Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative ultrasound accurately characterizes surgically confirmed extracranial spinal accessory nerve injuries

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound and MRI in surgically confirmed spinal accessory nerve injuries and present the benefits of a multimodality image review.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 38 consecutive patients referred to a peripheral nerve surgical practice at an academic teaching hospital with surgically confirmed spinal accessory nerve injuries. All cases were reviewed for patient demographics, date and cause of injury, preoperative EMG, and surgical diagnosis and management. Additionally, prospective interpretation of preoperative ultrasound and MRI reports were reviewed for concordance or discordance with the surgical diagnosis.

Results

Iatrogenic injury was present in 37 (97%) cases and most commonly a result of an excisional lymph node biopsy (68%). Surgically confirmed spinal accessory nerve injury diagnoses consisted of 25 (66%) stump neuromas and 13 (34%) incomplete nerve injuries. Nine months was the average time from injury to surgery. Twenty-nine patients underwent preoperative ultrasound and/or MRI evaluation: 12 ultrasound only, 10 MRI only, and seven with both ultrasound and MRI. Eighteen (95%) preoperative ultrasound reports compared to four (24%) preoperative MRI reports were concordant with the surgical diagnosis. In the seven cases with both preoperative ultrasound and MRI, six had discordant ultrasound and MRI imaging diagnoses for which the ultrasound was concordant with the surgical diagnoses in all cases.

Conclusion

Preoperative ultrasound more accurately characterizes spinal accessory nerve injuries compared to MRI and should serve as the modality of choice when a spinal accessory nerve injury is suspected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarrazin JL, Toulgoat F, Benoudiba F. The lower cranial nerves: IX, X, XI XII. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(10):1051–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wills AJ, Sawle GV. Accessory nerve palsies. Pract Neurol. 2010;10(4):191–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cesmebasi A, Smith J, Spinner RJ. Role of sonography in surgical decision making for iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve injuries: a paradigm shift. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(12):2305–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Policeni BA, Smoker WR. Pathologic conditions of the lower cranial nerves IX, X, XI, and XII. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2008;18(2):347–68, xi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Massey EW. Spinal accessory nerve lesions. Semin Neurol. 2009;29(1):82–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laine FJ, Underhill T. Imaging of the lower cranial nerves. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2002;10(3):433–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Cheng KL, Choi YJ, Baek JH. High-resolution imaging of neural anatomy and pathology of the neck. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(1):180–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Madani A, Creteur V. Nerves around the shoulder: what the radiologist should know? J Belg Soc Radiol. 2017;101(S2):9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams WW, Twyman RS, Donell ST, Birch R. The posterior triangle and the painful shoulder: spinal accessory nerve injury. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996;78(6):521–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirjalili SA, Muirhead JC, Stringer MD. Ultrasound visualization of the spinal accessory nerve in vivo. J Surg Res. 2012;175(1):e11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker GD, Harnsberger HR. Radiologic evaluation of the normal and diseased posterior cervical space. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(1):161–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Canella C, Demondion X, Abreu E, Marchiori E, Cotten H, Cotten A. Anatomical study of spinal accessory nerve using ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(1):56–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Durazzo MD, Furlan JC, Teixeira GV, Friguglietti CU, Kulcsar MA, Magalhães RP, Ferraz AR, Brandão LG. Anatomic landmarks for localization of the spinal accessory nerve. Clin Anat. 2009;22(4):471–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bodner G, Harpf C, Gardetto A, Kovacs P, Gruber H, Peer S, Mallhoui A. Ultrasonography of the accessory nerve: normal and pathologic findings in cadavers and patients with iatrogenic accessory nerve palsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(10):1159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boström D, Dahlin LB. Iatrogenic injury to the accessory nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2007;41(2):82–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li AE, Greditzer HG, Melisaratos DP, Wolfe SW, Feinberg JH, Sneag DB. MRI findings of spinal accessory neuropathy. Clin Radiol. 2016;71(4):316–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hudgins PA, Kingdom TT, Weissler MC, Mukherji SK. Selective neck dissection: CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(5):1174–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Morris LG, Ziff DJ, DeLacure MD. Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(1):102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petchprapa CN, Rosenberg ZS, Sconfienza LM, Cavalcanti CF, Vieira RL, Zember JS. MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies of the lower extremity. Part 1. The pelvis and hip. Radiographics. 2010;30(4):983–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinoli C, Gandolfo N, Perez MM, Klauser A, Palmieri F, Padua L, Tagliafico A. Brachial plexus and nerves about the shoulder. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(5):523–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laughlin RS, Spinner RJ, Daube JR. Electrophysiological testing of spinal accessory nerve in suspected cases of nerve transection. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44(5):715–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Camp SJ, Birch R. Injuries to the spinal accessory nerve: a lesson to surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):62–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matz PG, Barbaro NM. Diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve injury. Am Surg. 1996;62(8):682–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedenberg SM, Zimprich T, Harper CM. The natural history of long thoracic and spinal accessory neuropathies. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25(4):535–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Desiree J. Lanzino, PT, PhD, for her help in editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrina N. Glazebrook.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powell, G.M., Baffour, F.I., Baillargeon, A.M. et al. Preoperative ultrasound accurately characterizes surgically confirmed extracranial spinal accessory nerve injuries. Skeletal Radiol 51, 1179–1188 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03945-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03945-y

Keywords

Navigation