Abstract
Introduction
This study aims to describe a novel minimal invasive early-onset scoliosis (EOS) growth rod concept, the Cody Bünger (CB) Concept, which combines concave interval distraction and contralateral-guided growth with apical control and to investigate the 3D deformity correction, the spinal growth, and the pulmonary development.
Method
A series of 38 children with progressive EOS and growth potential, receiving a highly specialized surgical treatment, including primary and conversion cases. Mean age was 10.2 years (4.4–15.8) with a mean follow-up of 5.6 years, and they underwent 168/184 open/magnetic lengthening procedures. Outcomes were as follows: scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis angles; apical rotation; spinal length; apical translation; coronal and sagittal vertical alignment; complications; and pulmonary function in a subgroup.
Results
Scoliosis improved from mean 76° (46–129) to 35° (8–74) post-op and was 42° (13–83) at end of treatment. Apical rotation was reduced by 30% but was partially lost during treatment. Thoracic kyphosis initially decreased by mean 15° and was partially lost during treatment. Lordosis was largely unaltered during treatment. Mean T1-S1 height increased from 30.7 cm (22.7–39.2) to 34.6 cm (27.8–45.1) postop and further increased to 38.5 cm (30.1–48.1) during treatment. This corresponded to a T1-S1 growth rate of 12 mm/year, and positive growth rates were found in all height parameters evaluated. Frontal balance and apical translation improved, whereas sagittal balance was unaltered. Complications occurred in 22/38 patients, and 11/38 had an unintended reoperation. Pulmonary function (FVC and FEV) increased but the relative lung function was unchanged.
Conclusion
The new growth rod concept provided 3D correction and spinal growth at complication rates comparable with other growth-friendly techniques for EOS, while pulmonary function was preserved. Single magnetic rod distraction was incorporated successfully, replacing surgical elongations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ et al (2014) Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1359–1367. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00253
Dimeglio A, Canavese F (2012) The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 21:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1983-3
Branthwaite MA (1986) Cardiorespiratory consequences of unfused idiopathic scoliosis. Br J Dis Chest 80:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-0971(86)90089-6
Campbell RM, Smith MD, Mayes TC et al (2004) The effect of opening wedge thoracostomy on thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1659–1674
Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O et al (2005) Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:S46–S57. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000175190.08134.73
Cheung KMC, Cheung JPY, Samartzis D et al (2012) Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet 379:1967–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60112-3
McCarthy RE, McCullough FL (2015) Shilla growth guidance for early-onset scoliosis: results after a minimum of five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1578–1584. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01083
Ouellet J (2011) Surgical technique: modern Luqué trolley, a self-growing rod technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1356–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1783-4
Andras LM, Joiner ERA, McCarthy RE et al (2015) Growing rods versus Shilla growth guidance: better Cobb angle correction and T1-S1 length increase but more surgeries. Spine Deform 3:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.11.005
Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS et al (2008) Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:984–990. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e
Pratt RK, Webb JK, Burwell G, Cummings SL (1999) Luque trolley and convex epiphysiodesis in the management of infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1538–1547
Enercan M, Kahraman S, Erturer E et al (2014) Apical and intermediate anchors without fusion improve Cobb angle and thoracic kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3902–3908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3815-3
Lucas G, Bollini G, Jouve J-L et al (2013) Complications in pediatric spine surgery using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib: the French experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1589–E1599. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000014
Flynn JM, Tomlinson LA, Pawelek J et al (2013) Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1745–1750. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01386
Mardjetko SM, Hammerberg KW, Lubicky JP, Fister JS (1992) The Luque trolley revisited. Review of nine cases requiring revision. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:582–589
Skov ST, Wijdicks SPJ, Bünger C et al (2018) Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a hybrid of a concave magnetic driver (magnetic controlled growth rod) and a contralateral passive sliding rod construct with apical control: preliminary report on 17 cases. Spine J 18:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.027
Nash CL, Moe JH (1969) A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:223–229
Lebecque P, Rosenthal M, Cole TJ et al (2008) Reference ranges for spirometry across all ages. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200708-1248oc
Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ et al (2012) Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 40:1324–1343. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080312
Campbell RMJ, Smith MD (2007) Thoracic insufficiency syndrome and exotic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:108–122
Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, Cheung KMC et al (2014) Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study. Spine Deform 2:493–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050
Kamaci S, Demirkiran G, Ismayilov V et al (2014) The effect of dual growing rod instrumentation on the apical vertebral rotation in early-onset idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 34:607–612
Luhmann SJ, McCarthy RE (2017) A comparison of Shilla growth guidance system and growing rods in the treatment of spinal deformity in children less than 10 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e567–e574. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000751
Lam GC, Hill DL, Le LH et al (2008) Vertebral rotation measurement: a summary and comparison of common radiographic and CT methods. Scoliosis 3:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-3-16
Wijdicks SPJ, Tromp IN, Yazici M et al (2019) A comparison of growth among growth-friendly systems for scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine J 19:789–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.017
Yoon WW, Sedra F, Shah S et al (2014) Improvement of pulmonary function in children with early-onset scoliosis using magnetic growth rods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000383
Johnston CE, Tran D-P, McClung A (2017) Functional and radiographic outcomes following growth-sparing management of early-onset scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00796
Jiang Y, Zhao Y, Wang YP et al (2011) Lung function after growing rod surgery for progressive early-onset scoliosis: a preliminary study. Chin Med J 124:3858–3863. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.23.005
Bjure J, Nachemson A (1973) Non-treated scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 93:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197306000-00007
Kwan KYH, Alanay A, Yazici M et al (2017) Unplanned reoperations in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E1410–E1414. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297
Goldstein MJ, Kabirian N, Pawelek JB et al (2017) Quantifying anesthesia exposure in growing rod treatment for early onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e563–e566. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000740
Acknowledgments
We thank Lene Sloth, Kestutis Valancius, and Bente Schumacher for their contribution in the treatment of the patients, and Barbara Jensen and Jacob Brix for contributing to the database.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Data collection was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (1-16-02-92-14) and the Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics (Ref. 126/2014).
Informed consent
Informed treatment consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Level of evidence: IV, prospective case series (Therapeutic)
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 2078 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skov, S.T., Li, H., Hansen, E.S. et al. New growth rod concept provides three dimensional correction, spinal growth, and preserved pulmonary function in early-onset scoliosis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1773–1783 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04604-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04604-y