Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of cinematic rendering of gastric masses into clinical practice: a pictorial review

  • Review
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-resolution CT is the gold standard diagnostic imaging study for staging of gastric malignancies. Cinematic rendering creates a photorealistic evaluation using the standard high-resolution CT volumetric data set. This novel display method offers unique possibilities for the evaluation of gastric masses. Here we present further observations of the role of cinematic rendering in the evaluation of gastric masses at a large tertiary care center. We offer three valuable teaching points for the application of the cinematic rendering for gastric masses with several case examples for each teaching point, discuss potential limitations of cinematic rendering, and review future directions for cinematic rendering in this setting.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Gastric Cancer Version 2.2022. 2022.

  2. Brown AE, Nakakura EK. Optimal Staging for Gastric Cancer Starts With High-Resolution Computed Tomography. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:e215330. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eid M, De Cecco CN, Nance JW, Jr., Caruso D, Albrecht MH, Spandorfer AJ, et al. Cinematic Rendering in CT: A Novel, Lifelike 3D Visualization Technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(2):370-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.17850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Allaf ME, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Photorealistic 3-Dimensional Cinematic Rendering of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Volumetric Computed Tomography Data. Urology. 2018;115:e3-e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jin YR, Yang XL, Li QQ, Yan ZL, Yang HY, Liao C. CT of ovarian cancer: 3D cinematic rendering for preoperative evaluation. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0461-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu LC, Rowe SP, Fishman EK. Cinematic rendering of focal liver masses. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100(9):467-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.04.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rowe SP, Chu LC, Fishman EK. Evaluation of Stomach Neoplasms With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Focus on the Potential Role of Cinematic Rendering. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42(5):661-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmood F, Chen R, Sudarsky S, Yu D, Durr NJ. Deep learning with cinematic rendering: fine-tuning deep neural networks using photorealistic medical images. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(18):185012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aada93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elshafei M, Binder J, Baecker J, Brunner M, Uder M, Weber GF, et al. Comparison of Cinematic Rendering and Computed Tomography for Speed and Comprehension of Surgical Anatomy. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(8):738-44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. Radiographics. 2003;23(1):75-87. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.231025071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hargunani R, Maclachlan J, Kaniyur S, Power N, Pereira SP, Malhotra A. Cross-sectional imaging of gastric neoplasia. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(4):420-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2008.09.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun S, Wang M, Sun S. Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided injection in endoscopic resection of solid submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 2002;34(1):82-5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-19386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rowe SP, Chu LC, Fishman EK. Cinematic Rendering With Positive Oral Contrast: Virtual Fluoroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43(5):718-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Recht HS, Fishman EK. Cinematic Rendering of a Perforated Benign Gastric Ulcer. Radiology. 2021;300(2):286. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021204653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowe SP, Chu LC, Fishman EK. Computed Tomography Cinematic Rendering in the Evaluation of Colonic Pathology: Technique and Clinical Applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43(3):475-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Brookmeyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

E.K. Fishman: GE Medical educational grant support (Hopkins), Siemens Healthineers research grant support (Hopkins), HipGraphics Inc-co-founder and shareholder. C. Brookmeyer, S.P. Rowe, L.C. Chu declares that they have no disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brookmeyer, C., Rowe, S.P., Chu, L.C. et al. Implementation of cinematic rendering of gastric masses into clinical practice: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol 47, 3386–3393 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03604-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03604-3

Keywords

Navigation