Skip to main content
Log in

An integrative clinical and CT-based tumoral/peritumoral radiomics nomogram to predict the microsatellite instability in rectal carcinoma

  • Hollow Organ GI
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is detected in approximately 15% of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients, which has emerged as a predictor of patient response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Rectal carcinoma (RC) is the most common type of CRC. Therefore, prediction of MSI status of RC is significant for personalized medication. The purpose of this article was to develop an integrative model that combines clinical characteristics and computed tomography-based (CT-based) tumoral/peritumoral radiomics to predict the MSI status in RC.

Methods

A cohort of 788 RCs with 97 high-MSI status (MSI-H) and 691 microsatellite stable status (MSS) were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2021 in this retrospective study. Clinical characteristics were recorded, and CT-based tumoral/peritumoral radiomic features were calculated after segmenting volume of interests. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 proportion. Logistic models of single tumoral radiomics (LM-tRadio), peritumoral radiomics (LM-ptRadio), and combined tumoral/peritumoral radiomics (LM-Radio) were constructed to distinguish MSI-H from MSS, and a relevant radiomic score was calculated. An integrative nomogram (LM-Nomo) was developed, including significant clinical characteristics and CT-based tumoral/peritumoral radiomics. The area under receiver operator curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the efficacy of prediction.

Results

The AUCs of LM-Radio were 0.785 (95%CI 0.732–0.837) in the training set and were 0.628 (95%CI 0.528–0.723) in the validation set, which were higher than those of LM-tRadio and LM-ptRadio. The AUCs of single LM-ptRadio were slightly higher than those of LM-tRadio (0.724 vs. 0.708 in the training set, 0.613 vs. 0.602 in the validation set). The LM-Nomo containing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), hypertension, and CT-based tumoral/peritumoral radiomic score showed the highest AUCs of 0.796 (95%CI 0.748–0.843) in the training set and 0.679 (95%CI 0.588–0.771) in the validation set in predicting the MSI-H status of RC.

Conclusion

The AUCs of LM-ptRadio were slightly higher than LM-tRadio to evaluate the MSI-H status of RC. The LM-Nomo, which includes significant clinical characteristics and CT-based tumoral/peritumoral radiomics score, demonstrated the best performance in predicting MSI-H status of RC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):145-164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagante F, Ruzzenente A, Sasaki K, et al. Morphologic and biologic characteristics of disease are associated with prognosis of patients with colo-rectal liver metastasis undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Hpb. 2018;20:189-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang YZ, Alabousi A. Incidental findings on staging CT for rectal cancer: Frequency, clinical significance and outcomes. Clin Imaging. 2023;93:14-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Q, Xu J, Wang A, et al. Systematic review of machine learning-based radiomics approach for predicting microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer. La Radiologia medica. 2023;128(2):136-148.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Trojan J, Stintzing S, Haase O, et al. Complete pathological response after neoadjuvant short-course immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer. Oncologist. 2021.

  7. Boland CR, Goel A. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(6):2073-2087.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan S, Li X, Cui X, et al. Computed Tomography-Based Radiomic Features Could Potentially Predict Microsatellite Instability Status in Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Preliminary Study. Acad Radiol. 2019;26(12):1633-1640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kloor M, Staffa L, Ahadova A, von Knebel Doeberitz M. Clinical significance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2014;399(1):23-31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, et al. Introduction to Radiomics. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(4):488-495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pei Q, Yi X, Chen C, et al. Pre-treatment CT-based radiomics nomogram for predicting microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):714-724.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang W, Yin H, Huang Z, et al. Development and validation of MRI-based deep learning models for prediction of microsatellite instability in rectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2021;10(12):4164-4173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Z, Dai H, Liu Y, Pan F, Zhang M. Radiomics Analysis of Multi-Sequence MR Images For Predicting Microsatellite Instability Status Preoperatively in Rectal Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021;7(11):697497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang W, Huang Z, Zhao J, He D, Song B. Development and validation of magnetic resonance imaging- based radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability in rectal cancer. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2021;9(2):134-146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang Z, Zhang W, He D, et al. Development and validation of a radiomics model based on T2WI images for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in rectal cancer: Study Protocol Clinical Trial (SPIRIT Compliant). Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(10):e19428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Z, Zhang J, Zhong Q, et al. Development and external validation of a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in rectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(3):1835-1843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Liu J, Wu C, Peng J, Wei Y, Cui S. Preoperative Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Rectal Cancer Using Five Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Multiparametric MRI Radiomics. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;13(2):269.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Paku M, Uemura M, Kitakaze M, et al. Clinical Significance of Preoperative and Postoperative Serum CEA and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Levels in Patients Undergoing Curative Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66(3):392-400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan H, Xu X, Tu S, Chen B, Wei Y, Ma Y. The CT-based intratumoral and peritumoral machine learning radiomics analysis in predicting lymph node metastasis in rectal carcinoma. BMC gastroenterology. 2022;22(1):463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, et al. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(4):261-268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Büsing KA, Kilian Ak Fau - Schaible T, Schaible T Fau - Debus A, Debus A Fau - Weiss C, Weiss C Fau - Neff KW, Neff KW. Reliability and validity of MR image lung volume measurement in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and in vitro lung models. Radiology. 2008;246(2):553-561.

  22. Koivu A, Sairanen M, Airola A, Pahikkala T. Synthetic minority oversampling of vital statistics data with generative adversarial networks. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(11):1667-1674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Meng WJ, Sun XF, Tian C, et al. Microsatellite instability did not predict individual survival in sporadic stage II and III rectal cancer patients. Oncology. 2007;72(1-2):82-88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kawakami H, Zaanan A, Sinicrope FA. Microsatellite instability testing and its role in the management of colorectal cancer. Current treatment options in oncology. 2015;16(7):30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. de la Chapelle A, Hampel H. Clinical relevance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3380-3387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ying M, Pan J, Lu G, et al. Development and validation of a radiomics-based nomogram for the preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. BMC cancer. 2022;22(1):524.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Z, Dai H, Liu Y, Pan F, Yang Y, Zhang M. Radiomics Analysis of Multi-Sequence MR Images For Predicting Microsatellite Instability Status Preoperatively in Rectal Cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:697497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Acar T, Acar N, Kamer E, et al. Do tumor localization, microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency have an impact on the prognosis of colorectal cancer? Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2021;24(12):1814-1823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cao Y, Zhang G, Zhang J, et al. Predicting Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer Based on Triphasic Enhanced Computed Tomography Radiomics Signatures: A Multicenter Study. Front Oncol. 2021;10(11):687771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li M, Jin Y, Rui J, et al. Computed tomography-based radiomics for predicting lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2022;146:110065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Medical and Health Research Projects of Health Commission of Zhejiang Province (Nos. 2022KY040, 2023KY472).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hang Yuan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Xu, X., Lin, Y. et al. An integrative clinical and CT-based tumoral/peritumoral radiomics nomogram to predict the microsatellite instability in rectal carcinoma. Abdom Radiol 49, 783–790 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04099-2

Keywords

Navigation