Abstract
Males and females often exhibit differences in behaviour, life histories, and ecology, many of which are typically reflected in their brains. Neuronal protection and maintenance include complex processes led by the microglia, which also interacts with metabolites such as hormones or immune components. Despite increasing interest in sex-specific brain function in laboratory animals, the significance of sex-specific immune activation in the brain of wild animals along with the variables that could affect it is widely lacking. Here, we use the Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) to study sex differences in expression of immune genes in the brain of adult males and females, in two wild populations breeding in contrasting habitats: a coastal sea-level population and a high-altitude inland population in China. Our analysis yielded 379 genes associated with immune function. We show a significant male-biased immune gene upregulation. Immune gene expression in the brain did not differ in upregulation between the coastal and inland populations. We discuss the role of dosage compensation in our findings and their evolutionary significance mediated by sex-specific survival and neuronal deterioration. Similar expression profiles in the coastal and inland populations suggest comparable genetic control by the microglia and possible similarities in pathogen pressures between habitats. We call for further studies on gene expression of males and females in wild population to understand the implications of immune function for life-histories and demography in natural systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sex differences in behaviour, morphology, and physiology are widespread in nature, with most dioecious animals thought to present at least some degree of sexual dimorphism. The brain — the centre of the nervous system in many organisms — is an example of one of these sexually dimorphic structures as it may differ in size, function and gene expression (Biswal et al. 2010; DeVoogd and Székely 1998; Kang et al. 2011). Sex differences (or sexual dimorphism as is usually termed) in the brain are being increasingly investigated using humans and laboratory animals. Although in wild species these topics have been considerably less explored, recent evidence suggests sex differences in neural organisation and gene expression in the brain (Catalán et al. 2012; Delage and Cornil 2020; Naurin et al. 2011; Rotllant et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2006).
With evidence suggesting the importance of functional and structural sex differences in the brain, it is possible that complementary processes such as disease risk and its defence response may also differ between the sexes. Indeed, sex differences are found in neuronal diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, where males exhibit a greater reduction in global cognition and language than females, or in Alzheimer disease, presenting women with faster rates of brain atrophy than males (Bakeberg et al. 2021; Ferretti et al. 2018). Understanding the causes of these differences are important, since many diseases — including the recent COVID-19 — have different mortality rates in males and females, ultimately resulting in sex-biased mortalities (e.g. Lemaître et al. 2020; Pipoly et al. 2015). Sex differences in microglial and astrocytic cells, such as their heightened sensitivity to inflammatory stimuli and their anatomical distribution (Lenz et al. 2013; Martin-Jiménez et al. 2019; Schwarz et al. 2012; Siani et al. 2017; Villa et al. 2018), have been postulated to mediate sex differences in cognition and memory in rodent models (Chamniansawat and Sawatdiyaphanon 2018; Yun et al. 2018). However, research addressing the main system responsible for inflammatory responses and pathogen defence, i.e., the immune system, in the brain of wild animals is widely lacking, despite showing important differences in various immune parameters between the sexes (Kelly et al. 2018; Klein and Flanagan 2016; Valdebenito et al. 2021).
In the nervous system, immune function seems to be under particularly intense modulation since an insufficient response may result in infection, but an excessive response could result in prolonged inflammation and tissue damage (Kawli et al. 2010). Also, in tissues like the brain, general immune factors seem to serve a variety of non-immunological functions (Derecki et al. 2010; Radjavi et al. 2014). Furthermore, many variables may influence the immune response, including biotic and abiotic factors or the combination of both, as seen in some birds in the tropics that seem to upregulate aspects of their immune function in the wet season, presumably as defence mechanism against increased pathogen pressure that emerges from increased rainfall (Nwaogu et al. 2019; Tieleman et al. 2019).
The Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) is a small shorebird that is emerging as an ecological model system of sexually dimorphic reproduction and speciation (Székely 2019; Wang et al. 2019a, b). Kentish plovers are widely distributed along coastal and inland waterbodies across Eurasia and North Africa (del Hoyo et al. 2020). Previous studies on Kentish plover have found that males generally survive better than females in the wild (Eberhart-Phillips et al. 2018; Kosztolanyi et al. 2011). Though causes of sex-specific mortality may be non-exclusive and multifactorial (Székely et al. 2014), previous attempts in Kentish plover trying to link parasite burden and sex-specificity of infection have found comparable infection rates of blood parasites and pathogenic bacteria (Figuerola et al. 1996; Martínez-de la Puente et al. 2017; Valdebenito et al. 2020). Immune function, on the other hand, still remains undescribed in Kentish plover, being yet unknown whether males and females differ in immunity, or whether sex differences in immunity could be observed in the brain.
