Skip to main content
Log in

Catheter probe extraductal ultrasound (EDUS) exploration of the common bile duct is safe in elderly patients with suspicion of choledocholithiasis after distal gastrectomy

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Post-surgical upper gastrointestinal anatomy may hamper a complete bilio-pancreatic evaluation with a standard echoendoscope. The aim of this study was to assess the role of catheter probe extraductal ultrasound (EDUS) for the evaluation of the common bile duct (CBD) in patients who are status post-gastric surgery and who are suspected of having choledocholithiasis.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with a prior history of gastric surgery, who underwent EDUS for a suspicion of CBD obstruction. For each patient, technical success, accuracy, and safety were recorded. In case of a positive finding of CBD stones, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed. In case of other findings or a negative EDUS, computed tomography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was performed as appropriate.

Results

EDUS was technically successful in all the 11 patients with a Billroth II gastrectomy, while it failed in all the 5 patients with Roux-en-Y gastric surgery. EDUS accuracy was 100% (3 true-positive and 8 true-negative cases). CBD stones, confirmed and successfully extracted at ERCP, were found in two patients, while in one patient EDUS showed a CBD stenosis that was treated with a plastic stent during ERCP; computed tomography at follow-up was negative for cancer. EDUS was correctly negative in 8 patients, as confirmed by MRCP.

Conclusions

EDUS may represent an accurate and safe alternative to standard endoscopic ultrasonography and MRCP for the detection of CBD stones in elderly patients who are status post-Billroth II gastric surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fusaroli P, Kypreos D, Alma Petrini CA, Caletti G (2011) Scientific publications in endoscopic ultrasonography: changing trends in the third millennium. J Clin Gastroenterol. 45:400–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fusaroli P, Kypraios D, Mancino MG, et al. (2012) Interobserver agreement in contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 27:1063–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi SY, Kim JH, Yu MH, et al. (2017) Diagnostic performance and imaging features for predicting the malignant potential of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a comparison of EUS, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42(5):1449–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarapinyo P, Lee LS (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatobiliary endoscopy in surgically altered anatomy. Clin Endosc 49:515–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson JA, Hoffman B, Hawes RH, Romagnuolo J (2010) EUS in patients with surgically altered upper GI anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 72:947–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Erden GA, Kendi AT, Erden I (2005) MRCP evaluation of biliary system following vagotomy and gastric surgery. Clin Imaging 29:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Hilgers R, et al. (2004) Catheter probe extraductal EUS reliably detects distal common bile duct abnormalities. Gastrointest Endosc 60:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wehrmann T, Martchenko K, Riphaus A (2009) Catheter probe extraductal ultrasonography vs. conventional endoscopic ultrasonography for detection of bile duct stones. Endoscopy 41:133–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P, et al. (2016) EFSUMB guidelines on interventional ultrasound (INVUS), part IV—EUS-guided interventions: general aspects and EUS-guided sampling (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 37:E33–E76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JH, Topazian M (2004) Pancreatic endosonography after Billroth II gastrectomy. Endoscopy 36:972–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A, et al. (2011) Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in a patient with prior Billroth II gastrectomy. Dig Endosc 23:162–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Siripun A, Sripongpun P, Ovartlarnporn B (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary intervention in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Word J Gastrointest Endosc 7:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin A, Kistler CA, Wrobel P, Yang JF, Siddiqui AA (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreaticobiliary intervention in patients with surgically altered anatomy and inaccessible papillae: a review of current literature. Endosc Ultrasound 5:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fusaroli P, Serrani M, Lisotti A, et al. (2015) Performance of the forward-view echoendoscope for pancreaticobiliary examination in patients with status post-upper gastrointestinal surgery. Endosc Ultrasound 4:336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Togliani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Togliani, T., Pilati, S., Lisotti, A. et al. Catheter probe extraductal ultrasound (EDUS) exploration of the common bile duct is safe in elderly patients with suspicion of choledocholithiasis after distal gastrectomy. Abdom Radiol 43, 2987–2990 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1580-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1580-6

Keywords

Navigation