Abstract
Introduction
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common injured knee ligaments and at the same time, one of the most frequent injuries seen in the sport orthopaedic practice. Due to the clinical relevance of ACL injuries, numerous papers focussing on this topic including biomechanical-, basic science-, clinical- or animal studies, were published. The purpose of this study was to determine the most frequently cited scientific articles which address this subject, establish a ranking of the 50 highest cited papers and analyse them according to their characteristics.
Methods
The 50 highest cited articles related to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury were searched in Thomson ISI Web of Science® by the use of defined search terms. All types of scientific papers with reference to our topic were ranked according to the absolute number of citations and analyzed for the following characteristics: journal title, year of publication, number of citations, citation density, geographic origin, article type and level of evidence.
Results
The 50 highest cited articles had up to 1624 citations. The top ten papers on this topic were cited 600 times at least. Most papers were published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine. The publication years spanned from 1941 to 2007, with the 1990s and 2000s accounting for half of the articles (n = 25). Seven countries contributed to the top 50 list, with the USA having by far the most contribution (n = 40). The majority of articles could be attributed to the category “Clinical Science & Outcome”. Most of them represent a high level of evidence.
Discussion
Scientific articles in the field of ACL injury are highly cited. The majority of these articles are clinical studies that have a high level of evidence. Although most of the articles were published between 1990 and 2007, the highest cited articles in absolute and relative numbers were published in the early 1980s. These articles contain well established scoring- or classification systems.
Conclusion
The identification of important papers will help current clinicians and scientists to get an overview on past and current trends in that special field of ACL injury and provides a basis for both further discussion as well as future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common injured knee ligaments and at the same time, one of the most frequent injuries seen in orthopaedic practice.
There are various predisposing factors for ACL injury, including neuromuscular and biomechanical abnormalities, mutations within collagen producing genes, female sex hormones, abnormal joint laxity, and primary structural influences of the knee [1,2,3,4].
ACL rupture is a serious knee injury that affects mainly physically active young people [5]. It is usually the result of a non-contact injury whereby a combination of movements such as femoral adduction and internal rotation, knee flexion, or tibial rotation with the foot and ankle in valgus result in partial or complete anterior cruciate ligament tears [6]. The injury is characterized by joint instability, which is associated with an increased risk of early secondary osteoarthritis of the knee [7]. Treatment options range from non-operative strategies including physiotherapy, bracing and the modification of physical activity, to surgical reconstruction of the ligament. Especially for sports-active patients and athletes, as well as for patients with complex knee (−ligament) injuries, the operative treatment seems to be the procedure of choice [8, 9].
Given the clinical relevance of this injury, numerous scientific papers focusing on this topic, including biomechanical-, basic science-, clinical- or animal studies, were published.
The purpose of this study was to determine the most frequently cited scientific articles which address the subject of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and to establish a ranking of the 50 highest cited papers by the use of the Thomson ISI Web of Science® Database.
Analyses of most cited papers have been performed in various medical disciplines such as orthopaedic surgery or plastic surgery, various diseases such as burns or osteoporosis and a variety of orthopaedic subspecialties including arthroplasty, shoulder-, foot- or hand surgery [10,11,12,13,14]. However, no such study has been done focusing on “ACL injury”.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the 50 highest cited articles in ACL injury research in order to provide clinicians, researchers, and trainees a list of “citation classics” on the topic of ACL injury, including an analysis of the papers’ characteristics (year of publication, number of citations, citation density, geographic origin, article type, and level of evidence).
Methods
Search strategy
In July 2016, Thomson ISI Web of Science® was searched for the following search terms “Cruciate”, “Cruciate Ligament”, “ACL”, “Gracilis”, “Gracilis Tendon” “Semitendinosus”, “Semitendinosus Tendon”, “Patella Tendon”, “Hamstring”, “Knee Ligament”, “Ligament” “Quadriceps Tendon”, “Instability”, “Joint Instability”, “PCL”, “Unhappy Triad”, “Arthroscopy”, “Reconstruction”, “Drawer Test”, “Drawer Sign”, “Lachmann”, “Pivot Shift”.
After completion of the search, the search output was recorded. Scientific papers with no direct reference to the topic were excluded. All types of scientific papers with reference to the ACL were included in the study and ranked according to the number of highest citations. In cases with identical absolute numbers of citations, papers with higher citation density (see below) were ranked higher. A list of the 50 highest cited articles was established. The initial search with the above described search terms was done by a medical student (J.D.). Subsequently the articles were analyzed by an Orthopaedic surgeon (L.A.H.) who decided which studies were included in the definitive list of the 50 highest cited articles in ACL injury.