Here we investigate immune aspects in the male and female brain of Kentish plovers in two contrasting environments in China: the Bohai Bay located on the East coast and the Qinghai Lake located inland at high elevation in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. We focus on expression patterns of immune system genes, since a healthy immune system in the brain is essential for protecting the animal against infection and maintaining cognitive ability (Gimsa et al. 2013; Marin and Kipnis 2013; Minias and Podlaszczuk 2017; Sol et al. 2007). We quantify the expression of genes annotated with immune functions in four brain regions, with the aim of evaluating sex differences in immune genes (Ham and Lee 2020). We test two specific hypotheses. First, based on sex differences in gene expression in the brain in various bird species (e.g. Delage and Cornil 2020; Rotllant et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2014) and survival demographic analyses of Kentish plover (males survive better than females), we expect increased upregulation of immune genes in the male brain. Second, both Bohai Bay and the Qinghai Lake are stopovers of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway and the Central Asian Flyway, respectively. These environments show contrasting differences that could shape immune function due to local environmental factors such as pathogen pressure (e.g. Nwaogu et al. 2019). That is, increased chances of contact with other waterbirds, marine diversity, and their pathogens in the coastal site compared to the high-altitude inland site. Thus, we expect differences in immune gene expression between the sites, with a possible upregulation of immune genes in the coastal population.
Results
Differential expression analysis
We identified 403 transcripts associated with genes involved in immune processes (hereafter immune genes). After filtering out low counts (≤ 5), 379 immune genes were further processed. Of these, 11 genes had significant differences in expression pattern between the sexes, with 10 exhibiting male-biased upregulation and one having female-biased upregulation (Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 0.001, Table 1; Figs. 1A and 2). The male-biased immune genes were involved in the activation of various components of the immune system, whereas the female-biased gene was involved in T cell upregulation, consistent with a role in the activation of adaptive immunity (details in Table S1).
Comparing profiles of immune system gene expression between the two populations, we found 17 differentially expressed genes (Fig. 1B). The number of differentially upregulated immune genes did not differ between Bohai Bay and Qinghai Lake (9 and 8 genes, respectively; Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 0.807; Table 1). Here, gene functions corresponded largely to signal transduction associated to cytokine activation, but favouring functions of cellular metabolism in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau (Table S2).
Interaction analysis showed a significant effect of sex on environment, where in both the coastal and inland location, the same five immune genes were significantly overexpressed in males but not in females (Table 1; Fig. S1).
Chromosomal location
Out of 379 immune genes, 341 genes were located in the autosomes, 12 in the Z chromosome, with the remaining 26 genes not yet assigned to any chromosome. Nine out of 10 male-biased genes were linked to the Z chromosome, and one gene was located in the autosomes (Fig. 1). The location of the female-biased gene was in the autosomes (Fig. 1; Table 2a). In contrast, all differentially expressed genes identified when comparing the coastal and the inland environments (9 and 8 genes, respectively) were located in the autosomes (Fig. 1; Table 2b). Four out of 5 significantly male-biased overexpressed genes in the interaction analysis were located in the Z chromosome and one gene in the autosomes (Fig. S1).
Discussion
Here we showed that the vast majority of immune genes have similar expression levels between males and females, and between two ecologically different habitats. We identified 10 immune genes which had higher expression in males and one gene that was more highly expressed in females, though these represent only ~ 2.9% of all genes in the analysis. We further note that the magnitude of the differential gene expression was small, in all cases no larger than − 1/ + 1 Log2 fold change (full details in Table S3–S6).
Recent studies are addressing specific aspects of immune defence using transcriptomes in birds (e.g. Scalf et al. 2019; Videvall et al. 2015, 2020). Despite the growing importance of sex-specific research across disciplines (Moghadam et al. 2013; Wilson 2020), only the work of Wang et al. (2019c) has so far explored sex differences using blood samples in captive Eurasian magpies (Pica pica), finding important sex-biases in expression of genes related to stress resistance, immunity, energy metabolism, reproduction, and lifespan regulation. Genomic methods are powerful since they introduce a more holistic perspective in regards to a functional gene group, but it should be noted that the correlation between mRNA and protein concentrations could be inconsistent (Li et al. 2014; Lu et al. 2007) and that tissue type may influence gene expression profiles (Watson et al. 2017).
