Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of navigation in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy can improve tibial slope maintenance and reduce radiation exposure

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

We sought to determine the usefulness and the disadvantages of the navigation in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) compared to the conventional technique, in terms of target coronal alignment achievement, tibial slope maintenance, radiation exposure and operative time.

Methods

We retrospectively compared 40 knees treated with navigated MOWHTO by one surgeon with 20 knees treated with conventional MOWHTO by another surgeon. Screw length of the plate was predetermined using validated simple algorithms only in the navigation group to facilitate the operation. The acceptable range of the postoperative coronal alignment was defined as 2°–6° of the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA) and 55 %–70 % of the weight loading line coordinate (WLL). The proportion of the coronal alignment outlier, posterior tibial slope change, fluoroscopy time and operative time were compared.

Results

The coronal alignment outliers were fewer in the navigation group, but the differences were not significant (mTFA outlier 18 % vs. 30 %, p = 0.326; WLL outlier 20 % vs. 30 %, p = 0.519). Tibial slope was maintained in the navigation group (+0.3°, p = 0.732), whereas increased in the conventional group (+3°, p < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time was shorter in the navigation group (10.4 seconds vs. 24.8 seconds, p < 0.001). The operative time was comparable in both groups (41.3 minutes vs. 39.2 minutes, p = 0.232).

Conclusions

The use of navigation can improve tibial slope maintenance and reduce radiation exposure in MOWHTO, without considerable extension of operative time by optimising the surgical technique.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amendola A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34:155–160

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Azab HM, Morgenstern M, Ahrens P, Schuster T, Imhoff AB, Lorenz SG (2011) Limb alignment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and its effect on the clinical outcome. Orthopedics 34:e622–e628

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D (1992) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res:248–264

  4. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:332–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coventry MB (1973) Osteotomy about the knee for degenerative and rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:23–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaasbeek RD, Nicolaas L, Rijnberg WJ, van Loon CJ, van Kampen A (2010) Correction accuracy and collateral laxity in open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. A one-year randomised controlled study. Int Orthop 34:201–207

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Seo HY (2008) Navigated open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Sports Med Arthrosc 16:84–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang G, Zheng G, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Staubli A, Mueller U, Schmucki D, Fluetsch S, Nolte LP (2005) Implementation, accuracy evaluation, and preliminary clinical trial of a CT-free navigation system for high tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 10:73–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keppler P, Gebhard F, Grutzner PA, Wang G, Zheng G, Hufner T, Hankemeier S, Nolte LP (2004) Computer aided high tibial open wedge osteotomy. Injury 35(Suppl 1):S-A68–S-A78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akamatsu Y, Mitsugi N, Mochida Y, Taki N, Kobayashi H, Takeuchi R, Saito T (2012) Navigated opening wedge high tibial osteotomy improves intraoperative correction angle compared with conventional method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:586–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH (2009) Closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy using computer-assisted surgery compared to the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91:1164–1171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Iorio R, Pagnottelli M, Vadala A, Giannetti S, Di Sette P, Papandrea P, Conteduca F, Ferretti A (2013) Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: comparison between manual and computer-assisted techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SJ, Koh YG, Chun YM, Kim YC, Park YS, Sung CH (2009) Medial opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system versus a conventional method: a 1-year retrospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maurer F, Wassmer G (2006) High tibial osteotomy: does navigation improve results? Orthopedics 29:S130–S132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reising K, Strohm PC, Hauschild O, Schmal H, Khattab M, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2013) Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saragaglia D, Roberts J (2005) Navigated osteotomies around the knee in 170 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to genu varum. Orthopedics 28:s1269–s1274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saragaglia D, Blaysat M, Mercier N, Grimaldi M (2012) Results of forty two computer-assisted double level osteotomies for severe genu varum deformity. Int Orthop 36:999–1003

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ribeiro C, Severino N, de Barros M, Fucs P (2014) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: navigation system compared to the conventional technique in a controlled clinical study. Int Orthop 38:1627–1631

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C (2006) Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:917–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson DW, Warkentine B (2007) Technical aspects of computer-assisted opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 20:134–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim TK, Chang CB, Lee KH, Cho HJ, Je MS, Won HH, Kang YG (2012) Use of simple algorithms to predict screw length facilitates navigation-controlled medial opening-wedge osteotomy using the TomoFix HTO system. Orthopedics 35:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo JH, Chang CB, Shin KS, Seong SC, Kim TK (2008) Anatomical references to assess the posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplasty 23:586–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JA (2005) Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1227–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Azab H, Halawa A, Anetzberger H, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2008) The effect of closed- and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: a retrospective radiological review of 120 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90:1193–1197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20:366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ (2007) How to avoid unintended increase of posterior slope in navigation-assisted open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthopedics 30:S127–S131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ribeiro CH, Severino NR, Fucs PM (2013) Preoperative surgical planning versus navigation system in valgus tibial osteotomy: a cross-sectional study. Int Orthop 37:1483–1486

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent was obtained. This work was performed at the Joint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

Funding

No financial support was provided for this study.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Kim received research funding from Smith & Nephew and B.Braun Aesculap, and is a design consultant for Smith & Nephew and B.Braun Aesculap. None of the other authors (YGN, SHE, SJK, MJC) have relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Kyun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Na, Y.G., Eom, S.H., Kim, S.J. et al. The use of navigation in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy can improve tibial slope maintenance and reduce radiation exposure. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 499–507 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2880-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2880-x

Keywords

Navigation