Data analysis
Each of the 50 highest cited articles was reviewed for the following information in order to create a list: article title, journal title, year of publication, and origin of the corresponding author. Each paper was assigned to a single country according to the corresponding author’s address because of the corresponding author’s primary responsibility for the study [15].
In order to determine the relative impact of a published paper, the citation density, the number of citations per year since publication, was calculated as mentioned above [16].
Furthermore, the level of evidence of each clinical article irrespective of the journal, where it was published, was set using the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume authors’ guidelines that are published online [17].
All papers were sorted according to the scientific category including “Clinical Science & Outcome”, “Basic Science”, “Classification & Scoring System”, “Review & Meta-analysis”.
At last, all papers’ content was screened and each article was assigned to one of the following categories: “Anatomy & Biomechanics”, “Classification & Scoring System”, “Imaging”, “Injury Mechanism”, “Prevention & Rehabilitation”, “Surgical Technique & Outcome” and “Tissue Engineering”.
Results
The 50 highest cited articles on ACL injury were cited from 315 to 1624 times. The top ten papers according to absolute numbers were cited at least 600 times. The 50 highest cited papers according to the absolute number of citations can be seen in Table 1.
The majority of articles could be attributed to the category Clinical Science & Outcome (n = 20). Within this category, level of evidence could be analyzed in 14 clinical papers, primarily distributed in level II (n = 10) and level III (n = 3) papers. One paper was categorized as level of evidence V (expert opinion). The distribution of the other categories can be seen in Fig. 1.
Most papers (n = 22) were published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine. Other journals include the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery; American and British Volume, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Biomaterials, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Orthopaedics, Radiology, Clinical Biomechanics, Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Journal of Athletic Training and Arthritis and Rheumatism. The distribution of the highest cited papers in the various journals can be seen in Fig. 2.
Seven countries contributed to the top 50 list, with the USA having the most contributions (n = 40), followed by Sweden with three, the UK and Norway with two each, and Canada, Italy and South Korea with one each.
The number of highest cited papers according to the decade of publication can be found in Fig. 3. The majority of papers were published since 1990 (n = 32), the remaining publications are related to the 1970s and 1980s. Within the list of the 50 most cited articles with regard to our topic, none was published during the last six years.
The distribution of the various scientific topics covered in the list of the 50 highest cited articles can be seen in Fig. 4. Papers in in the basic scientific fields of “Anatomy & Biomechanics” were most frequent.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to determine the 50 highest cited articles in ACL injury research in order to provide clinicians, researchers, and trainees a list of “citation classics” on the topic of ACL injury, including an analysis of the papers’ characteristics, content, and clinical significance.
The ACL is one of the most common injured ligaments of the knee. Therefore, ACL injuries have a high impact on the individual, but also on healthcare systems worldwide. Given the strong scientific interest raised by this topic, both in the older as well as in current literature, we tried to identify the most significant articles on the subject of ACL injury. Therefore, we did a literature search based on Thomson ISI Web of Science®, in order to create a list of highest cited papers on that topic, regardless of the age and category of these articles.
Although a high number of total citations may not be the only parameter to determine the influence or clinical importance of an article, it can be considered as a parameter for the scientific relevance on a specialized subject [18,19,20, 23]. Furthermore, such an analysis allows identifying the research activity in various fields.
Articles on ACL injury were cited up to 1624 times, with the top ten articles on this topic being cited at least 600 times. These numbers are lower than the highest cited papers in the industry driven field of arthroplasty [15]. However, the number of citations seems to be quite high when compared to the most cited articles in the subspecialty “Orthopaedic Cartilage Surgery”, for example, which may be a comparable “hot topic” in the recent orthopaedic literature. The highest cited paper on this topic has reached 989 citations [19]. This is even more clear, when compared to highest cited papers in hand and shoulder surgery or paediatric orthopaedics [10,11,12,13,14].
The majority of articles could be attributed to the category Clinical Science & Outcome. Most of the articles in this group, on which a level of evidence could be assigned to, were based on level II and level III studies. Despite of one article, which was referred to as a level V article (expert opinion), no clinical studies with lower levels of evidence could reach a sufficient number of citations to join the list of the 50 highest cited papers. This will unlikely change or will even provide papers with a higher level of evidence in future publications due to the trend toward prospective-randomized trials and the focus on evidence-based medicine. [24].
