Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging of the brainstem in children, part 1: imaging techniques, embryology, anatomy and review of congenital conditions

  • Review
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Part 1 of this series of two articles describes conventional and advanced MRI techniques that are useful for evaluating brainstem pathologies. In addition, it provides a review of the embryology, normal progression of myelination, and clinically and radiologically salient imaging anatomy of the normal brainstem. Finally, it discusses congenital diseases of the brainstem with a focus on distinctive imaging features that allow for differentiating pathologies. Part 2 of this series of two articles includes discussion of neoplasms; infections; and vascular, demyelinating, toxic and metabolic, and miscellaneous disease processes affecting the brainstem. The ultimate goal of this pair of articles is to empower the radiologist to add clinical value in the care of pediatric patients with brainstem pathologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oz G, Alger JR, Barker PB et al (2014) Clinical proton MR spectroscopy in central nervous system disorders. Radiology 270:658–679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu SS, Kim SJ, Kim HS et al (2014) Utility of proton MR spectroscopy for differentiating typical and atypical primary central nervous system lymphomas from tumefactive demyelinating lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:270–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitehead MT, Lee B, Gropman A (2016) Lesional perfusion abnormalities in Leigh disease demonstrated by arterial spin labeling correlate with disease activity. Pediatr Radiol 46:1309–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sclocco R, Beissner F, Bianciardi M et al (2018) Challenges and opportunities for brainstem neuroimaging with ultrahigh field MRI. Neuroimage 168:412–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kline-Fath B (2015) Fundamental and advanced fetal imaging ultrasound and MRI. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cochard L, Netter F (2002) Netter's atlas of human embryology. Icon Learning Systems, Teterboro

    Google Scholar 

  7. Angeles Fernandez-Gil M, Palacios-Bote R, Leo-Barahona M et al (2010) Anatomy of the brainstem: a gaze into the stem of life. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 31:196–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barkovich AJ, Millen KJ, Dobyns WB (2009) A developmental and genetic classification for midbrain–hindbrain malformations. Brain 132:3199–3230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Barkovich A, Raybaud C (2012) Congenital malformations of the brain and skull. In: Barkovich A, Raybaud C (eds) Pediatric neuroimaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 367–568

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jissendi-Tchofo P, Severino M, Nguema-Edzang B et al (2015) Update on neuroimaging phenotypes of mid-hindbrain malformations. Neuroradiology 57:113–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lumsden A, Krumlauf R (1996) Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274:1109–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoch MJ, Bruno MT, Faustin A et al (2019) 3T MRI whole-brain microscopy discrimination of subcortical anatomy, part 2: basal forebrain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:1095–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Querol-Pascual MR (2010) Clinical approach to brainstem lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 31:220–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doherty D, Millen KJ, Barkovich AJ (2013) Midbrain and hindbrain malformations: advances in clinical diagnosis, imaging, and genetics. Lancet Neurol 12:381–393

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jandeaux C, Kuchcinski G, Ternynck C et al (2019) Biometry of the cerebellar vermis and brain stem in children: MR imaging reference data from measurements in 718 children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:1835–1841

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruchalski K, Hathout GM (2012) A medley of midbrain maladies: a brief review of midbrain anatomy and syndromology for radiologists. Radiol Res Pract 2012:258524

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Snell RS (2001) Clinical neuroanatomy for medical students. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Waxman SG (2017) Clinical neuroanatomy. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin JH (2003) Neuroanatomy: text and atlas. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martin E, Krassnitzer S, Kaelin P et al (1991) MR imaging of the brainstem: normal postnatal development. Neuroradiology 33:391–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hittmair K, Kramer J, Rand T et al (1996) Infratentorial brain maturation: a comparison of MRI at 0.5 and 1.5T. Neuroradiology 38:360–366

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adams BW, Saunders D, Currie S et al (2017) “Kinks and clefts”: a review of congenital brain stem abnormalities. Neurographics 7:477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moog U, Dobyns WB (2018) An update on oculocerebrocutaneous (Delleman-Oorthuys) syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 178:414–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudaks LI, Patel S, Barnett CP (2012) Novel clinical features in pontine tegmental cap dysplasia. Pediatr Neurol 46:393–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adeloye A (1976) Mesencephalic spur (beaking deformity of the tectum) in Arnold-Chiari malformation. J Neurosurg 45:315–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tubbs RS, Soleau S, Custis J et al (2004) Degree of tectal beaking correlates to the presence of nystagmus in children with Chiari II malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 20:459–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Severino M, Tortora D, Pistorio A et al (2016) Expanding the spectrum of congenital anomalies of the diencephalic–mesencephalic junction. Neuroradiology 58:33–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Severino M, Righini A, Tortora D et al (2017) MR imaging diagnosis of diencephalic–mesencephalic junction dysplasia in fetuses with developmental ventriculomegaly. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1643–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Poretti A, Boltshauser E, Huisman TA (2016) Cerebellar and brainstem malformations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 26:341–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Dijk T, Baas F, Barth PG, Poll-The BT (2018) What's new in pontocerebellar hypoplasia? An update on genes and subtypes. Orphanet J Rare Dis 13:92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bosemani T, Orman G, Boltshauser E et al (2015) Congenital abnormalities of the posterior fossa. Radiographics 35:200–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Namavar Y, Barth PG, Kasher PR et al (2011) Clinical, neuroradiological and genetic findings in pontocerebellar hypoplasia. Brain 134:143–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Poretti A, Huisman TA, Scheer I et al (2011) Joubert syndrome and related disorders: spectrum of neuroimaging findings in 75 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1459–1463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Namavar Y, Barth PG, Poll-The BT et al (2011) Classification, diagnosis and potential mechanisms in pontocerebellar hypoplasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 6:50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Fujii Y, Aida N, Niwa T et al (2017) A small pons as a characteristic finding in down syndrome: a quantitative MRI study. Brain and Development 39:298–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brancati F, Dallapiccola B, Valente EM (2010) Joubert syndrome and related disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis 5:20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Briguglio M, Pinelli L, Giordano L et al (2011) Pontine tegmental cap dysplasia: developmental and cognitive outcome in three adolescent patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 6:36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jissendi-Tchofo P, Doherty D, McGillivray G et al (2009) Pontine tegmental cap dysplasia: MR imaging and diffusion tensor imaging features of impaired axonal navigation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson AJ, Ederies MA (2016) Diagnostic imaging of posterior fossa anomalies in the fetus. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 21:312–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stroustrup Smith A, Levine D, Barnes PD, Robertson RL (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the kinked fetal brain stem: a sign of severe dysgenesis. J Ultrasound Med 24:1697–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Duffield C, Jocson J, Wootton-Gorges SL (2009) Brainstem disconnection. Pediatr Radiol 39:1357–1360

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Pruthi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CME activity

This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit the SPR website at www.pedrad.org on the Education page and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarma, A., Heck, J.M., Ndolo, J. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brainstem in children, part 1: imaging techniques, embryology, anatomy and review of congenital conditions. Pediatr Radiol 51, 172–188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04953-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04953-1

Keywords

Navigation