Differential gene expression between the male and female brain has been demonstrated in several species, but an emphasis on immune genes is rarely seen, hence the little knowledge about possible causes and consequences of this sex difference. Studies not distinguishing for sex in murine models describe an association between increased activation of innate immune genes in the brain and neuronal aging (Cribbs et al. 2012), alterations of social behaviour (Ma et al. 2015), and the risk of developing schizophrenia (Comer et al. 2020). Note that the microglia, the major source of immune genes in the brain, is known to regulate the brain functional connectivity and behaviour (Chen et al. 2010; Derecki et al. 2012; Squarzoni et al. 2014; Zhan et al. 2014). Moreover, genes associated with, for example, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), the complement, and their receptors, are known to be expressed in the brain and regulate brain structural and functional plasticity, either directly or indirectly by controlling microglial or immune activation (McAllister 2014; Perry and O'Connor 2008; Tian et al. 2009). Perhaps, sex-specific effects could be linked to the sex hormones, since the main female sex hormone, oestrogen, has been associated with several roles in the microglia, thought to drive behavioural differences during neuronal development in mammalian and avian models (Delage and Cornil 2020; Martin-Jiménez et al. 2019; Siani et al. 2017; Yun et al. 2018). Importantly, our results showed a male bias in highly differentially expressed immune genes. This coincides with our expectations based on demographic studies (biases in mortality and adult sex ratio; Eberhart-Phillips et al. 2018; Kosztolanyi et al. 2011), but further studies are needed to explore whether our findings in the brain actually entail a mortality cost for this bird. Though, perhaps in specific infections such as the filarial nematodes Chandlerella quiscali that often invades brain tissue in wild birds (Atkinson et al. 2008; Edwards et al. 2017), the difference in immune gene expression between males and females could determine a sex-specific advantage in defence. Also, it has been shown that intraspecific variation of the microglia between the sexes is of common occurrence in several neurodegenerative diseases in mammals (Martin-Jiménez et al. 2019; Schwarz et al. 2012; Villa et al. 2018); thus, our findings could be potentially linked with the development of such diseases in this manner. Unfortunately, research on sex-specific neurodegenerative diseases in wild birds is in its infancy.
Differentially expressed genes in males largely included roles in immune defence, control of cellular proliferation, and cytokine mediators. Only half of these genes were associated to roles in neuronal pathways, which may suggest that these immune genes might have a moderate to minor role in specific neuronal functions, possibly because, though unlikely, residual blood could remain trapped within the brain tissue. Our results showed that upregulated immune genes in the brain in the coastal environment was similar to the high-altitude habitat in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Because many immune genes expressed in the brain are believed to regulate behaviour and other cellular functions, this suggests that, in the individuals sampled, the genetic control of these processes seems rather uniform between environments. Furthermore, though our findings could also suggest that pathogen pressure in both environments were comparable (Lindström et al. 2004; Peuß et al. 2020), we deem this unlikely since overexpressed genes in the coastal environment seemed to largely serve functions of signal transduction posterior to cytokine activation (e.g. the FOXO3 and FOXP1 genes), whereas in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, there was more activation of genes associated to cellular metabolism, possibly due to the extreme environmental conditions such as high altitude. Interestingly, males from both the coastal and high-altitude environments had an overexpression of the same five genes, serving general functions of immune cell activation, with no evidence of activation of genes related to metabolism. One interpretation of this is that males of this species could have a similar baseline immune activation across the two environments.
We found that most male-biased genes were located on the Z chromosome. Interestingly, when comparing differential immune gene expression between the two environments, all upregulated genes belonged to the autosomes. This could suggest that the sex-biases in immune gene expression in Kentish plover are linked to the sex chromosomes, possibly expected due to the absence of dosage compensation in most birds (Heard and Disteche 2006; Itoh et al. 2007; Parsch and Ellegren 2013; Zhou et al. 2014). Unfortunately, there is not yet an assembly available for the W chromosome in Kentish plover (Wang et al. 2019a), which truncates further conclusions. Wang et al. (2019c) found in Eurasian magpies that, in general, males show more upregulated genes than females in the blood, although some specific immune pathways were found to be upregulated in females. Unfortunately, Wang et al. (2019c) did not characterise the chromosomal location of these genes.