These point to the fact that there are numerous high quality papers in the field of ACL injury research, especially when compared to other fields such as arthroplasty, where most papers were level of evidence IV [15].
The second frequent article type fell within the category of Basic Science. These articles are predominantly based on anatomic- and/or biomechanical cadaver studies. This shows that there is ongoing research incorporating novel techniques and technologies. Therefore, further “citation classics” are to be expected in this field. Interestingly, the three highest cited papers fall within the category “Classification & Scoring System”. These articles are simultaneously the ones with the highest citation density. These include the frequently applied and worldwide known Tegner-Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, initially developed for the evaluation of knee ligament injuries [21,22,23]. These manuscripts are the real “classics”, as they continue to be highly cited in research and are used in clinical practice frequently. A comparable high number of citations of classification or scoring systems have also been seen in other disciplines or subspecialities [25,26,27,28].
Particularly remarkable, when considering the article categories and contents, is the poor representation of papers focussing on surgical ACL repair techniques. The evolution of surgical treatment has undergone a paradigm shift over the decades, starting with the technique of open, primary repair of the ACL with all its biases as described in the corresponding literature. The subsequent developments, such as MRI and arthroscopy resulted in minimally-invasive techniques for ACL reconstruction- or augmentation. Solely, semitendinosus versus patellar tendon as an autograft used for ACL reconstruction were discussed in three of the listed papers. Anatomic and biomechanical studies, focussing mainly on anatomical, functional, and experimental analysis of the tissue-texture of both the ACL as well as ACL grafts, followed by clinical follow-up studies following ACL reconstruction and/or conservative treatment are the most contributing articles within the list of the “top 50” [29].
In total, seven countries contributed to the top 50 list, with the USA having by far the most contributions (n = 40). A fact that may reflect the high level of orthopaedic research in the United States. This is also confirmed by the publishing journals. A large proportion of the articles were published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine, followed by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. Similar results have been seen in other fields were the USA led most rankings [11,12,13, 27].
The oldest article in this category, focussing on the mechanics of the ligaments and menisci of the knee joint, was published in 1941 and is still cited 4.3 times per year in average [20].
A last interesting point is that the majority of the articles have been published between 1990 and 2005. Within the last ten years, no article on this topic has reached a comparably high number of citations. This might be due to cross-sectional design of the present study.
Bibliometric studies like ours reflect a “snapshot” of the most frequently cited articles in their specific field. Furthermore, the listing of articles according to the number of absolute citations remains a selection [30]. Important and influential articles on the topic might have been excluded. The citation numbers may be improperly increased by several practices including self-citations, subpublications, and timing of publication [31]. These limitations point out the necessity for other metrics to identify prestigious articles [30]. Although more objective journal metrics, for example the “SJR indicator” or the “Eigenfactor-score” with all their benefits, including the evaluation of the importance of citations from various sources, the eliminated influence of self-citations, and the greater number of journals and languages included in the database, it was not possible to establish a ranking of the most influential and important articles on a specific topic by using these scores since they were developed to measure the total importance of a scientific journal but not single articles [31]. A recent development is web platforms, which provide alternative metric scores for articles, for example article views, downloads or mentions in social media and news media [30,31,32]. Given the rapid development and growing importance of these platforms, altmetrics, as here provided, may have a huge impact on the assessment of the importance of articles and journals in the near future. Therefore, we decided to search for the most cited articles on our topic as has been done in various other fields. Since we have performed the search in the Thomson ISI Web of Science®, another specific limitation of our search strategy arises from the fact that articles published in non-indexed journals as well as articles cited in textbooks, lectures or digital media could not be taken into account [32].
Despite these limitations, we think that citation analysis remains one of the best currently available tools to assess the impact of scientific articles on their field [30].
We believe that studies like ours represent a valuable summary of scientific milestones on the topic of ACL injury. The diversity of the listed articles regarding the article types and study design for clinical papers as well as the heterogeneity of the content, ranging from biomechanical studies on native ligament and graft analyses to tissue engineering and reconstruction techniques, prevention measures, and outcome analyses following surgical, non-surgical or combined treatment strategies may reflect the comprehensive, active research conducted on this subject both current as well as in the past few decades. Furthermore, the results may reflect the quality of prior scientific research [30].
