Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study of outcomes after ankle arthrodesis shows higher complication rates in cases operated upon by general orthopaedic surgeons

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A functional assessment of 38 patients after ankle arthrodesis for the evaluation of the necessity of surgeons-specialisation was carried out by means of clinical evaluation and gait analysis after an average follow up of 30 months.

Methods

Scores were used to grade ankle function. Gate analysis was examined to determine the effect of arthrodesis on the ankle in relation to the surgeons’ experience. Under conditions of normal daily living, we found significant differences in life quality between patients operated upon by experts in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery (group A) and patients operated by general orthopaedic surgeons (group B).

Results

All patients in group A had orthograde stance. Wrong screw positioning and a failed neutral tibio-talar position were the main problems in group B. Due to this, the re-operation rate was 10%.

Conclusion

Our findings may have implications for surgical training programs and for regionalisation of complex surgical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coester L (2001) Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(2):219–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchner M, Sabo D (2003) External or internal fixation for arthrodesis of the ankle – a comparative study of perioperative and long term results. Unfallchirurg 106(6):472–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner M et al (2014) Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(2):135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saltzman CL, Amendola A, Anderson R et al (2003) Surgeons training and complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 24(6):514–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haskell A, Mann RA (2004) Perioperative complication rate of total ankle replacement is reduced by surgeon experience. Foot Ankle Int 25(5):283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A (2007) A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg 94(2):145–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Callahan MA, Christos PJ, Gold HT et al (2003) Influence of surgical subspecialty training on in-hospital mortality for gastrectomy and colectomy patients. Ann Surg 238(4):629–636

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS et al (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kristen KH, Trnka HJ (2007) Ankle arthrodesis with an anterior approach. Tech Foot Ankle Sur 6(4):243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Orlin MNMTG (2000) Plantar pressure assessment. Phys Ther 80(4):399–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saltzman CL, Zimmerman MB, O’Rourke M et al (2006) Impact of comorbidities on the measurement of health in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(11):2366–2372

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thevendran G, Wang C, Pinney SJ et al (2015) Nonunion risk assessment in foot and ankle surgery: proposing a predictive risk assessment model. Foot Ankle Int 36(8):901–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haddad SL, Coutzee JC, Estok R et al (2007) Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):1899–1905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Madeley NJ, Wing KJ, Topliss C et al (2012) Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, ankle osteoarthritis scale, AOFAS, ankle hindfoot score, and foot function index in end stage ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 33(1):57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hefti FL, Baumann JU, Morscher EW (1980) Ankle joint fusion—determination of optimal position by gait analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 96(3):187–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oglivie-Harris GJ, Fitsialos D, Hedman TP (1994) A comparison of two versus three screw fixation in a crossed configuration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:195–199

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schwienbacher S, Aghayev E, Hofmann UK et al (2015) Driving and emergency braking may be impaired after tibiotalar joint arthrodesis: conclusions after a case series. Int Orthop 39(7):1335–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thevendran G, Younger A, Pinney S (2012) Current concepts review: risk factors for nonunions in foot and ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 33(11):1031–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frigg A, Schäfer J, Dougall H et al (2012) The midfoot load shows impaired function after ankle arthrodesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(10):1064–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith TO, Hing CB (2010) The efficiency of the tourniquet in foot and ankle surgery? A systematic review and meta analysis. Foot Ankle Surg 16(1):3–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Braito M, Dammerer D, Kaufmann G et al (2014) Are our expectations bigger than the results we achieve? a comparative study analysing potential advantages of ankle arthroplasty over arthrodesis. Int Orthop 38(8):1647–1653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim HJ, Suh DH, Yang JH et al (2017) Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int Orthop 41(1):101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krenn Sabine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

No external funding was received.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabine, K., Sascha, A., Peter, B. et al. Comparative study of outcomes after ankle arthrodesis shows higher complication rates in cases operated upon by general orthopaedic surgeons. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1163–1168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3459-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3459-5

Keywords

Navigation