Abstract
Corynebacterium glutamicum is widely used to produce amino acids and is a chassis for the production of value-added compounds. Effective genome engineering methods are crucial to metabolic engineering and synthetic biology studies of C. glutamicum. Herein, a homing endonuclease I-SceI-mediated genome engineering strategy was established for the model strain C. glutamicum ATCC 13032. A vegetative R6K replicon-based, suicide plasmid was employed. The plasmid, pLS3661, contains both tightly regulated, IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside)-inducible I-SceI expression elements and two I-SceI recognition sites. Following cloning of the homologous arms into pLS3661 and transfer the recombinant vector into C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, through the homologous recombination between the cloned fragment and its chromosomal allele, a merodiploid was selected under kanamycin selection. Subsequently, a merodiploid was resolved by double-stranded break repair stimulated by IPTG-stimulated I-SceI expression, generating desired mutants. The protocol obviates a pre-generated strain, transfer of a second I-SceI expression plasmid, and there is not any strain, medium, and temperature restrictions. We validated the approach via deletions of five genes (up to ~ 13.0 kb) and knock-in of one DNA fragment. Furthermore, through kanamycin resistance repair, the ssDNA recombineering parameters were optimized. We hope the highly efficient method will be helpful for the studies of C. glutamicum, and potentially, to other bacteria.
Key Points
• Counterselection marker I-SceI-mediated C. glutamicum genome engineering
• A suicide vector contains I-SceI expression elements and its recognition sites
• Gene deletions and knock-in were conducted; efficiency was as high as 90%
• Through antibiotic resistance repair, ssDNA recombineering parameters were optimized
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumgart M, Unthan S, Kloss R, Radek A, Polen T, Tenhaef N, Muller MF, Kuberl A, Siebert D, Bruhl N, Marin K, Hans S, Kramer R, Bott M, Kalinowski J, Wiechert W, Seibold G, Frunzke J, Ruckert C, Wendisch VF, Noack S (2018) Corynebacterium glutamicum chassis C1*: building and testing a novel platform host for synthetic biology and industrial biotechnology. ACS Synth Biol 7:132–144. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00261
Becker J, Rohles CM, Wittmann C (2018) Metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum for bio-based production of chemicals, fuels, materials, and healthcare products. Metab Eng 50:122–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2018.07.008
Binder S, Siedler S, Marienhagen J, Bott M, Eggeling L (2013) Recombineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum combined with optical nanosensors: a general strategy for fast producer strain generation. Nucleic Acids Res 41:6360–6369. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt312
Bloor AE, Cranenburgh RM (2006) An efficient method of selectable marker gene excision by Xer recombination for gene replacement in bacterial chromosomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2520–2525. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.4.2520-2525.2006
Chen Z, Ling W, Shang G (2016) Recombineering and I-SceI-mediated Pseudomonas putida KT2440 scarless gene deletion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363:fnw231. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnw231
Cho JS, Choi KR, Prabowo CPS, Shin JH, Yang D, Jang J, Lee SY (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-coupled recombineering for metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab Eng 42:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.06.010
Choi JW, Jeon EJ, Jeong KJ (2019) Recent advances in engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for utilization of hemicellulosic biomass. Curr Opin Biotechnol 57:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2018.11.004
Cleto S, Jensen JV, Wendisch VF, Lu TK (2016) Corynebacterium glutamicum metabolic engineering with CRISPR interference (CRISPRi). ACS Synth Biol 5:375–385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00216
Cronan JE (2006) A family of arabinose-inducible Escherichia coli expression vectors having pBR322 copy control. Plasmid 55:152–157
Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645
Ellis HM, Yu D, DiTizio T, Court DL (2001) High efficiency mutagenesis, repair, and engineering of chromosomal DNA using single-stranded oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:6742–6746
Flannagan RS, Linn T, Valvano MA (2008) A system for the construction of targeted unmarked gene deletions in the genus Burkholderia. Environ Microbiol 10:1652–1660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01576.x
Fu R, Voordouw G (1997) Targeted gene-replacement mutagenesis of dcrA, encoding an oxygen sensor of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Microbiology 143(Pt 6):1815–1826. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-6-1815
Jiang Y, Qian F, Yang J, Liu Y, Dong F, Xu C, Sun B, Chen B, Xu X, Li Y, Wang R, Yang S (2017) CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Nat Commun 8:15179. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15179
Kalinowski J, Bathe B, Bartels D, Bischoff N, Bott M, Burkovski A, Dusch N, Eggeling L, Eikmanns BJ, Gaigalat L, Goesmann A, Hartmann M, Huthmacher K, Krämer R, Linke B, McHardy AC, Meyer F, Mockel B, Pfefferle W, Pühler A, Rey DA, Rückert C, Rupp O, Sahm H, Wendisch VF, Wiegräbe I, Tauch A (2003) The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate-derived amino acids and vitamins. J Biotechnol 104:5–25
Kim IK, Jeong WK, Lim SH, Hwang IK, Kim YH (2011) The small ribosomal protein S12P gene rpsL as an efficient positive selection marker in allelic exchange mutation systems for Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Microbiol Methods 84:128–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.007
Knoppová M, Phensaijai M, Vesely M, Zemanová M, Nešvera J, Pátek M (2007) Plasmid vectors for testing in vivo promoter activities in Corynebacterium glutamicum and Rhodococcus erythropolis. Curr Microbiol 55:234–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-0106-1
