Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

History of club-foot treatment; part II: tenotomy in the nineteenth century

  • Orthopaedic Heritage
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital orthopaedic anomalies and was described by Hippocrates in the year 400 BC. From manipulation in antiquity to splint and plaster in the Renaissance the treatment had improved before tenotomy. Tenotomy was tested during the 19th century and will be explained in this manuscript; the introduction of subcutaneous tenotomy of the Achilles tendon had focused the attention of surgeons on the surgical treatment of clubfeet. While this operation was very successful in the correction of equinus deformities due to poliomyelitis, cerebral palsy, and old injuries, it was not a panacea for the patient with the congenital clubfoot. To be successful, the forefoot adduction and inversion had to be corrected completely before correction of the equinus deformity could benefit the patient. For this reason operations were extended to include tenotomies of other tendons, particularly the anterior tibial tendon and incisions in the capsules of the talar joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hernigou P, Huys M, Pariat J, Jammal S (2017) History of clubfoot treatment, part I: From manipulation in antiquity to splint and plaster in Renaissance before tenotomy. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-017-3487-1

  2. Thilenius MG (1789) Medicinische und chirurgische Bemerkungen. Frankfurt am Main

  3. Le Vay D (1976) Scenes from surgical life. Peter Owen, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michaelis CF (1811) Uber die Schwachung der Sehnen durch Einschneidung als einem Mittel bei manchen Gliederverunstaltungen. J Prakt Heilk Berlin 33(26, Part 11):4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heister L (1719) Chirurgie. Nuremberg

  6. Hernigou P (2016) Fathers of orthopaedics in Germany (eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries): Lorenz Heister in Helmsted; Johann Friedrich Dieffenbach in Berlin; Heine and family in Würzburg. Int Orthop 40(2):425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sudhoff K (1922) Klassiker der Medizin. Leipzig

  8. Molinelli PP (1745) De vulnerato AchiIlis tendinis. Comment Acad Sci Bonon 2:189

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hernigou P (2014) Bone transplantation and tissue engineering, part I. Mythology, miracles and fantasy: from chimera to the miracle of the black leg of saints Cosmas and Damian and the cock of John hunter. Int Orthop 38(12):2631–2638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ottley D (1835) The Life of John Hunter, F.KS. In The Works of John Hunter, F.R.S. (Ed) James F. Palmer London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1:33-34

  11. Bromfield W (1773) Chirurgical observations and cases. London

  12. Delpech JM (1816) Precis elementaire des maladies reputees chirurgicales. Paris

  13. Delpech JM (1828) Chirurgie clinique de Montpellier, vol. II, pp 177 and 231, Paris and Montpellier

  14. Delpech JM (1828) De I’Orthomorphie, vol n. Gabon, Paris, p 328

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delpech JM (1815) Memoire sur la complication desplaies et des ulceres connue sous le nom de pourriture d ‘hopital. Mequignonet Marvis, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wangensteen OH, Wangensteen SD (1978) The rise of surgery from empiric craft to scientific discipline. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  17. Delpech (1823) Chirurgie clinique de Montpellier; ou, observations et reflexions tirees des travaux de chirurgie clinique de cette ecole Paris et Montpellier. Gabon et Cie 1:147–231

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stromeyer L (1833) Die Durchschneidung des Achillessehne, als Heilmethode des Klumpfusses, durch zwei Falle erlautert. Mag. ges. Hielk. (Rust) 39(NF15):195

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hernigou P (2016) Authorities and foundation of an orthopaedic school in Germany in the nineteenth century: Part I: Conrad Johann Martin Langenbeck; Georg Friedrich Louis Stromeyer; Bernhard Rudolf Conrad von Langenbeck; Johann Friedrich August von Esmarch. Int Orthop 40(3):633–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stromeyer L (1834) Arch. Gen. MM

  21. Stromeyer (1838) Beitrage zur operativen Orthopddik. Helwing, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  22. Little WJ (1839) A treatise on the nature of club-foot and analogous distortions; including their treatment both with and without surgical operation. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Little WJ (1853) On the nature and treatment of deformities of the human frame. London

  24. Gibney VP (1912) Reminiscences of the orthopaedic surgeons of the latter half of the 19th century. N.Y. Med I(95):913

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adams W (1871) Club-foot: its causes, pathology and treatment. London

  26. Sayre LA (1876) Lectures on orthopedic surgery and diseases of the joints. New York

  27. Muetter TD (1839) A lecture on coxarthrosis, or club foot. Philadephia

  28. Detmold WL (1840) An essay on club-foot and some analogous diseases. New York

  29. Cohen J (1958) The Boston Orthopedic Institution. J Bone Joint Surg 40A:1176–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Scoutteten H (1839) Ueber radicale Heilung der Klumpfiisse, trans. W. Walther. Leopold Michelsen, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stewart FC (1843) The hospitals and surgeons of Paris. J. & H. Langley, New York, pp 295–300

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guérin J (1857) Institut orthopédique de la Muette pour le traitement des difformités de la taille et des membres chez les personnes des deux sexes, Édition: Paris. Impr. de A. Éverat

  33. Mott V (1842) Travels in Europe and the East. Harper & Brothers, New York, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peltier (1983) Guerin versus Malgaigne: a precedent for the free criticism of scientific papers. J Orthop Res 1:115–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Patel M (1955) Amedee Bonnet (1809–1858). Prog Med 83:287–290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonnet (1841) Traite des sections tendoneuses et musculaires. Charles Savy Jeune, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  37. Flaubert G (1857) Madame Bovary. Mœurs de province (Michel Lévy frères)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Surgery, University Paris East (UPEC), Hôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France

    Philippe Hernigou, Nicolas Gravina, Damien Potage & Arnaud Dubory

Authors
  1. Philippe Hernigou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas Gravina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Damien Potage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arnaud Dubory
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Hernigou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernigou, P., Gravina, N., Potage, D. et al. History of club-foot treatment; part II: tenotomy in the nineteenth century. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 2205–2212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3578-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3578-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation