four patients. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 43–49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04778-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04778-5

Keywords

Navigation