Conclusion
The use of genomic methods is a convenient approach for addressing a wide range of specific questions. Though caution at interpretation is required because often single genes have several biological functions and these can differ between tissue type. Here we showed that, though small, sex but not environment has an effect on the upregulation of immune gene expression in Kentish plover. We do not know the impact that such differences could have on the bird’s life trajectory, but we nevertheless note that the direction of the sex-bias in immune genes met the expected predictions based on higher survival rate of male Kentish plover over females in the wild (Eberhart-Phillips et al. 2018). We are aware, however, that sex-specific mortality can be multifactorial and future studies should further the knowledge of sex differences in immune gene expression in this shorebird.
Materials and methods
Sampling
Fieldwork took place at two sites in China where the Kentish plover is a locally abundant breeder (Fig. S2): Bohai Bay at sea level (39° 7′6.22"N, 118°11′49.84"E; more details of the site are described in Que et al. 2015), and Qinghai Lake (Koko Nor), the largest lake in China at 3200 m above sea level (36°45′56.86"N, 100°43′21.68"E; Jian et al. 2021). Fieldwork was conducted during the breeding period in May 2015, capturing 24 incubating adults on the nest (6 males and 6 females at each site) followed by morphometric measurements according to a standard protocol (see Székely et al. 2008). To obtain blood and brain tissues, the birds were sacrificed conforming to the regulations of ethical conditions by the Chinese Animal Welfare Act (20,090,606), and of the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body of the University of Bath and the Institutional Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of Sun Yat-sen University (2005DKA21403-JK). This study did not involve endangered or protected species.
Tissue samples were collected from four brain regions based on their spatial location (basal forebrain and brainstem): the hypothalamus, medial extended amygdala, nucleus accumbens, and septum (Fig. S3). Apart from their specific function mediating social behaviour, these regions are run through several axonal tracts from superior areas in the forebrain.
Using a stainless-steel rat brain matrix, brain samples were dissected by first cutting the brain coronally in order to rostrocaudally standardise the tissue slabs, then each region of interest was manually dissected using a portable dissection microscope following a chicken brain atlas (Puelles et al. 2018). The Kentish plover and the chicken brain differ in morphology; thus, we used visible anatomical landmarks to define the approximate margins of the dissections. Brain tissue samples were stored in RNAlater (Qiagen) and kept cold (in the field) using either liquid nitrogen or cold blocks. At the end of each day, samples were stored in freezers (− 20 °C) and then once at the lab samples were stored at − 80 °C prior RNA extraction.
RNA extraction and sequencing
RNA extraction and sequencing of 96 brain samples were performed by Novogene Beijing. RNA degradation and contamination were monitored using 1% agarose gels, and RNA purity was assessed using a NanoPhotometer spectrometer (IMPLEN, CA, USA). RNA concentration and integrity were measured using a Qubit 2.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100, respectively. Sequencing libraries preparation used 3 μg RNA per sample and cluster formation was conducted following manufacturer’s recommendations (TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS, Illumina). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq platform. The outcome generated paired-end reads with a fragment length of 300–500 bp and an average paired end length of 150 bp, for a total of 519 millions of raw paired-end reads sequenced (~ 5.4 million paired-end reads per sample).
Transcriptome profile annotation
Reads were cleaned using Trimmomatic v0.35. All further analysis used these high-quality reads. Cleaned reads were aligned to the Kentish plover genome (Wang et al. (2019a); assembly ID ASM871129v1) using HISAT2 v2.1.0 (Kim et al. 2013). We used Samtools v1.2 (Li et al. 2009) to clean HISAT2 outputs in order to remove multi-mapped reads, unmapped reads, and unmapped mates (-q 40, -f 2, -F 12). Counts of raw read were extracted from cleaned HISAT2 outputs using HTSeq-count v0.11.2 (Anders et al. 2015).
Differential expression analysis
Differential expression analysis was performed on two different groupings of the dataset, i.e. population (Bohai Bay versus Qinghai Lake), sex, and the two-way interaction of population and sex. Genes were filtered and removed if the sum of all 24 samples had 5 or less counts per million mapped reads.
To examine expression performance of the regions sampled, we conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) that revealed no major distinction in expression between the regions except for the nucleus accumbens (Fig. S3). Importantly, the PCA suggests consistent tissue sampling in the field. Thus, we pooled all brain regions together (averaging counts of the four regions) for further analysis. The analysis of differential gene expression was performed between the sexes and populations using the function DESeq from the R statistical package DeSeq2 (Love et al. 2014). This function calculates differential expression based on the negative binomial (i.e. Gamma-Poisson) distribution, which is an advantage over earlier binomial models because it makes fewer type I errors (Anders and Huber 2010). The function operates estimating size factors, then estimating dispersion of each gene, to finish fitting negative binomial generalised linear models and Wald statistics (see DESeq documentation for further details). DESeq results were extracted specifying contrasts (male versus females; Bohai Bay versus Qinghai Lake) and false discovery rate < 0.05. Analyses were conducted in R version 3.3.2 (R Core Team 2016).
