Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimizing modality selection for image-guided procedures: an analysis of the challenges to ultrasound guidance

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Selection of the most appropriate modality for image guidance is essential for procedural success. We identified specific factors contributing to failure of ultrasound-guided procedures that were subsequently performed using CT guidance.

Materials and methods

This single-center, retrospective study included 164 patients who underwent a CT-guided biopsy, aspiration/drainage, or ablation after initially having the same procedure attempted unsuccessfully with ultrasound guidance. Review of the procedure images, reports, biopsy results, and clinical follow-up was performed and the reasons for inability to perform the procedure with ultrasound guidance were recorded. Patient cross-sectional area and depth to target were calculated. Differences in area and depth were compared using general linear modeling. Depth as a predictor of an unfavorable body habitus designation was modeled using logistic regression.

Results

US guidance was successful in the vast majority of cases (97%). Of the 164 procedures, there were 92 (56%) biopsies, 63 (38%) aspirations/drainages, and 9 (5%) ablations. The most common reason for procedure failure was poor acoustic window (83/164, 51%). Other reasons included target lesion being poorly discerned from adjacent tissue (61/164, 37%), adjacent bowel gas (34/164, 21%), body habitus (27/164, 16%), and gas-containing collection (22/164, 13%). Within the biopsy subgroup, patients for whom body habitus was a limiting factor were found to have on average a larger cross-sectional area and lesion depth relative to patients whose body habitus was not a complicating factor (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0009).

Conclusion

Poor acoustic window was the most common reason for procedural failure with ultrasound guidance. In addition, as lesion depth increased, the odds that body habitus would limit the procedure also increased. If preliminary imaging suggests a limited sonographic window, particularly for deeper lesions, proceeding directly to CT guidance should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black WC, Welch HG (1993) Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy. N Engl J Med 328:1237–1243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK (2006) Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. NCI J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1331–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Saifuddin A, Briggs T, Cannon S (2009) Does image guidance improve accuracy of core needle biopsy in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours? Acta Orthop Belg 75:239–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabandhu T, Tan MH, Mankin HJ (1998) Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. Am J Roentgenol 171:759–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hau A, Kim I, Kattapuram S, et al. (2002) Accuracy of CT-guided biopsies in 359 patients with musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol 31:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montgomery RS, Wilson SE (1996) Intraabdominal abscesses: image-guided diagnosis and therapy. Clin Infect Dis 23:28–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balint PV, Kane D, Hunter J, et al. (2002) Ultrasound guided versus conventional joint and soft tissue fluid aspiration in rheumatology practice: a pilot study. J Rheumatol 29:2209–2213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones PW, Moyers JP, Rogers JT, et al. (2003) Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method? Chest 123:418–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes T, Morgenthaler TI, Olson EJ, et al. (2005) Sonographically guided thoracentesis and rate of pneumothorax. J Clin Ultrasound 33:442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krishnappa P, Ramakrishnappa S, Kulkarni MH (2013) Comparison of free hand versus ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid with histopathological correlation. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 32:149–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Caoili EM, Bude RO, Higgins EJ, Hoff DL, Nghiem HV (2002) Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. Am J Roentgenol 179:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, DiPetrillo TA, et al. (2007) Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation: long-term safety and efficacy in 153 patients. Radiology 243:268–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guenette JP, Monchik JM, Dupuy DE (2013) Image-guided ablation of postsurgical locoregional recurrence of biopsy-proven well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:672–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salem S, Ponsky LE, Abouassaly R, et al. (2013) Image-guided biopsy of small renal masses in the era of ablative therapies. Int J Urol 20:580–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta S, Madoff DC (2007) Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cancer diagnosis and staging. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 10:88–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Douglas BR, Charboneau JW, Reading CC (2001) Ultrasound-guided intervention. radiologic. Clinics 39:415–428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Toth TL, et al. (2008) Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study. Am J Roentgenol 190:W100–W105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beland MD, Scappaticci AA, Machan JT, et al. (2013) Effect of patient size on mean sterile water attenuation during multiphase CT examinations. Am J Roentgenol 200:1048–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma X, Arellano RS, Gervais DA, et al. (2010) Success of image-guided biopsy for small (<3 cm) focal liver lesions in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic individuals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:1539–1547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SY, Park BK, Kim CK, Kwon GY (2013) Ultrasound-guided core biopsy of small renal masses: diagnostic rate and limitations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang J, Frassica FJ, Fayad L, Clark DP, Weber KL (2010) Analysis of nondiagnostic results after image-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3103–3111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Beland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Beland is a consultant for Hitachi Aloka, Inc. Dr. Dupuy has the following: Grant support: Medtronic, Galil Medical, Neuwave Medical. Board of Directors: Perseon Medical. Medical consultant: Perseon Medical. Honoraria: Educational Symposia. Royalities: Uptodate, Springer Verlag. Dr. Sternick, Dr. Cronan, Grayson Baird, and Dr. Mayo-Smith have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived by Institutional Review Board for this retrospective study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beland, M.D., Sternick, L.A., Baird, G.L. et al. Optimizing modality selection for image-guided procedures: an analysis of the challenges to ultrasound guidance. Abdom Radiol 41, 590–599 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0637-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0637-7

Keywords

Navigation