Kolisnychenko V, Plunkett G 3rd, Herring CD, Feher T, Posfai J, Blattner FR, Posfai G (2002) Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res 12:640–647
Lee JH, Wendisch VF (2017) Production of amino acids - genetic and metabolic engineering approaches. Bioresour Technol 245:1575–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.065
Li J, Sun J, Gao X, Wu Z, Shang G (2019) Coupling ssDNA recombineering with CRISPR-Cas9 for Escherichia coli DnaG mutations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:3559–3570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09744-9
Luo X, Li L, Chai M, Zhang Q, Shang G (2015) Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) chromosome-based controlled intracellular processing system for fusion protein separation. J Microbiol Methods 114:35–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2015.04.013
Ma W, Wang X, Mao Y, Wang Z, Chen T, Zhao X (2015) Development of a markerless gene replacement system in Corynebacterium glutamicum using upp as a counter-selection marker. Biotechnol Lett 37:609–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1718-8
Martinez-Garcia E, de Lorenzo V (2011) Engineering multiple genomic deletions in gram-negative bacteria: analysis of the multi-resistant antibiotic profile of Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol 13:2702–2716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02538.x
Mosberg JA, Lajoie MJ, Church GM (2010) Lambda red recombineering in Escherichia coli occurs through a fully single-stranded intermediate. Genetics 186:791–799. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.120782
Murphy KC (2016) λ recombination and Recombineering. EcoSal Plus. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0011-2015
Oh JH, van Pijkeren JP (2014) CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri. Nucleic Acids Res 42:e131. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku623
Okibe N, Suzuki N, Inui M, Yukawa H (2011) Efficient markerless gene replacement in Corynebacterium glutamicum using a new temperature-sensitive plasmid. J Microbiol Methods 85:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2011.02.012
Ouedraogo JP, Arentshorst M, Nikolaev I, Barends S, Ram AF (2015) I-SceI-mediated double-strand DNA breaks stimulate efficient gene targeting in the industrial fungus Trichoderma reesei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:10083–10095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6829-1
Perez-Garcia F, Jorge JMP, Dreyszas A, Risse JM, Wendisch VF (2018) Efficient production of the dicarboxylic acid glutarate by Corynebacterium glutamicum via a novel synthetic pathway. Front Microbiol 9:2589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02589
Ravasi P, Peiru S, Gramajo H, Menzella HG (2012) Design and testing of a synthetic biology framework for genetic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Factories 11:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-147
Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Sawitzke JA, Costantino N, Li XT, Thomason LC, Bubunenko M, Court C, Court DL (2011) Probing cellular processes with oligo-mediated recombination and using the knowledge gained to optimize recombineering. J Mol Biol 407:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.030
Schäfer A, Tauch A, Jäger W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Pühler A (1994) Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene 145:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(94)90324-7
Stansen C, Uy D, Delaunay S, Eggeling L, Goergen JL, Wendisch VF (2005) Characterization of a Corynebacterium glutamicum lactate utilization operon induced during temperature-triggered glutamate production. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5920–5928. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.10.5920-5928.2005
Suzuki N, Nonaka H, Tsuge Y, Okayama S, Inui M, Yukawa H (2005a) Multiple large segment deletion method for Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-1976-4
Suzuki N, Tsuge Y, Inui M, Yukawa H (2005b) Cre/loxP-mediated deletion system for large genome rearrangements in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1772-6
Theophilou ES, Vohra P, Gallagher MP, Poxton IR, Blakely GW (2019) Generation of markerless deletions in the nosocomial pathogen Clostridium difficile by induction of DNA double-strand breaks. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e02055–e02018. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02055-18
van der Rest ME, Lange C, Molenaar D (1999) A heat shock following electroporation induces highly efficient transformation of Corynebacterium glutamicum with xenogeneic plasmid DNA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:541–545
Wang T, Li Y, Li J, Zhang D, Cai N, Zhao G, Ma H, Shang C, Ma Q, Xu Q, Chen N (2019) An update of the suicide plasmid-mediated genome editing system in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol 12:907–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13444
Wu Z, Chen Z, Gao X, Li J, Shang G (2019) Combination of ssDNA recombineering and CRISPR-Cas9 for Pseudomonas putida KT2440 genome editing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:2783–2795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09654-w
Zhang Q, Yan Z, Xu Y, Sun J, Shang G (2017) Characterization of inducible ccdB gene as a counterselectable marker in Escherichia coli recombineering. Curr Microbiol 74:961–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1273-3
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. John Cronan, Dr. Lothar Eggling, Dr. Jan Nešvera, and Dr. Pablo Ravasi for providing the strain and plasmids.
Funding
Funding was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81273412).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GS conceived and designed research. MW, YX and JY conducted experiments. GS contributed reagents. All authors participated in the data analysis. GS wrote the manuscript with help from other authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 226 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, M., Xu, Y., Yang, J. et al. Homing endonuclease I-SceI-mediated Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104, 3597–3609 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10517-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10517-y