Gene ontology annotations and set enrichment analyses
Gene ontology enrichment categories and the extraction of GO terms followed methods previously described in Wang et al. (2019a). Briefly, we used BLASTP v.3.2.0 + (with an E-value of 1e-5 Altschul et al. 1990) to BLAST Kentish plover proteins against the RefSeq protein database. GO terms were then assigned using Blast2GO software v.4.1.9 (Götz et al. 2008) and merged with GO terms obtained from InterProScan v.5.25 (parameters: -f xml, -goterms, -iprlookup) (Jones et al. 2014). We evaluated GO terms from the domain biological processes and then the subcategory immune system processes. The gene enrichment analyses were performed using a hypergeometric test for overrepresentation and corrected for false positives with the Benjamini and Hochberg FDR correction (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Functional groups with a FDR P-value < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significantly overrepresented. Cases where the expected number of genes less than one were only classified as significantly enriched if the observed number of genes was higher than one.
Sex- and population-specific gene expression
We used Fisher’s exact tests to examine for differences between males and females in the proportion of up and downregulated sex-biased genes. The same method was used in statistical comparisons between population, and in the sex × population interaction.
Availability of data and materials
The full dataset can be downloaded from https://figshare.com/s/153d63db7e798269aa5d. Genome assembly is available at NCBI under accession ID ASM871129v1.
References
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
Anders S, Huber W (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11:R106. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106
Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W (2015) HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31:166–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
Atkinson CT, Thomas NJ, Hunter DB (2008) Parasitic diseases of wild birds. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey
Bakeberg MC, Gorecki AM, Kenna JE, Jefferson A, Byrnes M, Ghosh S et al (2021) Differential effects of sex on longitudinal patterns of cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 268:1903–1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10367-8
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 57:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Biswal BB, Mennes M, Zuo X-N, Gohel S, Kelly C, Smith SM et al (2010) Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4734. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911855107
Catalán A, Hutter S, Parsch J (2012) Population and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster brain gene expression. BMC Genomics 13:654. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-654
Chamniansawat S, Sawatdiyaphanon C (2018) Age-related memory impairment associated with decreased endogenous estradiol in the hippocampus of female rats. Int J Toxicol 37:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581818761653
Chen S-K, Tvrdik P, Peden E, Cho S, Wu S, Spangrude G et al (2010) Hematopoietic origin of pathological grooming in Hoxb8 mutant mice. Cell 141:775–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.055
Comer AL, Jinadasa T, Sriram B, Phadke RA, Kretsge LN, Nguyen TPH et al (2020) Increased expression of schizophrenia-associated gene C4 leads to hypoconnectivity of prefrontal cortex and reduced social interaction. PLoS Biol 18:e3000604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000604
Cribbs DH, Berchtold NC, Perreau V, Coleman PD, Rogers J, Tenner AJ et al (2012) Extensive innate immune gene activation accompanies brain aging, increasing vulnerability to cognitive decline and neurodegeneration: a microarray study. J Neuroinflammation 9:179. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-179
del Hoyo J, Wiersma P, Kirwan GM, Collar N, Boesman PFD, Sharpe CJ (2020) Kentish Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus), version 1.0. Birds of the World. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/kenplo1/cur/introduction#idsum. Accessed 19/08/2020
Delage CI, Cornil CA (2020) Estrogen-dependent sex difference in microglia in the developing brain of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Dev Neurobiol 80:239–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22781
Derecki NC, Cardani AN, Yang CH, Quinnies KM, Crihfield A, Lynch KR et al (2010) Regulation of learning and memory by meningeal immunity: a key role for IL-4. J Exp Med 207:1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20091419
Derecki NC, Cronk JC, Lu Z, Xu E, Abbott SBG, Guyenet PG et al (2012) Wild-type microglia arrest pathology in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Nature 484:105–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10907
DeVoogd TJ, Székely T (1998) Causes of avian song: using neurobiology to integrate proximate and ultimate levels of analysis. In Balda RP, Pepperberg IM, Kamil AC (eds.) Animal Cognition in Nature. Academic Press, London
Eberhart-Phillips LJ, Kupper C, Carmona-Isunza MC, Vincze O, Zefania S, Cruz-Lopez M et al (2018) Demographic causes of adult sex ratio variation and their consequences for parental cooperation. Nat Commun 9:1651. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03833-5
