Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence of serious adverse events caused by tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with oncogenic driver alterations

  • Research
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Sequential tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) increases the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). However, the factors and the types of TKIs that affect the incidence of SAEs remain unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received sequential TKIs following ICIs between November 2015 and April 2021. All AEs were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver 5.0.

Results

Among 1,638 NSCLC patients who received ICIs, 63 patients received sequential TKIs following ICIs. The types of TKIs included EGFR-TKIs in 48 patients, ALK-TKIs in 10 patients, and others in 5 patients. The median dosing interval was 57 days (range: 7–698). Eighteen (28.6%) patients developed SAEs (Grade 3/4 or hospitalized). The incidence of SAEs and withdrawal of TKIs due to AEs were significantly higher in patients (n = 40) who initiated TKI treatment within 3 months after ICIs than in patients (n = 23) who initiated TKI treatment 3 months after ICIs (SAEs, 40.0% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.01; withdrawal rate: 57.5% vs. 21.7%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of SAEs and withdrawal rate due to AEs between EGFR-TKIs and other TKIs (SAE, 22.9% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.20; withdrawal rate: 41.7% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.55).

Conclusion

The dosing interval from last ICI to the initiation of TKI treatment can affects the incidence of SAEs and the withdrawal rate due to AEs regardless of the types of TKIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ABCP:

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel

ALK:

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

Dab/Tra:

Dabrafenib/trametinib

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

ICI:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor

ILD:

Interstitial lung disease

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MET:

C-Met

NE:

Not estimable

NRG1:

Neuregulin 1

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

PD-1:

Programmed cell death 1

PD-L1:

Programmed death-ligand 1

PS:

Performance status

ROS1:

C-ros oncogene 1

SAE:

Serious adverse event

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

References

  1. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0909530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou C, Wu Y-L, Chen G et al (2011) Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 12:735–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70184-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sequist LV, Yang JC-H, Yamamoto N et al (2013) Phase III study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma With EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol 31:3327–3334. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW et al (2014) First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 371:2167–2177. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F et al (2018) Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 378:2288–2301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaira K, Naito T, Takahashi T et al (2010) Pooled analysis of the reports of erlotinib after failure of gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 68:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Asahina H, Oizumi S, Inoue A et al (2010) Phase II study of gefitinib readministration in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and previous response to gefitinib. Oncology 79:423–429. https://doi.org/10.1159/000326488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cappuzzo F, Morabito A, Normanno N et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of rechallenge treatment with gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 99:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oda N, Ichihara E, Hotta K et al (2017) Phase II study of the EGFR-TKI rechallenge With Afatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutation without T790M: Okayama lung cancer study group trial OLCSG 1403. Clin Lung Cancer 18:241–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.07.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamaguchi O, Kaira K, Mouri A et al (2019) Re-challenge of afatinib after 1st generation EGFR-TKI failure in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 83:817–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03790-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D et al (2018) Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med 379:2342–2350. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1809697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn MJ, Yang J, Yu H et al (2016) 136O: Osimertinib combined with durvalumab in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: results from the TATTON phase Ib trial. J Thorac Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1556-0864(16)30246-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gettinger S, Hellmann MD, Chow LQM et al (2018) Nivolumab plus Erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 13:1363–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoenfeld AJ, Arbour KC, Rizvi H et al (2019) Severe immune-related adverse events are common with sequential PD-(L)1 blockade and osimertinib. Ann Oncol 30:839–844. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin JJ, Chin E, Yeap BY et al (2019) Increased hepatotoxicity associated with sequential immune checkpoint inhibitor and crizotinib therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 14:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McCoach CE, Rolfo C, Drilon A et al (2022) hypersensitivity reactions to selpercatinib treatment with or without prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in LIBRETTO-001. J Thorac Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2022.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harding JJ, Pulitzer M, Chapman PB (2012) Vemurafenib sensitivity skin reaction after ipilimumab. N Engl J Med 366:866–868. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1114329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Imafuku K, Yoshino K, Ymaguchi K, Tsuboi S, Ohara K, Hata H (2017) Nivolumab therapy before vemurafenib administration induces a severe skin rash. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31:e169–e171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dimitriou F, Matter AV, Mangana J, Urosevic-Maiwald M, Micaletto S, Braun RP, French LE, Dummer R (2019) Cytokine release syndrome during sequential treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and kinase inhibitors for metastatic melanoma. J Immunother 42:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gemma A, Kusumoto M, Sakai F et al (2020) Real-world evaluation of factors for interstitial lung disease incidence and radiologic characteristics in patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC treated with osimertinib in Japan. J Thorac Oncol 15:1893–1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brahmer JR, Drake CG, Wollner I et al (2010) Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J Clin Oncol 28:3167–3175. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Janne PA, Yang JC, Kim DW et al (2015) AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mamesaya N, Kenmotsu H, Katsumata M, Nakajima T, Endo M, Takahashi T (2017) Osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease after treatment with anti-PD1 antibody. Invest New Drugs 35:105–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-016-0389-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhai X, Zhang J, Tian Y, Li J, Jing W, Guo H, Zhu H (2020) The mechanism and risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Biol Med 17:599–611. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sullivan RJ, Weber JS (2021) Immune-related toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors: mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00259-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lizotte PH, Hong RL, Luster TA et al (2018) A high-throughput immune-oncology screen identifies EGFR inhibitors as potent enhancers of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte tumor cell killing. Cancer Immunol Res 6:1511–1523. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pollack BP, Sapkota B, Cartee TV (2011) Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition augments the expression of MHC class I and II genes. Clin Cancer Res 17:4400–4413. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frederick DT, Piris A, Cogdill AP et al (2013) BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 19:1225–1231. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YS and TY designed the study. YS collected the clinical data. YS performed statistical data analyses, interpretation of the results, and writing of the manuscript. YS and TY drafted the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuya Yoshida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Yoshida received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; grants from AbbVie, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical; and personal fees from Chugai and Novartis. Dr. Matsumoto received grants from Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, Hitachi High-Technologies, Hitachi, Ltd., and National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and received personal fees from AMCO INC., AstraZeneca, COOK, and Olympus. Dr. Masuda received personal fees from Chugai and AstraZeneca. Dr. Shinno received personal fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Chugai Pharmaceutical and received grants from Japan Clinical Research Operations K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and Ono Pharmaceutical. Dr. Okuma received grants from AbbVie. Dr. Goto received grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi- Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Guardant Health, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; grants from Kyorin; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, and Illumina. Dr. Horinouchi received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Ono Pharmaceutical and received grants from Astellas, Genomic Health, and Merck Serono. Dr. Yamamoto received grants and personal fees from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Takeda Pharmaceutical; grants from Astellas, Bayer, Chiome Bioscience Inc., Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Janssen Pharma, Kyowa-Hakko kirin, MSD, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Quintiles, and Sumitomo Dainippon; and received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Otsuka, Cimic, and Sysmex. Dr. Ohe received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharma, Kyorin, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical; grants from Kissei; and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, and Celtrion. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The present study with human samples has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (2019-123).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 48 KB)

Supplementary file 2 (DOCX 27 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimoda, Y., Yoshida, T., Miyakoshi, J. et al. Incidence of serious adverse events caused by tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with oncogenic driver alterations. Cancer Immunol Immunother 72, 2613–2621 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03429-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03429-z

Keywords

Navigation