Skip to main content
Log in

Hemodialysis catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium for computed tomography angiography

  • Technical
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

CT angiography (CTA) requires vascular access with flow rates of 5–7 mL/s. Hemodialysis (HD) is performed at 6–10 mL/s. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the structural integrity of HD catheters in the administration of contrast media via a mechanical power injector under varying conditions.

Methods

Four HD catheters were evaluated in an in vitro study. Tested were contrast media type (iopamidol 300 and 370 mgI/mL), temperature (25 and 37 °C), catheter diameter (14 Fr to 16 Fr all with double-lumen capacity), catheter length (19–32 cm), and simultaneous double-lumen or single-lumen injection within each of the catheters. Peak plateau pressures (psi) were recorded with flow rates from 5 to 20 mL/s in 5 mL/s increments. In total, 864 unique injections were performed.

Results

No catheter failure (bulging/rupture) was observed in 864 injections. Maximum pressure for single-lumen injection was 51.7 psi (double-lumen: 26.3 psi). Peak pressures were significantly lower in simultaneous double-lumen vs. single-lumen injections (p < 0.001) and low vs. high viscosity contrast media (p < 0.001). Neither larger vs. smaller diameter lumens (p = 0.221) nor single-lumen injection in arterial vs. venous (p = 0.834) were significantly different.

Conclusion

HD catheters can be used to safely administer iodinated contrast media via mechanical power injection in in vitro operating conditions. Maximum peak pressure is below the manufacturer’s 30 psi limit at flow rates up to 20 mL/s in double-lumen injections and up to 10 mL/s in single-lumen injections, which is higher than the usual maximum of 8 mL/s for CT angiography in clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data were available to all authors in full.

References

  1. USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. (2019) https://www.usrds.org/reference.aspx. Accessed 05/12/2020

  2. Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, Shenoy S, Yevzlin AS, Abreo K, Allon M, Asif A, Astor BC, Glickman MH, Graham J, Moist LM, Rajan DK, Roberts C, Vachharajani TJ, Valentini RP (2020) KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 75 (4):S1-S164. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001

  3. Parienti J-J, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, Mira J-P, Kalfon P, Gros A, Marqué S, Thuong M, Pottier V, Ramakers M, Savary B, Seguin A, Valette X, Terzi N, Sauneuf B, Cattoir V, Mermel LA, du Cheyron D (2015) Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. New England Journal of Medicine 373 (13):1220-1229. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1500964

  4. Agarwal AK (2013) Central Vein Stenosis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 61 (6):1001-1015. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.10.024

  5. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing G-J, Harjola V-P, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Jennings CS, Jiménez D, Kucher N, Lang IM, Lankeit M, Lorusso R, Mazzolai L, Meneveau N, Ní Áinle F, Prandoni P, Pruszczyk P, Righini M, Torbicki A, Van Belle E, Zamorano JL, Group ESD (2019) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal 41 (4):543-603. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405

  6. Moss AJ, Williams MC, Newby DE, Nicol ED (2017) The Updated NICE Guidelines: Cardiac CT as the First-Line Test for Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 10 (5):15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-017-9412-6

  7. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL (2019) Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 50 (12):e344-e418. doi:doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211

  8. Kooman JP, Wijnen JA, Draaijer P, van Bortel LM, Gladziwa U, Peltenburg HG, Struyker-Boudier HA, van Hooff JP, Leunissen KM (1992) Compliance and reactivity of the peripheral venous system in chronic intermittent hemodialysis. Kidney Int 41 (4):1041-1048. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1992.158

  9. Murea M, Geary RL, Davis RP, Moossavi S (2019) Vascular access for hemodialysis: A perpetual challenge. Semin Dial 32 (6):527-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12828

  10. Coyle D, Bloomgarden D, Beres R, Patel S, Sane S, Hurst E (2004) Power injection of contrast media via peripherally inserted central catheters for CT. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 15 (8):809-814. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rvi.0000128812.20864.ec

  11. Macha DB, Nelson RC, Howle LE, Hollingsworth JW, Schindera ST (2009) Central venous catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium. Radiology 253 (3):870-878. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2533081086

  12. Rigsby CK, Gasber E, Seshadri R, Sullivan C, Wyers M, Ben-Ami T (2007) Safety and efficacy of pressure-limited power injection of iodinated contrast medium through central lines in children. AJR American journal of roentgenology 188 (3):726-732. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.06.0104

  13. Williamson EE, McKinney JM (201) Assessing the adequacy of peripherally inserted central catheters for power injection of intravenous contrast agents for CT. Journal of computer assisted tomography 25 (6):932-937

  14. Hollander S, Mojibian H, Emery M, Tal MG (2012) Power injection of iodinated intravenous contrast material through acute and chronic hemodialysis catheters. The journal of vascular access 13 (1):61-64. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.2011.8442

  15. Pritchard PJ, Mitchell JW (2011) Fox and McDonnald’s Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. 9 edn. Wiley,

  16. Contractor D (1965) The reflection of waterhammer pressure waves from minor losses.

  17. Bussi S, Coppo A, Botteron C, Fraimbault V, Fanizzi A, Laurentiis E, Colombo Serra S, Kirchin M, Tedoldi F, Maisano F (2017) Differences in gadolinium retention after repeated injections of macrocyclic MR contrast agents to rats: Differences in Gd Retention Between cGBCAs. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25822

  18. Buijs SB, Barentsz MW, Smits MLJ, Gratama JWC, Spronk PE (2017) Systematic review of the safety and efficacy of contrast injection via venous catheters for contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Eur J Radiol Open 4:118-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2017.09.002

  19. Bonciarelli G, Batacchi S, Biffi R, Buononato M, Damascelli B, Ghibaudo F, Orsi F, Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G, Verzè A, Borasi G, De Cicco M, Dosio R, Gazzo P, Maso R, Roman A, Ticha V, Venier G, Blackburn P, Goossens GA, Bowen Santolucito J, Stas M, Van Boxtel T, Vesely TM, de Lutio E (2011) GAVeCeLT* consensus statement on the correct use of totally implantable venous access devices for diagnostic radiology procedures. J Vasc Access 12 (4):292-305. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.2011.7736

Download references

Acknowledgements

The catheters were donated to our department by the vendors, but the vendors had no access to or control over the experiments or the data.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Departments of Radiology and Engineering at Duke University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fides R. Schwartz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwartz, F.R., Lewis, D.S., King, A.E. et al. Hemodialysis catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium for computed tomography angiography. Abdom Radiol 46, 2961–2967 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02905-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02905-9

Keywords

Navigation