Skip to main content
Log in

Arthroscopic revision release of gluteal muscle contracture after failed primary open surgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The treatment of gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) after failed primary open release surgery has rarely been reported in the literature. GMC is a troublesome health problem in some developing countries, and it can result in the limitation of patients’ hip function, leading to the development of inferiority complexes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of arthroscopic revision surgery after failed primary open release on patients with GMC.

Methods

A total of 278 hips of 140 patients who underwent arthroscopic revision procedures after failed primary open surgeries were gathered from the department files. All patients were treated using a “three-step” arthroscopic release procedure by the same surgeon group.

Results

The mean follow-up for the 136 patients was 38.9 months. There was significant difference (P < 0.05) between the patients’ mean post-revision and pre-operative results on the Harris scoring system. Unreleased contracture tissues that needed revision operations included the gluteus maximus, tensor fasciae latae muscle, and gluteus medius in all patients, and the gluteus minimus and hip capsule in 11.0% and 8.1% of patients, respectively. Short-term complications included subcutaneous bruising of the abdomen in 11 patients, extensive ecchymosis in the lateral thigh in 12 patients, and a transient reduction of muscle strength in all patients. No complications involving postoperative incision infection, nerve and blood vessel damage, or positive Trendelenburg sign occurred. Symptoms of hip snapping and limitation of range of motion (ROM), combined with a positive Trendelenburg sign in two patients after the primary open surgery, were all resolved except for the Trendelenburg sign through arthroscopic revision release. The overall satisfaction rate of the revision operations was 90.4%.

Conclusion

The three-step arthroscopic release procedure is effective for failed primary open GMC surgeries as shown by improved post-operative function and patient satisfaction regardless of which primary procedure was performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu GH, Cao FQ, Yang SH, Zhu JF (2011) Factors influencing the treatment of severe gluteal muscle contracture in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 20(2):67–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang W, Wang Y, Wang Z (2002) Treatment of gluteal muscle contracture by arthroscopic soft tissue release. Zhongguo Lin Chuang Kang Fu Za Zhi 6(12):1758–1759

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu J, Geng X, Muhammad H, Wang X, Huang JZ, Zhang C, Ma X (2014) Comparison of the incisions for the open surgical treatment of gluteal muscle contracture. J Pediatr Orthop B 23(5):435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Tang X, Jiang X, Wang D, Peng M, Liu L (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of unilateral gluteal muscle contracture. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 25(5):530–532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang X, Ma Y, You T, Tian X, Zhang H, Zhu Q, Zhang W (2015) Roles of TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway in pathogenesis and development of gluteal muscle contracture. Connect Tissue Res 56(1):9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu D, Yang S, Xiao B, Wang H, Meng C (2011) Comparison of endoscopic surgery and open surgery for gluteal muscle contracture. J Pediatr Orthop 31(5):e38–e43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez de Valderrama JA, Esteve de Miguel R (1981) Fibrosis of the gluteus maximus: a cause of limited flexion and adduction of the hip in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 156:67–68

  9. Liu Y-J, Wang Y, Xue J (2009) Arthroscopic gluteal muscle contracture release with radiofrequency energy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):799–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. You T, Zhang XT, Zha ZG, Zhang WT (2015) Congenital heart disease in adolescents with gluteal muscle contracture. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(5):e488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao CG, He XJ, Lu B (2009) Classification of gluteal muscle contracture in children and outcome of different treatments. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck M, Sledge JB, Gautier E, Dora CF, Ganz R (2000) The anatomy and function of the gluteus minimus muscle. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 82(3):358–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All of the named authors take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole and have given final approval for this version to be published. We thank Huaigu Tian for his statistical and technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wentao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was supported by Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Funding NO: A2015560 and A2016517).

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Xintao Zhang and Xiaocheng Jiang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Jiang, X., He, F. et al. Arthroscopic revision release of gluteal muscle contracture after failed primary open surgery. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1521–1526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3354-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3354-5

Keywords

Navigation