Edwards EE, Dangoudoubiyam S, Hoppes SM, Porter BF (2017) Granulomatous filarial encephalomyelitis caused by Chandlerella quiscali in a Northern Crested Caracara (Caracara cheriway). J Zoo Wildl Med 48:237–240. https://doi.org/10.1638/2016-0123.1
Ferretti MT, Iulita MF, Cavedo E, Chiesa PA, Schumacher Dimech A, Santuccione Chadha A et al (2018) Sex differences in Alzheimer disease — the gateway to precision medicine. Nat Rev Neurol 14:457–469. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0032-9
Figuerola J, Velarde R, Bertolero A, Cerdá F (1996) Abwesenheit von Haematozoa bei einer Brutpopulation des Seeregenpfeifers Charadrius alexandrinus in Nordspanien. J Ornithol 137:523–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01661106
Gimsa U, Mitchison NA, Brunner-Weinzierl MC (2013) Immune privilege as an intrinsic CNS property: astrocytes protect the CNS against T-cell-mediated neuroinflammation. Mediators Inflamm 2013:320519. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/320519
Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ et al (2008) High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3420–3435. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn176
Ham S, Lee S-JV (2020) Advances in transcriptome analysis of human brain aging. Exp Mol Med 52:1787–1797. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-00522-6
Heard E, Disteche CM (2006) Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome. Genes Dev 20:1848–1867. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1422906
Itoh Y, Melamed E, Yang X, Kampf K, Wang S, Yehya N et al (2007) Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. J Biol 6:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol53
Jian Y, Zhang X, Li X, Schou C, Charalambidou I, Ma L et al (2021) Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in wild birds from Qinghai Lake on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Parasitol Res 120:615–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06993-w
Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C et al (2014) InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031
Kang H, Kawasawa Y, Cheng F, Zhu Y, Xu X, Li M et al (2011) Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10523
Kawli T, He F, Tan M-W (2010) It takes nerves to fight infections: insights on neuro-immune interactions from C. elegans. Disease Models & Mechanisms 3:721. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.003871
Kelly CD, Stoehr AM, Nunn C, Smyth KN, Prokop ZM (2018) Sexual dimorphism in immunity across animals: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 21:1885–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13164
Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL (2013) TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol 14:R36. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36
Klein SL, Flanagan KL (2016) Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 16:626–638. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.90
Kosztolanyi A, Barta Z, Kupper C, Szekely T (2011) Persistence of an extreme male-biased adult sex ratio in a natural population of polyandrous bird. J Evol Biol 24:1842–1846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02305.x
Lemaître JF, Ronget V, Tidiere M, Allaine D, Berger V, Cohas A et al (2020) Sex differences in adult lifespan and aging rates of mortality across wild mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:8546–8553. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911999117
Lenz KM, Nugent BM, Haliyur R, McCarthy MM (2013) Microglia are essential to masculinization of brain and behavior. J Neurosci 33:2761. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1268-12.2013
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Li JJ, Bickel PJ, Biggin MD (2014) System wide analyses have underestimated protein abundances and the importance of transcription in mammals. PeerJ 2:e270. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.270
Lindström KM, Foufopoulos J, Pärn H, Wikelski M (2004) Immunological investments reflect parasite abundance in island populations of Darwin’s finches. Proc R Soc B 271:1513–1519. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2752
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, Yao X, Marcotte EM (2007) Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat Biotechnol 25:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1270
Ma L, Piirainen S, Kulesskaya N, Rauvala H, Tian L (2015) Association of brain immune genes with social behavior of inbred mouse strains. J Neuroinflammation 12:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0297-5
Marin I, Kipnis J (2013) Learning and memory and the immune system. Learn Mem 20:601–606. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.028357.112
Martin-Jiménez C, Gaitán-Vaca DM, Areiza N, Echeverria V, Ashraf GM, González J et al (2019) Astrocytes mediate protective actions of estrogenic compounds after traumatic brain injury. Neuroendocrinology 108:142–160. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495078
Martínez-de la Puente J, Eberhart-Phillips LJ, Cristina Carmona-Isunza M, Zefania S, Navarro MJ, Kruger O et al (2017) Extremely low Plasmodium prevalence in wild plovers and coursers from Cape Verde and Madagascar. Malar J 16:243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1892-y
McAllister AK (2014) Major histocompatibility complex I in brain development and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiat 75:262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.10.003
Minias P, Podlaszczuk P (2017) Longevity is associated with relative brain size in birds. Ecol Evol 7:3558–3566. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2961
Moghadam HK, Harrison PW, Zachar G, Székely T, Mank JE (2013) The plover neurotranscriptome assembly: transcriptomic analysis in an ecological model species without a reference genome. Mol Ecol Resour 13:696–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12096
Naurin S, Hansson B, Hasselquist D, Kim Y-H, Bensch S (2011) The sex-biased brain: sexual dimorphism in gene expression in two species of songbirds. BMC Genomics 12:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-37
Nwaogu CJ, Cresswell W, Versteegh MA, Tieleman BI (2019) Seasonal differences in baseline innate immune function are better explained by environment than annual cycle stage in a year-round breeding tropical songbird. J Anim Ecol 88:537–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12948
Parsch J, Ellegren H (2013) The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 14:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3376
Perry VH, O’Connor V (2008) C1q: the perfect complement for a synaptic feast? Nat Rev Neurosci 9:807–811. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2394
Peuß R, Box AC, Chen S, Wang Y, Tsuchiya D, Persons JL et al (2020) Adaptation to low parasite abundance affects immune investment and immunopathological responses of cavefish. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4:1416–1430. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1234-2
Pipoly I, Bokony V, Kirkpatrick M, Donald PF, Szekely T, Liker A (2015) The genetic sex-determination system predicts adult sex ratios in tetrapods. Nature 527:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15380
Puelles L, Martinez-de-la-Torre M, Martinez S, Watson C, Paxinos G (2018) The chick brain in stereotaxic coordinates and alternate stains. Academic Press, San Diego
Que P, Chang Y, Eberhart-Phillips L, Liu Y, Székely T, Zhang Z (2015) Low nest survival of a breeding shorebird in Bohai Bay, China. J Ornithol 156:297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1126-9
R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Radjavi A, Smirnov I, Kipnis J (2014) Brain antigen-reactive CD4+ T cells are sufficient to support learning behavior in mice with limited T cell repertoire. Brain Behav Immun 35:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2013.08.013
Rotllant G, Nguyen TV, Sbragaglia V, Rahi L, Dudley KJ, Hurwood D et al (2017) Sex and tissue specific gene expression patterns identified following de novo transcriptomic analysis of the Norway lobster. Nephrops Norvegicus BMC Genomics 18:622. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3981-2
Scalf CS, Chariker JH, Rouchka EC, Ashley NT (2019) Transcriptomic analysis of immune response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). BMC Genomics 20:647. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6016-3
Schwarz JM, Sholar PW, Bilbo SD (2012) Sex differences in microglial colonization of the developing rat brain. J Neurochem 120:948–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07630.x
Sharma E, Künstner A, Fraser BA, Zipprich G, Kottler VA, Henz SR et al (2014) Transcriptome assemblies for studying sex-biased gene expression in the guppy. Poecilia Reticulata BMC Genomics 15:400. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-400
Siani F, Greco R, Levandis G, Ghezzi C, Daviddi F, Demartini C et al (2017) Influence of estrogen modulation on glia activation in a murine model of Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurosci 11:306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00306
Sol D, Székely T, Liker A, Lefebvre L (2007) Big-brained birds survive better in nature. Proc R Soc B 274:763–769. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3765
Squarzoni P, Oller G, Hoeffel G, Pont-Lezica L, Rostaing P, Low D et al (2014) Microglia modulate wiring of the embryonic forebrain. Cell Rep 8:1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.042
Székely T (2019) Why study plovers? The significance of non-model organisms in avian ecology, behaviour and evolution. J Ornithol 160:923–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01669-4
Székely T, Kosztolányi A, Küpper C (2008) Practical guide for investigating breeding ecology of Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus. University of Bath v3 (Available online)
Székely T, Weissing FJ, Komdeur J (2014) Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution. J Evol Biol 27:1500–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12415
Tian L, Rauvala H, Gahmberg CG (2009) Neuronal regulation of immune responses in the central nervous system. Trends Immunol 30:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2008.11.002
Tieleman BI, Versteegh MA, Klasing KC, Williams JB (2019) Constitutive innate immunity of tropical House Wrens varies with season and reproductive activity. The Auk 136:ukz029. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukz029
