Skip to main content
Log in

Antibiotic Activity Altered by Competitive Interactions Between Two Coral Reef–Associated Bacteria

  • Microbiology of Aquatic Systems
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbes produce natural products that mediate interactions with each other and with their environments, representing a potential source of antibiotics for human use. The biosynthesis of some antibiotics whose constitutive production otherwise remains low has been shown to be induced by competing microbes. Competition among macroorganism hosts may further influence the metabolic outputs of members of their microbiomes, especially near host surfaces where hosts and microbial symbionts come into close contact. At multiple field sites in Fiji, we collected matched samples of corals and algae that were freestanding or in physical contact with each other, cultivated bacteria from their surfaces, and explored growth-inhibitory activities of these bacteria against marine and human pathogens. In the course of the investigation, an interaction was discovered between two coral-associated actinomycetes in which an Agrococcus sp. interfered with the antibiotic output of a Streptomyces sp. Several diketopiperazines identified from the antibiotic-producing bacterium could not, on their own, account for the antibiotic activity indicating that other, as yet unidentified molecule(s) or molecular blends, possibly including diketopiperazines, are likely involved. This observation highlights the complex molecular dynamics at play among microbiome constituents. The mechanisms through which microbial interactions impact the biological activities of specialized metabolites deserve further attention considering the ecological and commercial importance of bacterial natural products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

16S sequences for the microbes used in this study have been deposited in GenBank (OK184772-OK184808). All other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files) unless otherwise noted. Microbial isolates are stored at the Georgia Institute of Technology and are available upon request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ghoul M, Mitri S (2016) The ecology and evolution of microbial competition. Trends Microbiol 24(10):833–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goh E-B, Yim G, Tsui W, McClure J, Surette MG, Davies J (2002) Transcriptional modulation of bacterial gene expression by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(26):17025. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252607699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies J (2013) Specialized microbial metabolites: functions and origins. J Antibiot 66(7):361–364. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2013.61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seyedsayamdost MR (2019) Toward a global picture of bacterial secondary metabolism, (in eng). J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 46(3–4):301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-019-02136-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Challis GL, Ravel J. Coelichelin, a new peptide siderophore encoded by the Streptomyces coelicolor genome: structure prediction from the sequence of its non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, (in eng), no. 0378–1097 (Print)

  6. Lautru S, Deeth RJ, Bailey LM, Challis GL. Discovery of a new peptide natural product by Streptomyces coelicolor genome mining, (in eng), no. 1552–4450 (Print)

  7. Ivanisevic J et al (2011) Biochemical trade-offs: evidence for ecologically linked secondary metabolism of the Sponge Oscarella balibaloi. PLoS ONE 6(11):e28059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdelmohsen UR, Grkovic T, Balasubramanian S, Kamel MS, Quinn RJ, Hentschel U (2015) Elicitation of secondary metabolism in actinomycetes. Biotechnol Adv 33(6):798–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.06.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cueto M, Jensen PR, Kauffman C, Fenical W, Lobkovsky E. Clardy J. Pestalone, a new antibiotic produced by a marine fungus in response to bacterial challenge, (in eng), no. 0163–3864 (Print)

  10. McManus JW, Meñez LAB, Kesner-Reyes KN, Vergara SG, Ablan MC (2000) Coral reef fishing and coral-algal phase shifts: implications for global reef status. ICES J Mar Sci 57(3):572–578. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429(6994):827–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasher DB, Hay ME (2010) Chemically rich seaweeds poison corals when not controlled by herbivores, (in eng). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(21):9683–9688. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912095107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasher DB, Stout EP, Engel S, Kubanek J, Hay ME (2011) Macroalgal terpenes function as allelopathic agents against reef corals, (in eng). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(43):17726–17731. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108628108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonaldo RM, Hay ME. Seaweed-coral interactions: variance in seaweed allelopathy, coral susceptibility, and potential effects on coral resilience, (in eng), no. 1932–6203 (Electronic)

