Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided pars interarticularis injections on immediate and short-term pain relief

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the accuracy and short-term efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided steroid/anesthetic injections for symptomatic pars interarticularis (pars) defects.

Materials and methods

Following IRB approval, all fluoroscopically guided pars injections from a single institution (6/2010 to 3/2016) were retrospectively and independently reviewed by two MSK radiologists. The radiologists evaluated the fluoroscopic images to determine if all of the pars injections associated with each procedure were intra-pars (n = 57 procedures; 106 pars injections), peri-pars (n = 3 procedures; three pars injected), or a combination of intra-pars and peri-pars (n = 6 procedures; 12 pars injected). The patients were asked their pain score (graded on a scale of 0–10) pre-injection, 5–10 min and 1-week post-injection. Age, gender, and fluoroscopic times were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed on the all intra-pars injections only.

Results

Exact inter-reader agreement was present in 92 % (112/121) of the injections, with 57 of the procedures (106 pars injections) performed on 41 patients (mean age 36; 18 M, 23 F) all intra-pars. The mean pre-injection and 5–10 min post-injection reduction in pain for the all intra-pars injections was −3.0 units (95 % CI: [−3.9, −2.1] units; p < 0.001) with a mean 1-week post-injection (n = 21 procedures; 38 pars) reduction in pain of −0.7 units (95 % CI [−1.5, 0.0]; p = 0.06). The geometric mean fluoroscopic time per pars injected was 42 s.

Conclusions

Over 92 % of fluoroscopically guided injections for symptomatic spondylolysis are technically successful with minimum fluoroscopic time, resulting in statistically significant pain reduction immediately post-injection and a trend in pain reduction 1-week post-injection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiltse LL, Widell Jr EH, Jackson DW. Fatigue fracture: the basic lesion is isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1975;57A:17–22 [Am].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fredrickson BE. The natural history of spondylosis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984;66A:669–707.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter DJ. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine. 2009;34(2):199–205 (Phila Pa 1976).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujii K. Union of defects in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar spine in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:225–31. Br.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lusins JO, Elting JJ, Cicoria AD, Goldsmith SJ. SPECT evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1994;5:608–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanda J, Bethem D, Moats W, Lew M. Defects of pars interarticularis in athletes: a protocol for nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6:406–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ward CV, Latimer BP, Alander DH, et al. Radiographic assessment of lumbar facet distance spacing and spondylolysis. Spine. 2007;32:E85–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petron DJ, Prideaux CC, Likness L. Interventional spine procedures in athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012;11(6):335–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossi F, Dragoni S. The prevalence of spondylosis and spondylolisthesis in symptomatic elite athletes: radiographic findings. Radiology. 2001;7:37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Soler T, Calderon C. The prevalence of spondylolysis in the Spanish elite athlete. Am J Sports Med. 2000;1:57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mooney V, Robertson J. The facet syndrome. Clin Orthop. 1976;115:149–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Micheli LJ, Wood R. Back pain in young athletes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:15–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maldague B, Mathurin P, Malghem J. Facet joint arthrography in lumbar spondylolysis. Radiology. 1981;140:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wald JT et al. A practice audit of CT-guided injections of pars interarticularis defects in patients with axial low back pain: a primer for further investigation. Pain Med. 2014;15:745–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarazin L et al. Lumbar facet joint arthrography with the posterior approach. Radiographics. 1999;19(1):93–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. 1967; vol. I, pp. 221–33.

  17. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schneiderman GA, McLain RF, Hambly MF, Nielsen SL. The pars defect as a pain source. A histologic study. Spine. 1995;20:1761–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Omidi-Kashani F, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Salari S. Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: who should behave surgery? An algorithmic approach. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(6):856–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu SS, Lee CH, Chen PQ. Operative repair of symptomatic spondylolysis following a positive response to diagnostic pars injection. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12:10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sys J, Michielsen J, Bracke P, et al. Nonoperative treatment of active spondylolysis in elite athletes with normal x-ray findings: literature review and results of conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Suh PB, Esses SI, Kostuik JP. The prognostic value of pars infiltration. Spine. 1991;16:S445–448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McCormick CC, Taylor JR, Twomey LT. Facet joint arthrography in lumbar spondylolysis: anatomic basis for spread of contrast medium. Radiology. 1989;17:193–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghelman B, Doherty JH. Demonstration of spondylolysis by arthrography of the apophyseal joint. Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130(5):986–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Khoury GY, Renfrew DL. Percutaneous procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of lower back pain: discography, facet-joint injection, and epidural injection. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:685–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Fox.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no grants or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kershen, L.M., Nacey, N.C., Patrie, J.T. et al. Accuracy and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided pars interarticularis injections on immediate and short-term pain relief. Skeletal Radiol 45, 1329–1335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2427-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2427-2

Keywords

Navigation