Skip to main content
Log in

Prenatal imaging of anorectal malformations — 10-year experience at a tertiary center in Switzerland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anorectal malformation is a spectrum of congenital defects of the distal bowel, mostly diagnosed at birth.

Objective

To describe the prenatal imaging findings of anorectal malformations, explore the causes of the low rates of prenatal diagnosis, compare the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonnance imaging [MRI] and evaluate the relevance of information obtained at MRI.

Materials and methods

Children treated for anorectal malformation at our hospital and with available prenatal studies were retrospectively identified and included in the study. We reviewed prenatal imaging exams, listed findings suggestive of the diagnosis, and compared results with the final classification.

Results

Fourteen fetuses and neonates — eight with intermediate–high type anorectal malformation and six with cloacae — fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All had associated congenital anomalies. Prenatal exams included 13 US and 8 MRI exams, with 7 children having both exams. Suggestive findings for anorectal malformation were detected in 50% of the cases prenatally and in 85% upon review. They were prospectively detected in 31% and 50% of the cases at US and MRI and retrospectively in 62% and 100% at US and MRI, respectively. MRI was superior to US because it improved the diagnosis, especially in cloacae, and provided relevant additional information that changed management in two cases.

Conclusion

The most important signs suggesting anorectal malformation are an absent target sign and anomalous distal bowel wall and rectal fluid. Complementary prenatal MRI improves the diagnosis of anorectal malformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levitt MA, Pena A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:33

  2. Alamo L, Meyrat BJ, Meuwly JY et al (2013) Anorectal malformations: finding the pathway out of the labyrinth. Radiographics 33:491–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B et al (2007) Associated malformations in patients with anorectal anomalies. Eur J Med Genet 50:281–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levitt MA, Pena A (2005) Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr 17:394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee MY, Won HS, Shim JY et al (2016) Sonographic determination of type in a fetal imperforate anus. J Ultrasound Med 35:1285–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brantberg A, Blaas HGK, Haugen SE et al (2006) Imperforate anus: a relatively common anomaly rarely diagnosed prenatally. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:904–910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Lim FY et al (2010) Prenatal diagnosis of cloacal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 26:1071–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Perlman S, Bilik R, Leibovitch L et al (2014) More than a gut feeling — sonographic prenatal diagnosis of imperforate anus in a high-risk population. Prenat Diagn 34:1307–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vijayaraghavan SB, Prema AS, Suganyadevi P (2011) Sonographic depiction of the fetal anus and its utility in the diagnosis of anorectal malformations. J Ultrasound Med 30:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ochoa JH, Chiesa M, Vildoza RP et al (2012) Evaluation of the perineal muscular complex in the prenatal diagnosis of anorectal atresia in a high-risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:521–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Su YM, Lin Y, Chen SQ et al (2018) Prenatal evaluation for detection of anorectal atresia: value of ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 38:1501–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallmann MR, Reutter H, Gottschalk I et al (2019) Prenatal diagnosis of enterolithiasis in 20 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 15:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Livingston JC, Elicevik M, Breech L et al (2012) Persistent cloaca, a 10-year review of prenatal diagnosis. J Ultasound Med 31:403–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bach-Segura P, Droullé P (2008) Fetal digestive tract imaging. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36:950–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Veyrac C, Couture A, Saguintaah BC Baud C (2004) MRI of fœtal GI tract abnormalities. Abdom Imaging 29:411–420

  16. Capito C, Belarbi N, Paye Jaouen A et al (2014) Prenatal pelvic MRI: additional clues for assessment of urogenital obstructive anomalies. J Pediatr Urol 10:162–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peiro JL, Scorletti F, Sbragia L (2016) Prenatal diagnosis of cloacal malformation. Semin Pediatr Surg 25:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Calvo-Garcia MA, Kline-Fath BM, Levitt MA et al (2011) Fetal MRI clues to diagnose cloacal malformations. Pediatr Radiol 41:1117–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Winkler NS, Kennedy AM, Woodward PJ (2012) Cloacal malformation: embryology, anatomy and prenatal imaging features. J Ultrasound Med 31:1843–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dannull K, Sung J (2014) Cloacal dysgenesis diagnosis by prenatal ultrasound and MRI. Pediatr Radiol 44:230–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bronshtein M, Gover A, Beloosesky R et al (2017) Transient distension of right posterior located sigma, a new sonographic sign for the prenatal diagnosis of anal atresia. J Clin Ultrasound 45:160–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Warne S, Chitty LS, Wilcox DT (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of cloacal anomalies. BJU Int 89:78–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mallmann MR, Reutter H, Mack-Detlefsen B et al (2019) Prenatal diagnosis of hydro(metro)colpos: a series of 20 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 45:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Swiss Society for Ultrasound in Medicine, Obstetrical and Gynecology section (2011) Recommandations pour les examens échographiques en cours de grossesse, 3ème version [Recommendations for prenatal ultrasound assessment]. Bern, Switzerland

  25. Holschneider A, Hutson J, Pena A et al (2005) Preliminary report on the international conference for the development of standards for the treatment of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40:1521–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moon MH, Cho JY, Kim JH et al (2010) In-utero development of the fetal anal sphincter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:556–559

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lysiane Rohrer.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rohrer, L., Vial, Y., Gengler, C. et al. Prenatal imaging of anorectal malformations — 10-year experience at a tertiary center in Switzerland. Pediatr Radiol 50, 57–67 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04513-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04513-2

Keywords

Navigation