Valdebenito JO, Halimubieke N, Lendvai ÁZ, Figuerola J, Eichhorn G, Székely T (2021) Seasonal variation in sex-specific immunity in wild birds. Sci Rep 11:1349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80030-9
Valdebenito JO, Martinez-de la Puente J, Castro M, Perez-Hurtado A, Tejera G, Szekely T et al (2020) Association of insularity and body condition to cloacal bacteria prevalence in a small shorebird. PLoS ONE 15:e0237369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237369
Videvall E, Cornwallis CK, Palinauskas V, Valkiunas G, Hellgren O (2015) The avian transcriptome response to malaria infection. Mol Biol Evol 32:1255–1267. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv016
Videvall E, Palinauskas V, Valkiūnas G, Hellgren O (2020) Host transcriptional responses to high- and low-virulent avian malaria parasites. Am Nat 195:1070–1084. https://doi.org/10.1086/708530
Villa A, Gelosa P, Castiglioni L, Cimino M, Rizzi N, Pepe G et al (2018) Sex-specific features of microglia from adult mice. Cell Rep 23:3501–3511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.048
Wang X, Maher KH, Zhang N, Que P, Zheng C, Liu S et al (2019a) Demographic histories and genome-wide patterns of divergence in incipient species of shorebirds. Frontiers in Genetics 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00919
Wang X, Que P, Heckel G, Hu J, Zhang X, Chiang CY et al (2019b) Genetic, phenotypic and ecological differentiation suggests incipient speciation in two Charadrius plovers along the Chinese coast. BMC Evol Biol 19:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1449-5
Wang Y, Guo J, Wang L, Tian H, Sui J (2019c) Transcriptome analysis revealed potential mechanisms of differences in physiological stress responses between caged male and female magpies. BMC Genomics 20:447. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5804-0
Watson H, Videvall E, Andersson MN, Isaksson C (2017) Transcriptome analysis of a wild bird reveals physiological responses to the urban environment. Sci Rep 7:44180. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44180
Wilson MA (2020) Searching for sex differences. Science 369:1298. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd8340
Yang X, Schadt E, Wang S, Wang H, Arnold A, Ingram-Drake L et al (2006) Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Res 16:995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5217506
Yun J, Yeo IJ, Hwang CJ, Choi D-Y, Im H-S, Kim JY et al (2018) Estrogen deficiency exacerbates Aβ-induced memory impairment through enhancement of neuroinflammation, amyloidogenesis and NF-ĸB activation in ovariectomized mice. Brain Behav Immun 73:282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.013
Zhan Y, Paolicelli RC, Sforazzini F, Weinhard L, Bolasco G, Pagani F et al (2014) Deficient neuron-microglia signaling results in impaired functional brain connectivity and social behavior. Nat Neurosci 17:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3641
Zhou Q, Zhang J, Bachtrog D, An N, Huang Q, Jarvis ED et al (2014) Complex evolutionary trajectories of sex chromosomes across bird taxa. Science 346:1246338. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246338
Acknowledgements
We thank Naerhulan Halimubieke, Xuejing Wang, Zhenhua Liu, and Mengjie Jin for their support during fieldwork, Chenqing Zheng for coordinating sample transportation and RNA sequencing, and Benjamin Padilla for helpful discussions.
Funding
Funding was provided by the Chilean National Agency for Research and Development (ANID, former CONICYT), BECAS CHILE 72170569 to JOV. KHM was supported by a NERC GW4 + studentship (NE/L002434/1) and a Korner Travelling Award. KHM, ZZ, YL, and AOU were supported by a British Council and Chinese Scholarship Council Newton Fund PhD Placement. The National Natural Science Foundation of China funded PQ and ZZ (No.31572288) and NKFIH-OTKA K116538 research grant to GZ and TS. GZ was also funded by the National Research Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (FK131966). The Raymond F. Schinazi International Exchange Program supported AOU, LJY, and TS. TS was also funded by the Royal Society (Wolfson Merit Award WM170050, APEX APX\R1\191045) and by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (ÉLVONAL KKP-126949, K-116310). Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowship (DH071902) and CONACyT Frontiers in Science grant (CF 2019-682142) funded AOU.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AU, TS, KHM, and YL designed the study. JOV wrote the manuscript and did the data analysis. KHM conducted the laboratory work and bioinformatics. GZ did the brain dissections. All authors contributed substantially to revisions of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Birds were sacrificed conforming to the regulations of ethical conditions by the Chinese Animal Welfare Act (20090606), and of the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body of the University of Bath and the Institutional Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of Sun Yat-sen University (2005DKA21403-JK).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Valdebenito, J.O., Maher, K.H., Zachár, G. et al. Sex differences in immune gene expression in the brain of a small shorebird. Immunogenetics 74, 487–496 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-022-01253-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-022-01253-w