Skip to main content
Log in

Use of a web-based image reporting and tracking system for assessing abdominal imaging examination quality issues in a single practice

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents our local experience in the implementation of a real-time web-based system for reporting and tracking quality issues relating to abdominal imaging examinations. This system allows radiologists to electronically submit examination quality issues during clinical readouts. The submitted information is e-mailed to a designate for the given modality for further follow-up; the designate may subsequently enter text describing their response or action taken, which is e-mailed back to the radiologist. Review of 558 entries over a 6-year period demonstrated documentation of a broad range of examination quality issues, including specific issues relating to protocol deviation, post-processing errors, positioning errors, artifacts, and IT concerns. The most common issues varied among US, CT, MRI, radiography, and fluoroscopy. In addition, the most common issues resulting in a patient recall for repeat imaging (generally related to protocol deviation in MRI and US) were identified. In addition to submitting quality problems, radiologists also commonly used the tool to provide recognition of a well-performed examination. An electronic log of actions taken in response to radiologists’ submissions indicated that both positive and negative feedback were commonly communicated to the performing technologist. Information generated using the tool can be used to guide subsequent quality improvement initiatives within a practice, including continued protocol standardization as well as education of technologists in the optimization of abdominal imaging examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGinty GB, Allen B Jr, Geis JR, Wald C (2014) IT infrastructure in the era of imaging 3.0. J Am Coll Radiol 11(12 Pt B):1197–1204. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Norbash A, Bluth E, Lee CI, et al. (2014) Radiologist manpower considerations and imaging 3.0: effort planning for value-based imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 11(10):953–958. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Czuczman GJ, Pomerantz SR, Alkasab TK, Huang AJ (2013) Using a web-based image quality assurance reporting system to improve image quality. Am J Roentgenol 201(2):361–368. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagy PG, Pierce B, Otto M, Safdar NM (2008) Quality control management and communication between radiologists and technologists. J Am Coll Radiol 5(6):759–765. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2008.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McNamee M, Smith J (2014) Research essentials. Nurs Child Young People 26(9):12. doi:10.7748/ncyp.26.9.12.s14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Corn JB (2009) Six sigma in health care. Radiol Technol 81(1):92–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gottumukkala R, Street M, Fitzpatrick M, Tatineny P, Duncan JR (2012) Improving team performance during the preprocedure time-out in pediatric interventional radiology. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety/Joint Commission Resources 38(9):387–394

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no disclosures related to the work under consideration or outside of the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew B. Rosenkrantz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenkrantz, A.B., Johnson, E. & Sanger, J.J. Use of a web-based image reporting and tracking system for assessing abdominal imaging examination quality issues in a single practice. Abdom Imaging 40, 3354–3358 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0502-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0502-0

Keywords

Navigation