Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-automatic evaluation of baseline whole-body tumor burden as an imaging biomarker of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer

  • Pelvis
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The prognostic value of baseline tumor burden of prostate cancer was rarely studied. We aimed to evaluate the whole-body tumor burden of 68Ga- prostate specific membrane antigen-HBED-CC (68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer semi-automatically, and explore its preliminary application in predicting prognosis.

Methods

Similar to metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT tumor burden parameters including whole-body PSMA tumor volume (wbPSMA-TV) and whole-body total lesions PSMA uptake (wbTL-PSMA) were acquired semi-automatically. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was analyzed. The relationship between tumor burden and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value or Gleason score was investigated. The preliminary application of tumor burden in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) was explored.

Results

Fifty-nine newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. Semi-automatic quantification of whole-body tumor burden had excellent intra-observer and inter-observer consistency [all intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.990]. wbPSMA-TV and wbTL-PSMA were 32.6 (range 1.0–3968.2) cm3 and 161.9 (range 6.0–24971.7), respectively. wbPSMA-TV and wbTL-PSMA correlated with PSA (r = 0.858, p < 0.001; r = 0.879, p < 0.001) and Gleason score (r = 0.793, p < 0.001; r = 0.805, p < 0.001) significantly. In univariate analysis, wbPSMA-TV, wbTL-PSMA, SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, PSMA-TV, TL-PSMA of primary tumor, fPSA and Gleason score were independent significant predictors of PFS (all p < 0.05). Moreover, in multivariate analysis, wbTL-PSMA [hazard ratio (HR): 1.001, p = 0.014] and Gleason score (HR: 5.124, p = 0.031) can significantly predict progression-free prognosis.

Conclusions

As imaging biomarkers, wbPSMA-TV and wbTL-PSMA correlated with clinical characteristics significantly. High wbTL-PSMA or Gleason score was associated with shorter PFS of newly diagnosed prostate cancer independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:7-34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberto Iacovelli, Emilie Lanoy, Laurence Albiges et al (2012) Tumour burden is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 110:1747-1753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hua-Xiang Xu, Tao Chen, Wen-Quan Wang et al (2014) Metabolic tumour burden assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT associated with serum CA19-9 predicts pancreatic cancer outcome after resection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:1093-1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eder M, Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U et al (2012) 68 Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem 23:688-697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosh A, Heston WD (2004) Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen(PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem 91:528-539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross JS, Sheehan CE, Fisher HA el al (2003) Correlation of primary tumor prostate specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9:6357-6362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C et al (2017) 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:941- 949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shagera QA, Cheon GJ, Koh Y et al (2019) Prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume on baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT in addition to NCCN-IPI in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: further stratification of the group with a high-risk NCCN-IPI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:1417-1427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salavati A, Duan F, Snyder BS et al (2017) Optimal FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters for risk stratification in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:1969-1983

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Groheux D, Martineau A, Teixeira L et al (2017) 18FDG-PET/CT for predicting the outcome in ER +/HER2- breast cancer patients: comparison of clinicopathological parameters and PET image-derived indices including tumor texture analysis. Breast Cancer Res 19:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen HH, Chiu NT, Su WC et al (2012) Prognostic value of whole-body total lesion glycolysis at pretreatment FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiology 264:559-566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim CY, Hong CM, Kim DH et al (2013) Prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:1321-1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zer A, Domachevsky L, Rapson Y et al (2016) The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT on Staging and Prognosis in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer. Eur Radiol 26:3155-3161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gafita A, Bieth M, Krönke M et al (2019) qPSMA: Semiautomatic software for whole-body tumor burden assessment in prostate cancer using 68 Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT. J Nucl Med 60:1277-1283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmuck S, von Klot CA, Henkenberens C et al (2017) Initial experience with volumetric 68 Ga PSMA I&T PET/CT for assessment of whole-body tumor burden as a quantitative imaging biomarker in patients with prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 58:1962-1968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidkonz C, Cordes M, Schmidt D et al (2018) 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived metabolic parameters for determination of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:1862-1872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brito AET, Mourato FA, de Oliveira RPM et al (2019) Evaluation of whole-body tumor burden with 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Ann Nucl Med 33:344–350

  18. EderM, Neels O, Müller M et al (2014) Novel preclinical and radiopharmaceutical aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: a new PET tracer for imaging of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 7:779–796

  19. Hirata K, Kobayashi K, Wong KP et al (2014) A semi-automated technique determining the liver standardized uptake value reference for tumor delineation in FDG PET-CT. PLoS One 9:e105682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobayashi K, Hirata K, Yamaguchi S et al (2015) Prognostic value of volume-based measurements on (11)C- methionine PET in glioma patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:1071-1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurtz DM, Green MR, Bratman SV et al (2015) Noninvasive monitoring of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunoglobulin high-throughput sequencing. Blood 125:3679-3687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bieth M, Kronke M, Tauber R et al (2017) Exploring new multimodal quantitative imaging indices for the assessment of osseous tumor burden in prostate cancer using 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. J Nucl Med 58:1632-1637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ulmert D, Kaboteh R, Fox JJ et al (2012) A novel automated platform for quantifying the extent of skeletal tumour involvement in prostate cancer patients using the Bone Scan Index. Eur Urol 62:78-84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Etchebehere EC, Araujo JC, Fox PS et al (2015) Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Skeletal Tumor Burden on Baseline 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in Predicting Overall Survival. J Nucl Med 56:1177-1184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matthias Eiber, Ken Herrmann, Jeremie Calais et al (2018) Prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA‐ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med 59:469-478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hammes J, Tager P, Drzezga A et al (2018) EBONI: A tool for automated quantification of bone metastasis load in PSMA PET/CT. J Nucl Med 59:1070-1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M et al (2017) 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol imaging 44:1014-1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871417, Ju Jiao); the Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project (201802020033, Yong Zhang); and the Guangdong Medical Research Foundation (A2018047, Qiong Zou).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, Q., Jiao, J., Zou, Mh. et al. Semi-automatic evaluation of baseline whole-body tumor burden as an imaging biomarker of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol 45, 4202–4213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02745-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02745-7

Keywords

Navigation