Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reduction of artifacts caused by orthopedic hardware in the spine in spectral detector CT examinations using virtual monoenergetic image reconstructions and metal-artifact-reduction algorithms

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Aim of this study was to assess the artifact reduction in patients with orthopedic hardware in the spine as provided by (1) metal-artifact-reduction algorithms (O-MAR) and (2) virtual monoenergetic images (MonoE) as provided by spectral detector CT (SDCT) compared to conventional iterative reconstruction (CI).

Methods

In all, 28 consecutive patients with orthopedic hardware in the spine who underwent SDCT-examinations were included. CI, O-MAR and MonoE (40–200 keV) images were reconstructed. Attenuation (HU) and noise (SD) were measured in order to calculate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of paravertebral muscle and spinal canal. Subjective image quality was assessed by two radiologists in terms of image quality and extent of artifact reduction.

Results

O-MAR and high-keV MonoE showed significant decrease of hypodense artifacts in terms of higher attenuation as compared to CI (CI vs O-MAR, 200 keV MonoE: −396.5HU vs. –115.2HU, −48.1HU; both p ≤ 0.001). Further, artifacts as depicted by noise were reduced in O-MAR and high-keV MonoE as compared to CI in (1) paravertebral muscle and (2) spinal canal—CI vs. O-MAR/200 keV: (1) 34.7 ± 19.0 HU vs. 26.4 ± 14.4 HU, p ≤ 0.05/27.4 ± 16.1, n.s.; (2) 103.4 ± 61.3 HU vs. 72.6 ± 62.6 HU/60.9 ± 40.1 HU, both p ≤ 0.001. Subjectively both O-MAR and high-keV images yielded an artifact reduction in up to 24/28 patients.

Conclusion

Both, O-MAR and high-keV MonoE reconstructions as provided by SDCT lead to objective and subjective artifact reduction, thus the combination of O-MAR and MonoE seems promising for further reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Douglas-Akinwande AC, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Rankin JL, Choplin RH. Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware. RadioGraphics. 2006;26(Suppl 1):S97–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckwalter KA, Parr JA, Choplin RH, Capello WN. Multichannel CT imaging of orthopedic hardware and implants. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2006;10:86–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stradiotti P, Curti A, Castellazzi G, Zerbi A. Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:102–8.

  4. Mori I, Machida Y, Osanai M, Iinuma K. Photon starvation artifacts of X-ray CT: their true cause and a solution. Radiol Phys Technol. 2013;6:130–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalisz K, Buethe J, Saboo SS, Abbara S, Halliburton S, Rajiah P. Artifacts at cardiac CT: physics and solutions. RadioGraphics. 2016;36:2064–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bushberg JT. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray interactions. RadioGraphics. 1998;18:457–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee M-J, Kim S, Lee S-A, Song H-T, Huh Y-M, Kim D-H, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. RadioGraphics. 2007;27:791–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Becker CR, Johnson TRC. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson KM, Nowik P, Persliden J, Thunberg P, Norrman E. Metal artefact reduction in CT imaging of hip prostheses: an evaluation of commercial techniques provided by four vendors. Br J Radiol. 2015;88.

  10. Kuchenbecker S, Faby S, Sawall S, Lell M, Kachelrieß M. Dual energy CT: how well can pseudo-monochromatic imaging reduce metal artifacts? Med Phys. 2015;42:1023–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarez RE, Macovski A. Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography. Phys Med Biol. 1976;21:733–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuman WP, Green DE, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, et al. Dual-energy liver CT: effect of monochromatic imaging on lesion detection, conspicuity, and contrast-to-noise ratio of hypervascular lesions on late arterial phase. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:601–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Riederer SJ, Mistretta CA. Selective iodine imaging using K-edge energies in computerized x-ray tomography. Med Phys. 1977;4:474–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wellenberg RHH, Boomsma MF, van Osch JAC, Vlassenbroek A, Milles J, Edens MA, et al. Quantifying metal artefact reduction using virtual monochromatic dual-layer detector spectral CT imaging in unilateral and bilateral total hip prostheses. Eur J Radiol. 2017;88:61–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Secchi F, De Cecco CN, Spearman JV, Silverman JR, Ebersberger U, Sardanelli F, et al. Monoenergetic extrapolation of cardiac dual energy CT for artifact reduction. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:413–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Albrecht MH, Trommer J, Wichmann JL, Scholtz J-E, Martin SS, Lehnert T, et al. Comprehensive comparison of virtual monoenergetic and linearly blended reconstruction techniques in third-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography angiography of the thorax and abdomen. Investig Radiol. 2016;51:582–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Albrecht MH, Scholtz J-E, Hüsers K, Beeres M, Bucher AM, Kaup M, et al. Advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT angiography of the abdomen: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings to improve image contrast. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1863–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elder E, Schreibmann E, Dhabaan A. SU-F-T-407: artifact reduction with dual energy or IMAR: who’s winning? Med Phys. 2016;43:3556–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Philips CT Clinical Science PHU. Metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR) [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 10]. Available from: http://clinical.netforum.healthcare.philips.com/us_en/Explore/White-Papers/CT/Metal-Artifact-Reduction-for-Orthopedic-Implants-%28O-MAR%29.

  21. Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S, Tokuyasu S, Osakabe H, Harada K, et al. Reduction of dental metallic artefacts in CT: value of a newly developed algorithm for metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e11–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang JY, Kerns JR, Nute JL, Liu X, Balter PA, Stingo FC, et al. An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:1047–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Boomsma MF, Warringa N, Edens MA, Mueller D, Ettema HB, Verheyen CCPM, et al. Quantitative analysis of orthopedic metal artefact reduction in 64-slice computed tomography scans in large head metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a phantom study. Springerplus. 2016;Apr 2;5:405.

  24. Aissa J, Thomas C, Sawicki LM, Caspers J, Kröpil P, Antoch G, et al. Iterative metal artefact reduction in CT: can dedicated algorithms improve image quality after spinal instrumentation? Clin Radiol. 2017;May;72(5):428.e7–12

  25. Mangold S, Gatidis S, Luz O, König B, Schabel C, Bongers MN, et al. Single-source dual-energy computed tomography: use of monoenergetic extrapolation for a reduction of metal artifacts. Investig Radiol. 2014;49:788–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aissa J, Boos J, Schleich C, Sedlmair M, Krzymyk K, Kröpil P, et al. Metal artifact reduction in computed tomography after deep brain stimulation electrode placement using iterative reconstructions. Investig Radiol. 2017;52:18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guggenberger R, Winklhofer S, Osterhoff G, Wanner GA, Fortunati M, Andreisek G, et al. Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2357–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    Nils Große Hokamp, V. Neuhaus, N. Abdullayev, K. Laukamp, S. Lennartz, A. Mpotsaris & J. Borggrefe

Authors
  1. Nils Große Hokamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Neuhaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Abdullayev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Laukamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Lennartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Mpotsaris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Borggrefe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Große Hokamp.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and conducted this study independent from commercial interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Große Hokamp, N., Neuhaus, V., Abdullayev, N. et al. Reduction of artifacts caused by orthopedic hardware in the spine in spectral detector CT examinations using virtual monoenergetic image reconstructions and metal-artifact-reduction algorithms. Skeletal Radiol 47, 195–201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2776-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2776-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation