Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hepatic perfusional changes on CT and MRI: a radiology primer

  • Review
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hepatic perfusional changes are common in response to, or as a result of, a multitude of pathological processes. These can be neoplastic, inflammatory, fibrotic, or ischemic in origin, to name a few. The liver, having a dual blood supply, is a unique organ to study using contrast-enhanced CT and MRI imaging due to its varied appearance on multiphasic imaging. Knowledge of the CT and MRI appearance of hepatic perfusional changes, in addition to the clinical presentation, can often result in an accurate differential diagnosis. Many of the conditions that cause these changes in hepatic blood flow result in similar appearances on imaging. As a result, it is important that radiologists be aware of common pitfalls when dealing with hepatic perfusional changes to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. As such, this review will focus on some of the various causes of hepatic perfusional changes and how to accurately identify and diagnose them based on their CT and MRI appearance.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lupescu IG, Grasu M, Capşa R, Pitrop A, Georgescu SA. Hepatic perfusion disorders: Computer-tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2006;15:273–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Torabi M, Hosseinzadeh K, Federle MP. CT of nonneoplastic epatic vascular and perfusion disorders. Radiographics 2008;28:1967–82. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.287085067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li YL, Lee KH, Cheng AKC, Yu ML. Nutmeg liver. Abdom Radiol 2018;43:1275–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1283-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wells ML, Fenstad ER, Poterucha JT, Hough DM, Young PM, Araoz PA, et al. Imaging findings of congestive hepatopathy. Radiographics 2016;36:1024–37. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Das CJ, Soneja M, Tayal S, Chahal A, Srivastava S, Kumar A, et al. Role of radiological imaging and interventions in management of Budd–Chiari syndrome. Clin Radiol 2018;73:610–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang S, Wu J, Lei S. CT Features of Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease: A Meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 2018;25:328–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Qi X, Han G, He C, Yin Z, Guo W, Niu J, et al. CT features of non-malignant portal vein thrombosis: A pictorial review. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2012;36:561–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2012.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adler DD, Glazer GM, Silver TM. Computed tomography of liver infarction. Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:315–8. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.142.2.315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickson AM. The focal hepatic hot spot sign. Radiology 2005;237:647–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372031690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa AF, Clarke SE, Stueck AE, McInnes MDF, Thipphavong S. Benign Neoplasms, Mass-Like Infections, and Pseudotumors That Mimic Hepatic Malignancy at MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Welle CL, Welch BT, Brinjikji W, Ehman EC, Venkatesh SK, Johnson MP, et al. Abdominal manifestations of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a series of 333 patients over 15 years. Abdom Radiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01976-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Byun JH, Kim TK, Lee CW, Lee JK, Kim AY, Kim PN, et al. Arterioportal shunt: Prevalence in small hemangiomas versus that in hepatocellular carcinomas 3 cm or smaller at two-phase helical CT. Radiology 2004;232:354–60. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2322030966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathew RP, Sam M, Raubenheimer M, Patel V, Low G. Hepatic hemangiomas: the various imaging avatars and its mimickers. Radiol Medica 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01185-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi JY, Lee JM, Sirlin CB. CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: Part I. Development, growth, and spread: Key pathologic and imaging aspects. Radiology 2014;272:635–54. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132361.

  15. Sica GT, Ji H, Ros PR. CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:691–8. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma A, Houshyar R, Bhosale P, Choi J Il, Gulati R, Lall C. Chemotherapy induced liver abnormalities: an imaging perspective. Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20:317–26. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.3.317.

  17. Kim SW, Shin HC, Kim IY. Transient arterial enhancement of the hepatic parenchyma in patients with acute cholangitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:398–404. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0b013e318186faa1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsumoto K, Inoue F, Amano S, Tamura Y, Ashiarai M. Fitz-Hugh-Curtis Syndrome Preceded by Constipation in a 14-Year-Old Girl. Gynecol Obs Case Rep 2018;4:57. https://doi.org/10.21767/2471-8165.1000057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Boer JP, Verpalen IM, Gabriëls RY, de Haan H, Meijssen M, Bloembergen P, et al. Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome resulting in nutmeg liver on computed tomography. Radiol Case Reports 2019;14:930–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2019.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Lu H, Ji H, Li Y. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: A case report and literature review. Intractable Rare Dis Res 2015;4:155–8. https://doi.org/10.5582/irdr.2015.01021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurowecki D, Patlas MN, Haider EA, Alabousi A. Cross-sectional pictorial review of IgG4-related disease. Br J Radiol 2019;92. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190448.

  22. Faria SC, Ganesan K, Mwangi I, Shiehmorteza M, Viamonte B, Mazhar S, et al. MR imaging of liver fibrosis: Current state of the art. Radiographics 2009;29:1615–35. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.296095512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandarana H, Fowler UC San Diego Alice Fung KJ, Ganeshan Sir Reliance Foundation Rajan Gupta KH, Harris Vancouver Imaging Thomas Hope San Francisco Jeanne Horowitz AU, Hussain H, Sahani Massachusetts General Hospital Claude Sirlin UC San Diego Vahid Yaghmai DB. LI-RADS ® v2018 CT/MRI Core LI-RADS ® Technique. n.d.

Download references

Funding

This paper received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Alabousi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CME activity This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit https://ce.mayo.edu/node/103495 and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunter, D., Riaz, S., Haider, E.A. et al. Hepatic perfusional changes on CT and MRI: a radiology primer. Abdom Radiol 46, 179–196 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02787-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02787-x

Keywords

Navigation