Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New growth rod concept provides three dimensional correction, spinal growth, and preserved pulmonary function in early-onset scoliosis

  • Invited Papers
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study aims to describe a novel minimal invasive early-onset scoliosis (EOS) growth rod concept, the Cody Bünger (CB) Concept, which combines concave interval distraction and contralateral-guided growth with apical control and to investigate the 3D deformity correction, the spinal growth, and the pulmonary development.

Method

A series of 38 children with progressive EOS and growth potential, receiving a highly specialized surgical treatment, including primary and conversion cases. Mean age was 10.2 years (4.4–15.8) with a mean follow-up of 5.6 years, and they underwent 168/184 open/magnetic lengthening procedures. Outcomes were as follows: scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis angles; apical rotation; spinal length; apical translation; coronal and sagittal vertical alignment; complications; and pulmonary function in a subgroup.

Results

Scoliosis improved from mean 76° (46–129) to 35° (8–74) post-op and was 42° (13–83) at end of treatment. Apical rotation was reduced by 30% but was partially lost during treatment. Thoracic kyphosis initially decreased by mean 15° and was partially lost during treatment. Lordosis was largely unaltered during treatment. Mean T1-S1 height increased from 30.7 cm (22.7–39.2) to 34.6 cm (27.8–45.1) postop and further increased to 38.5 cm (30.1–48.1) during treatment. This corresponded to a T1-S1 growth rate of 12 mm/year, and positive growth rates were found in all height parameters evaluated. Frontal balance and apical translation improved, whereas sagittal balance was unaltered. Complications occurred in 22/38 patients, and 11/38 had an unintended reoperation. Pulmonary function (FVC and FEV) increased but the relative lung function was unchanged.

Conclusion

The new growth rod concept provided 3D correction and spinal growth at complication rates comparable with other growth-friendly techniques for EOS, while pulmonary function was preserved. Single magnetic rod distraction was incorporated successfully, replacing surgical elongations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ et al (2014) Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1359–1367. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dimeglio A, Canavese F (2012) The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 21:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1983-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Branthwaite MA (1986) Cardiorespiratory consequences of unfused idiopathic scoliosis. Br J Dis Chest 80:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-0971(86)90089-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell RM, Smith MD, Mayes TC et al (2004) The effect of opening wedge thoracostomy on thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1659–1674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O et al (2005) Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:S46–S57. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000175190.08134.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung KMC, Cheung JPY, Samartzis D et al (2012) Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet 379:1967–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60112-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy RE, McCullough FL (2015) Shilla growth guidance for early-onset scoliosis: results after a minimum of five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1578–1584. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ouellet J (2011) Surgical technique: modern Luqué trolley, a self-growing rod technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1356–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1783-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Andras LM, Joiner ERA, McCarthy RE et al (2015) Growing rods versus Shilla growth guidance: better Cobb angle correction and T1-S1 length increase but more surgeries. Spine Deform 3:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS et al (2008) Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:984–990. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pratt RK, Webb JK, Burwell G, Cummings SL (1999) Luque trolley and convex epiphysiodesis in the management of infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1538–1547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Enercan M, Kahraman S, Erturer E et al (2014) Apical and intermediate anchors without fusion improve Cobb angle and thoracic kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3902–3908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3815-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lucas G, Bollini G, Jouve J-L et al (2013) Complications in pediatric spine surgery using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib: the French experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1589–E1599. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flynn JM, Tomlinson LA, Pawelek J et al (2013) Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1745–1750. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mardjetko SM, Hammerberg KW, Lubicky JP, Fister JS (1992) The Luque trolley revisited. Review of nine cases requiring revision. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:582–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Skov ST, Wijdicks SPJ, Bünger C et al (2018) Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a hybrid of a concave magnetic driver (magnetic controlled growth rod) and a contralateral passive sliding rod construct with apical control: preliminary report on 17 cases. Spine J 18:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nash CL, Moe JH (1969) A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:223–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lebecque P, Rosenthal M, Cole TJ et al (2008) Reference ranges for spirometry across all ages. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200708-1248oc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ et al (2012) Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 40:1324–1343. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell RMJ, Smith MD (2007) Thoracic insufficiency syndrome and exotic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:108–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, Cheung KMC et al (2014) Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study. Spine Deform 2:493–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamaci S, Demirkiran G, Ismayilov V et al (2014) The effect of dual growing rod instrumentation on the apical vertebral rotation in early-onset idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 34:607–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luhmann SJ, McCarthy RE (2017) A comparison of Shilla growth guidance system and growing rods in the treatment of spinal deformity in children less than 10 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e567–e574. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam GC, Hill DL, Le LH et al (2008) Vertebral rotation measurement: a summary and comparison of common radiographic and CT methods. Scoliosis 3:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-3-16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wijdicks SPJ, Tromp IN, Yazici M et al (2019) A comparison of growth among growth-friendly systems for scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine J 19:789–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoon WW, Sedra F, Shah S et al (2014) Improvement of pulmonary function in children with early-onset scoliosis using magnetic growth rods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnston CE, Tran D-P, McClung A (2017) Functional and radiographic outcomes following growth-sparing management of early-onset scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang Y, Zhao Y, Wang YP et al (2011) Lung function after growing rod surgery for progressive early-onset scoliosis: a preliminary study. Chin Med J 124:3858–3863. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.23.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bjure J, Nachemson A (1973) Non-treated scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 93:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197306000-00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kwan KYH, Alanay A, Yazici M et al (2017) Unplanned reoperations in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E1410–E1414. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldstein MJ, Kabirian N, Pawelek JB et al (2017) Quantifying anesthesia exposure in growing rod treatment for early onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e563–e566. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Lene Sloth, Kestutis Valancius, and Bente Schumacher for their contribution in the treatment of the patients, and Barbara Jensen and Jacob Brix for contributing to the database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cody Bünger.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Data collection was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (1-16-02-92-14) and the Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics (Ref. 126/2014).

Informed consent

Informed treatment consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of evidence: IV, prospective case series (Therapeutic)

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 2078 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skov, S.T., Li, H., Hansen, E.S. et al. New growth rod concept provides three dimensional correction, spinal growth, and preserved pulmonary function in early-onset scoliosis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1773–1783 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04604-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04604-y

Keywords

Navigation