In summary, this article provides a selection of the most read and cited articles on the specific topic of ACL injury. This “reading list” may be helpful and interesting for both “unexperienced” readers as well as for senior readers or clinicians in order to provide a basis for both further discussion as well as future research.
References
Vaishya R, Hasija R (2013) Joint hypermobility and anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 21(2):182–184
Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Benjaminse A, Chaudhari AM, Collins M, Padua DA (2012) ACL research retreat VI: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention. J Athl Train 47(5):591–603
Evans S, Shaginaw J, Bartolozzi A (2014) Acl reconstruction - it’s all about timing. Int J Sports Phys Ther 9(2):268–273
Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Ingole S, Vijay V (2015) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review. Cureus 7(11):e378. doi: 10.7759/cureus.378
Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS (2010) A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior Crut tears. New Engl J Med 363(4):331–342
Brophy RH, Silvers HJ, Mandelbaum BR (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries: etiology and prevention. Sports Med Arthrosc 18(1):2–11
Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LD, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35:1756–1769
Alazzawi S, Sukeik M, Ibrahim M, Haddad FS (2016) Management of anterior cruciate ligament injury: pathophysiology and treatment. Br J Hosp Med 77(4):222–225
Kaar SG, Stuart MJ, Levy BA (2011) Soft-tissue injuries about the knee. In: Flynn J (ed) Orthopaedic knowledge update, 10th edn. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont
To P, Atkinson CT, Lee DH et al (2013) The most cited articles in hand surgery over the past 20-plus years: a modern-day reading list. J Hand Surg 38(5):983–987
Namdari S, Baldwin K, Kovatch K et al (2012) Fifty most cited articles in orthopaedic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(12):1796–1802
Cassar Gheiti AJ, Downey RE, Byrne DP et al (2012) The 25 most cited articles in arthroscopic orthopaedic surgery. Arthroscopy 28(4):548–564
Lefaivre KA, Guy P, O’Brien PJ et al (2010) Leading 20 at 20: top cited articles and authors in the journal of Orthopaedic trauma 1987–2007. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):53–58
Mehlman CT, Wenger DR (2006) The top 25 at 25: citation classics in the journal of pediatric Orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop 26(5):691–694
Holzer LA, Holzer G (2014) The 50 highest cited papers in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 29(3):453–457
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785
Instructions for authors. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery web site. Available from: URL: http://jbjs.org/public/instructionauthors.aspx
Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA (2002) Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA 287(21):2805–2808
Arshi A, Siesener NJ, McAllister DR, Williams R 3rd, Sherman SL, Jones KJ (2016) The 50 most cited articles in orthopedic Cartilage surgery. Cartilage 3:238–247
Brantigan OC, Voshell AF (1941) The mechanics of the ligaments and menisci of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 23(1):44–66
Tegner Y, Lysholm J. (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res (198):43–49
Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1992) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10(3):150–154
Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(2):88–96
Baldwin K, Namdari S, Donegan D, Kovatch K, Ahn J, Mehta S (2013) 100 most cited articles in fracture surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 42(12):547–552
Baltussen A, Kindler CH (2004) Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesth Analg 98(2):443–451
Nason GJ, Tareen F, Mortell A (2013) The top 100 cited articles in urology: an update. Can Urol Assoc J 7(1–2):E16–E24. doi:10.5489/cuaj.12223
Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O’Brien PJ (2011) 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(5):1487–1497
Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’Briain DE, Felle P, McCabe JP (2010) The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(10):1338–1343
Van der List JP, Di Felice GS (2016) Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: a paradigm shift. NCBI doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.09.006
Ahmad SS, Evangelopoulos DS, Abbasian M, Roder C, Kohl S (2014) The hundred most-cited publications in orthopaedic knee research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(22):e190. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.00029
Scarlat MM, Mavrogenis AF, Pećina M, Niculescu M (2015) Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with international Orthopaedics. Int Orthop 39(8):1459–1464
Jia Z, Ding F, Wu Y, He Q, Ruan D (2015) The 50 most-cited articles in orthopaedic surgery from mainland China. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(7):2423–2430
Acknowledgements
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Graz.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Vielgut, I., Dauwe, J., Leithner, A. et al. The fifty highest cited papers in anterior cruciate ligament injury. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1405–1412 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3513-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3513-3