  15. Shearer TL, Snell TW, Hay ME (2014) Gene expression of corals in response to macroalgal competitors. PLoS ONE 9(12):e114525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Haas AF et al (2016) Global microbialization of coral reefs. Nat Microbiol 1(6):16042. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson Jeremy BC et al (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293(5530):629–637. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gochfeld DJ, Aeby GS (2008) Antibacterial chemical defenses in Hawaiian corals provide possible protection from disease. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alagely A, Krediet CJ, Ritchie KB, Teplitski M. Signaling-mediated cross-talk modulates swarming and biofilm formation in a coral pathogen Serratia marcescens, (in eng), no. 1751–7370 (Electronic)

  20. Krediet CJ, Ritchie KB, Paul VJ, Teplitski M (2013) Coral-associated micro-organisms and their roles in promoting coral health and thwarting diseases, (in eng). Proc Biol Sci 280(1755):20122328–20122328. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Krediet CJ, Ritchie KB, Alagely A, Teplitski M (2013) Members of native coral microbiota inhibit glycosidases and thwart colonization of coral mucus by an opportunistic pathogen. ISME J 7(5):980–990. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kvennefors ECE, Sampayo E, Kerr C, Vieira G, Roff G, Barnes AC. Regulation of bacterial communities through antimicrobial activity by the coral holobiont, (in eng), no. 1432–184X (Electronic)

  23. Pham TM, Wiese J, Wenzel-Storjohann A, Imhoff JF (2016) Diversity and antimicrobial potential of bacterial isolates associated with the soft coral Alcyonium digitatum from the Baltic Sea. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 109(1):105–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-015-0613-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shnit-Orland M, Kushmaro A (2009) Coral mucus-associated bacteria: a possible first line of defense. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67(3):371–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Florez JZ, Camus C, Hengst MB, Buschmann AH (2017) A functional perspective analysis of macroalgae and epiphytic bacterial community interaction, (in eng). Front Microbiol 8:2561–2561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Manefield M et al (1999) Evidence that halogenated furanones from Delisea pulchra inhibit acylated homoserine lactone (AHL)-mediated gene expression by displacing the AHL signal from its receptor protein. Microbiology 145(2):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-145-2-283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nylund GM, Cervin G, Persson F, Hermansson M, Steinberg PD, Pavia H (2008) Seaweed defence against bacteria: a poly-brominated 2-heptanone from the red alga Bonnemaisonia hamifera inhibits bacterial colonisation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 369:39–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vega Thurber R et al (2012) Macroalgae decrease growth and alter microbial community structure of the reef-building coral, Porites astreoides. PLOS ONE 7(9):e44246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Morrow KM, Liles MR, Paul VJ, Moss A, Chadwick NE (2013) Bacterial shifts associated with coral–macroalgal competition in the Caribbean Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 488:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nugues MM, Smith GW, van Hooidonk RJ, Seabra MI, Bak RPM (2004) Algal contact as a trigger for coral disease. Ecol Lett 7(10):919–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00651.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith JE, Shaw M et al (2006) Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae-mediated, microbe-induced coral mortality, (in eng), no. 1461–0248 (Electronic)

  32. Pratte ZA, Longo GO, Burns AS, Hay ME, Stewart FJ (2018) Contact with turf algae alters the coral microbiome: contact versus systemic impacts. Coral Reefs 37(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-017-1615-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Barott KL et al (2006) Microbial to reef scale interactions between the reef-building coral Montastraea annularis and benthic algae, (in eng), no. 1471–2954 (Electronic)

  34. Yang JY et al (2012) Primer on agar-based microbial imaging mass spectrometry. J Bacteriol 194(22):6023–6028. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00823-12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Braña AF et al (2015) Two streptomyces species producing antibiotic, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory compounds are widespread among intertidal macroalgae and deep-sea coral reef invertebrates from the Central Cantabrian Sea. Microbial Ecol 69(3):512–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0508-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Karim MRU, Harunari E, Oku N, Akasaka K, Igarashi Y (2020) Bulbimidazoles A-C, antimicrobial and cytotoxic alkanoyl imidazoles from a marine gammaproteobacterium microbulbifer species. J Nat Prod 83(4):1295–1299. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hayasaka F, Yamamoto S, Sakai Y (2016) Production method for cyclic dipeptide derived from native collagen. Food Sci Technol Res 22:477–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. He R, Wang B, Wakimoto T, Wang M, Zhu L, Abe I (2013) Cyclodipeptides from metagenomic library of a japanese marine sponge. J Braz Chem Soc 24:1926–1932

