Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiological outcome of intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked plate (LP) in patients affected by fracture of the distal tibia (DTF). We performed also an analysis to identify predictive factors of unfavourable outcome.
Methods
Data about patients with DTF treated at our first level trauma centre between 2008 and 2017 were collected. Patients were divided in group 1 (IMN) and group 2 (LP). The inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years at the time of diagnosis and unilateral DTF (closed or Gustilo 1). Demographic variables and data related to surgical procedure and hospitalization were registered. X-ray at follow-up was reviewed to identify malunions and nonunions. Clinical outcome was evaluated using scores and registering any complication.
Results
One hundred two patients were included in group 1 and 81 in group 2. In group 2 were documented higher operating time and hospitalization. The mean union time was 20.2 weeks for IMN and 24.8 weeks for LP group (p = 0.271). The rate of infections and wound complications was higher in group 2 while malunion and anterior knee pain were more frequent in group 1. No difference in scores for clinical outcome was documented after six months. The full-weight bearing time was significantly longer in the LP group (p = 0.019). At multivariate analysis, no variables showed a predictive power for unfavourable outcome.
Conclusions
Clinical and radiological results of LP and IMN appear similar. No predictive factors of unfavourable outcome were identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freedman EL, Johnson EE (1995) Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 315:25–33
Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen SH, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoe U, Rasmussen SB (2015) Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury 46(4):746–750
Im GI, Tae SK (2005) Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma 59:1219–1223
Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A (2008) Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures: plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 22:307–311
Mioc ML, Prejbeanu R, Deleanu B, Anglitoiu B, Haragus H, Niculescu M (2018) Extra-articular distal tibia fractures controversies regarding treatment options. A single-centre prospective comparative study. Int Orthop 42(4):915–919
Ebraheim NA, Evans B, Liu X, Tanios M, Gillette M, Liu J (2017) Comparison of intramedullary nail, plate, and external fixation in the treatment of distal tibia nonunions. Int Orthop 41(9):1925–1934
Jain D, Selhi HS, Yamin M, Mahindra P (2017) Soft tissue complications in distal tibial fractures managed with medial locking plates: a myth or reality? J Clin Orthop Trauma 8(Suppl 2):S90–S95
Li Y, Liu L, Tang X, Pei F, Wang G, Fang Y, Zhang H, Crook N (2012) Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures. Int Orthop 36:1457–1462
Costa ML, Achten J, Griffin J, Petrou S, Pallister I, Lamb SE, Parsons NR, FixDT Trial Investigators (2017) Effect of locking plate fixation vs intramedullary nail fixation on 6-month disability among adults with displaced fracture of the distal tibia: the UK FixDT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1767–1776
Zou J, Zhang W, Zhang CQ (2013) Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of extra-articular distal tibia fractures. Injury 44:1102–1106
Cheng W, Li Y, Manyi W (2011) Comparison study of two surgical options for distal tibia fracture-minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs. open reduction and internal fixation. Int Orthop 35:737–742
Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A (2007) Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop 31(5):709–714
Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM (2011) Randomized, prospective comparison of plate vs intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25(12):736–741
Guo JJ, Tang N, Yang HL, Tang TS (2010) A prospective, randomized trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 92:984–988
Polat A, Kose O, Canbora K, Yanık S, Guler F (2015) Intramedullary nailing vs minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal extra-articular tibial fractures: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sci 20:695–701
Fang JH, Wu YS, Guo XS, Sun LJ (2016) Comparison of 3 minimally invasive methods for distal tibia fractures. Orthopedics 39:627–633
Li Y, Jiang X, Guo Q, Zhu L, Ye T, Chen A (2014) Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by 3 different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study. Int Orthop 38:1261–1267
Maredza M, Petrou S, Dritsaki M, Achten J, Griffin J, Lamb SE, Parsons NR, Costa ML (2018) A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation and locking plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with an extra-articular fracture of the distal tibia. Bone Joint J 100(5):624–633
Taylor BC, Hartley BR, Formaini N, Bramwell TJ (2015) Necessity for fibular fixation associated with distal tibia fractures. Injury 46:2438–2442
Torino D, Mehta S (2016) Fibular fixation in distal tibia fractures: reduction aid or nonunion generator? J Orthop Trauma 30(Suppl 4):S22–S25
Berlusconi M, Busnelli L, Chiodini F, Portinaro N (2014) To fix or not to fix? The role of fibular fixation in distal shaft fractures of the leg. Injury 45(2):408–411
Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Sanders DW, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P, Walter SD, Zdero R, SPRINT Investigators (2012) Prognostic factors for predicting outcomes after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1786–1793
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The Local Research Ethics Service approved the study, which was conducted following the principles of Declaration of Helsinki. All patients signed informed consent.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaienti, E., Schiavi, P., Ceccarelli, F. et al. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: prospective comparative study evaluating two surgical procedures with investigation for predictive factors of unfavourable outcome. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 201–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4121-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4121-6