Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of biliary anatomy in the caudate lobe using drip infusion cholangiography-computed tomography

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the caudate branches (CBs), which are bile ducts originating from the caudate lobe (CL), using drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography (DIC-CT).

Methods

The confluence patterns of CBs were evaluated in 185 adult patients undergoing DIC-CT. The following bile duct features were evaluated: (a) number of depicted CBs; (b) identification of the caudate portion from which the CBs were derived; (c) identification of the confluence site of a CB; and (d) whether there was a difference in the confluence site of the CBs depending on the position of the right posterior hepatic duct (RPHD) and the portal vein (PV).

Results

DIC-CT enabled detection of a total of 640 bile ducts from the CL in 185 patients, and the total number of CBs from the Spiegel lobe (SP), the paracaval portion, and the caudate process (CP) were 347 (54.2%), 112 (17.5%), and 181 (28.2%), respectively. In the SP, over 60% of CBs joined the left hepatic duct system (LHDS). The positional relationship between the RPHD and the PV was divided into a supra-portal course (n = 168) and an infra-portal course (n = 17). The number of CBs joining the LHDS was significantly different between a supra-portal course and an infra-portal course (p = 0.0484).

Conclusion

CBs were depicted by DIC-CT in 98.9% of the subjects, and a detailed evaluation was possible. The number of CBs joining the LHDS was associated with the position of the RPHD and the PV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto T, Kubo S, Shuto T, Ichikawa T, Ogawa M, Hai S, Sakabe K, Tanaka S, Uenishi T, Ikebe T, Tanaka H, Kaneda K, Hirohashi K (2004) Surgical strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma originating in the caudate lobe. Surgery 135:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2003.10.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaib E, Ribeiro MAF Jr., Silva Fde S, Saad WA, Cecconello I (2007) Surgical approach for hepatic caudate lobectomy: Review of 401 cases. J Am Coll Surg 204:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wen ZQ, Yan YQ, Yang JM, Wu MC (2008) Precautions in caudate lobe resection: report of 11 cases. World J Gastroenterol 14:2767–2770

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin Y, Wang L, Yu YQ, Zhou DE, Liu DR, Yang JJ, Peng SY, Li JT (2017) Anatomic isolated caudate lobectomy: Is it possible to establish a standard surgical flow? World J Gastroenterol 23:7433–7439. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7433

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyodo T, Kumano S, Kushihata F, Okada M, Hirata M, Tsuda T, Takada Y, Mochizuki T, Murakami T (2012) CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree. Br J Radiol 85:887–896. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/21209407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitami M, Takase K, Murakami G, Ko S, Tsuboi M, Saito H, Higano S, Nakajima Y, Takahashi S (2006) Types and frequencies of biliary tract variations associated with a major portal venous anomaly: analysis with multi-detector row CT cholangiography. Radiology 238:156–166. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381041783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumon M (2017) Anatomical study of the caudate lobe with special reference to portal venous and biliary branches using corrosion liver casts and clinical application. Liver Cancer 6:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1159/000454682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takamatsu S, Goseki N, Nakajima K, Teramoto K, Iwai T, Arii S (2004) Distributing pattern of the bile duct of the caudate lobe on computed tomography with drip infusion cholangiography and its surgical significance. Hepatogastroenterology 51:29–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitami M, Murakami G, Ko S, Takase K, Tuboi M, Saito H, Nakajima Y, Takahashi S (2004) Spiegel’s lobe bile ducts often drain into the right hepatic duct or its branches: study using drip-infusion cholangiography-computed tomography in 179 consecutive patients. World J Surg 28:1001–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7483-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumon M (1985) [Anatomy of the caudate lobe with special reference to portal vein and bile duct]. Acta Hepatol Jpn 26:1193–1199 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeh BM, Breiman RS, Taouli B, Qayyum A, Roberts JP, Coakley FV (2004) Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography–initial experience. Radiology 230:645–651. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303021775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen JS, Yeh BM, Wang ZJ, Roberts JP, Breiman RS, Qayyum A, Coakley FV (2005) Concordance of second-order portal venous and biliary tract anatomies on MDCT angiography and MDCT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:70–74. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogawa M, Ozawa Y, Ohta K, Sekiguchi T, Omata S, Urano M, Matsuo Y, Shibamoto Y (2017) Usefulness of 3D balanced turbo-field-echo MR sequence evaluating the branching pattern of the intrahepatic bile ducts: comparison with drip infusion CT cholangiography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:1888–1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1093-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saad WE, Ginat D (2008) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiography. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 11:74–89. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2008.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirao K, Miyazaki A, Fujimoto T, Isomoto I, Hayashi K (2000) Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:713–720. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishii H, Noguchi A, Fukami T, Sugimoto R, Tada H, Takeshita H, Umehara S, Izumi H, Tani N, Yamaguchi M, Yamane T (2017) Preoperative evaluation of accessory hepatic ducts by drip infusion cholangiography with CT. BMC Surg 17:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0251-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsson U (1987) Adverse reactions to iotroxate at intravenous cholangiography. A prospective clinical investigation and review of the literature. Acta Radiol 28:571–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Persson A, Dahlstrom N, Smedby O, Brismar TB (2006) Three-dimensional drip infusion CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: a retrospective analysis of feasibility and adverse reaction to contrast material. BMC Med Imaging 6:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-6-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fulcher AS (2004) CT cholangiography: advantages and disadvantages compared with MR cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tract following liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 10:1071–1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinohara Y (1995) [Demonstration of caudate lobe bile ducts using 3D-CT cholangiography]. Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 96:88–96 (in Japanese with English summary)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taenzer V, Volkhardt V (1979) Double blind comparison of meglumine iotroxate (Biliscopin), meglumine iodoxamate (Endobil), and meglumine ioglycamate (Biligram). AJR Am J Roentgenol 132:55–58. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.132.1.55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Edo H, Sekiguchi R, Kajiyama A, Iwasaki M, Hasegawa M, Tsunoo M, Nagamoto M, Gomi T (2017) Variations of Biliary Anatomy from the caudate Lobe by CT Cholangiography – How far can we evaluate? ECR2017-EPOS. https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2017/c-0480.

  23. Edo H, Sekiguchi R, Kajiyama A, Murata N, Nagamoto M, Gomi T (2018) Confluence patterns of bile ducts from the caudate lobe and variations in the right and left hepatic ducts: an analysis using multi-detector row computed tomography cholangiography. ECR2018-EPOS. https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2018/c-1765.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromi Edo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edo, H., Sekiguchi, R., Edo, N. et al. Evaluation of biliary anatomy in the caudate lobe using drip infusion cholangiography-computed tomography. Abdom Radiol 44, 886–893 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1825-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1825-4

Keywords

Navigation