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Adibi A, Rees ER, McCarley S, Sica VP, Oberlies NH (2017) Characterization and Isolation of Peptide Metabolites of an Antifungal Bacterial Isolate Identified as Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Subspecies plantarum Strain ZB42, vol. 6 (6), ed. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 1309–1313

  40. Alshaibani MM et al (2017) Isolation, purification, and characterization of five active diketopiperazine derivatives from endophytic streptomyces SUK 25 with antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities, vol. 27 (7), ed. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1249–1256

  41. de Carvalho MP, Abraham WR. Antimicrobial and biofilm inhibiting diketopiperazines, (in eng), no. 1875–533X (Electronic)

  42. Patin NV, Duncan KR, Dorrestein PC, Jensen PR (2016) Competitive strategies differentiate closely related species of marine actinobacteria. ISME J 10(2):478–490. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Modolon F, Barno AR, Villela HDM, Peixoto RS. Ecological and biotechnological importance of secondary metabolites produced by coral-associated bacteria, (in eng), no. 1365–2672 (Electronic)

  44. Stubbendieck RM, Straight PD (2016) Multifaceted interfaces of bacterial competition, (in eng). J Bacteriol 198(16):2145–2155. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00275-16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoefler BC, Gorzelnik KV, Yang JY, Hendricks N, Dorrestein PC, Straight PD (2012) Enzymatic resistance to the lipopeptide surfactin as identified through imaging mass spectrometry of bacterial competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(32):13082. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205586109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Perzborn M, Syldatk C, Rudat J (2013) Enzymatical and microbial degradation of cyclic dipeptides (diketopiperazines). AMB Express 3(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-3-51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Martins MB, Carvalho I (2007) Diketopiperazines: biological activity and synthesis. Tetrahedron 63(40):9923–9932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2007.04.105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zink KE, Ludvik DA, Lazzara PR, Moore TW, Mandel MJ, Sanchez LM. A small molecule coordinates symbiotic behaviors in a host organ. LID - https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03637-20 [doi] LID - e03637–20, (in eng), no. 2150–7511 (Electronic)

  49. Borgman P, Lopez RD, Lane AL (2019) The expanding spectrum of diketopiperazine natural product biosynthetic pathways containing cyclodipeptide synthases. Org Biomol Chem 17(9):2305–2314. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8OB03063D

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar SN, Siji JV, Nambisan B, Mohandas C (2012) Activity and synergistic antimicrobial activity between diketopiperazines against bacteria in vitro. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 168(8):2285–2296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9937-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Fijian Government for the permission to perform research in their territorial waters and for permission to export samples. We also thank the chief, Ratu Manasa Naikasowalu, and the village of Nacula, as well as the staff at the Oarsman Bay Lodge, for their support in making this collection expedition possible. Analytical support was provided by the Georgia Institute of Technology NMR Center and the Georgia Institute of Technology Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility. Vibrio coralliilyticus CN2 was provided by Dr. Mark Hay at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Funding

The project was funded by NIH U19 TW007401.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SJM, PJ, and JK conceived of and designed experiments. SJM, AD, SV, JG, KS, PJ, and JK contributed to fieldwork, microbial isolation efforts, and subsequent experiments. The manuscript was written by SJM and JK with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Kubanek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The research conducted here complied with the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES permit #17FJ/NV2000284) and abided by the legal agreement between the Georgia Institute of Technology, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, The University of the South Pacific, and the Fijian Government.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

All authors have reviewed the manuscript and consent to its publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 9858 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mascuch, S.J., Demko, A., Viulu, S. et al. Antibiotic Activity Altered by Competitive Interactions Between Two Coral Reef–Associated Bacteria. Microb Ecol 85, 1226–1235 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02016-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02016-6

Keywords

Navigation