Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging of acute anorectal conditions with CT and MRI

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anorectal disorders are a common cause of presentation to the emergency department (ED). While the most frequently encountered anorectal conditions, such as hemorrhoids and anal fissures, are relatively benign and do not require imaging for diagnosis or management, there are multiple potentially life threatening anorectal conditions for which imaging is an important component of evaluation, diagnosis, and management. Although computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly used imaging modality for evaluation of anorectal pathology in the ED, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an increasingly important role in the detection, characterization and management of specific anorectal conditions. This pictorial essay will review the imaging anatomy of the anorectum, summarize imaging protocols, and discuss the clinical presentation, imaging appearance, and differential diagnosis of anorectal conditions that may present to the emergency department, including infectious, inflammatory, malignant and vascular conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tupe CL, Pham TV (2016) Anorectal complaints in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin N Am 34:251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grucela A, et al. (2010) Prospective analysis of clinician accuracy in the diagnosis of benign anal pathology: comparison across specialties and years of experience. Dis Colon Rectum 53:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinberg JA, et al. (2006) Penetrating rectal trauma: management by anatomic distinction improves outcome. J Trauma 60:508–513 ((discussion 513–514))

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parks AG (1961) Pathogenesis and treatment of fistuila-in-ano. Br Med J 1:463–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. de Miguel Criado J, et al. (2012) MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. RadioGraphics 32:175–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MERCURY Study Group (2007) Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study. Radiology 243:132–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Puylaert CAJ, Tielbeek JAW, Bipat S, Stoker J (2015) Grading of Crohn’s disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 25:3295–3313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Szyszko TA, Bush J, Gishen P, Sellu D, Desouza NM (2005) Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: a comparison of STIR with gadolinium-enhanced techniques. Acta Radiol 1987(46):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dohan A, et al. (2014) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the diagnosis of abscess complicating fistula-in-ano: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 24:2906–2915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Halligan S, Stoker J (2006) Imaging of fistula in ano 1. Radiology 239:18–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, Puni R, Steiner RE (1998) MRI of fistula-in-ano: a comparison of endoanal coil with external phased array coil techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:357–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman EK (2000) CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease1. RadioGraphics 20:399–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hordonneau C, et al. (2014) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease: validation of quantitative index of activity. Am J Gastroenterol 109:89–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tielbeek JAW, et al. (2014) Evaluation of conventional, dynamic contrast enhanced and diffusion weighted MRI for quantitative Crohn’s disease assessment with histopathology of surgical specimens. Eur Radiol 24:619–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis TW, Goldstone SE (2009) Sexually transmitted infections as a cause of proctitis in men who have sex with men. Dis Colon Rectum 52:507–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pisani Ceretti A, et al. (2015) The great pretender: rectal syphilis mimic a cancer. Case Rep Surg 2015:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akdamar K, Martin RJ, Ichinose H (1977) Syphilitic proctitis. Am J Dig Dis 22:701–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cha JM, Choi SI, Lee JI (2010) Rectal syphilis mimicking rectal cancer. Yonsei Med J 51:276

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Heffernan C, Pachter HL, Megibow AJ, Macari M (2005) Stercoral colitis leading to fatal peritonitis: CT findings. Am J Roentgenol 184:1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wittenberg J, Harisinghani MG, Jhaveri K, Varghese J, Mueller PR (2002) Algorithmic approach to CT diagnosis of the abnormal bowel wall 1. Radiographics 22:1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarin A, Safar B (2013) Management of radiation proctitis. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 42:913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kennedy G, Heise C (2007) Radiation colitis and proctitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 20:064–072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharif S, Hyser M (2006) Ischemic proctitis: case series and literature review. Am Surg 72:1241–1247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiesner W, et al. (2002) CT findings in isolated ischemic proctosigmoiditis. Eur Radiol 12:1762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiesner W, Khurana B, Ji H, Ros PR (2003) CT of acute bowel ischemia1. Radiology 226:635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Parks AG (1963) Etiology and surgical treatment of fistulain-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 6:17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Whiteford M (2007) Perianal abscess/fistula disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 20:102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Caliste X, et al. (2011) Sensitivity of computed tomography in detection of perirectal abscess. Am Surg 77:166–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lohsiriwat V (2012) Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol 18:2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Malley RB, et al. (2012) Rectal imaging: part 2, perianal fistula evaluation on pelvic MRI–what the radiologist needs to know. Am J Roentgenol 199:W43–W53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Beckingham IJ, et al. (1996) Prospective evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fistula in ano. Br J Surg 83:1396–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoker J, Rociu E, Zwamborn AW, Schouten WR, Laméris JS (1999) Endoluminal MR imaging of the rectum and anus: technique, applications, and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 19:383–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stoker J, Rociu E, Schouten WR, Laméris JS (2002) Anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas: endoluminal sonography versus endoluminal MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 178:737–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK (1990) CT evaluation of enterovaginal and vesicovaginal fistulas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14:390–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Muñoz M, et al. (1998) Management of acquired rectourinary fistulas: outcome according to cause. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1230–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kavanagh D, et al. (2005) Diagnosis and treatment of enterovesical fistulae. Colorectal Dis 7:286–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pickhardt PJ, Bhalla S, Balfe DM (2002) Acquired gastrointestinal fistulas: classification, etiologies, and imaging evaluation1. Radiology 224:9–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tang YZ, et al. (2012) Imaging features of colovesical fistulae on MRI. Br J Radiol 85:1371–1375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ravichandran S, Ahmed HU, Matanhelia SS, Dobson M (2008) Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing colovesical fistulas? Urology 72:832–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jaffe T, Thompson WM (2015) Large-bowel obstruction in the adult: classic radiographic and CT findings, etiology, and mimics. Radiology 275:651–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Low RN, Chen SC, Barone R (2003) Distinguishing benign from malignant bowel obstruction in patients with malignancy: findings at MR imaging1. Radiology 228:157–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SW, Kim HC, Yang DM (2012) Perforated tumours in the gastrointestinal tract: CT findings and clinical implications. Br J Radiol 85:1307–1313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Abdelrazeq AS, et al. (2008) The impact of spontaneous tumour perforation on outcome following colon cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:775–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirchhoff P, Clavien P-A, Hahnloser D (2010) Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg 4:5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Weinstein S, Osei-Bonsu S, Aslam R, Yee J (2013) Multidetector CT of the postoperative colon: review of normal appearances and common complications. RadioGraphics 33:515–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cherukuri R, et al. (1998) Hartmann’s pouch: radiographic evaluation of postoperative findings. Am J Roentgenol 171:1577–1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Preethi Guniganti.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.

Additional information

CME activity This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit https://ce.mayo.edu/node/27950 and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guniganti, P., Lewis, S., Rosen, A. et al. Imaging of acute anorectal conditions with CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol 42, 403–422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0982-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0982-6

Keywords

Navigation