Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Daily Readiness Huddle: a process to rapidly identify issues and foster improvement through problem-solving accountability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Because of the increasing complexities of providing imaging for pediatric health care services, a more reliable process to manage the daily delivery of care is necessary. Objective We describe our Daily Readiness Huddle and the effects of the process on problem identification and improvement.

Materials and methods

Our Daily Readiness Huddle has four elements: metrics review, clinical volume review, daily readiness assessment, and problem accountability. It is attended by radiologists, directors, managers, front-line staff with concerns, representatives from support services (information technology [IT] and biomedical engineering [biomed]), and representatives who join the meeting in a virtual format from off-site locations. Data are visually displayed on erasable whiteboards. The daily readiness assessment uses queues to determine whether anyone has concerns or outlier data in regard to S-MESA (Safety, Methods, Equipment, Supplies or Associates). Through this assessment, problems are identified and categorized as quick hits (will be resolved in 24–48 h, not requiring project management) and complex issues. Complex issues are assigned an owner, quality coach and report-back date. Additionally, projects are defined as improvements that are often strategic, are anticipated to take more than 60 days, and do not necessarily arise out of identified issues during the Daily Readiness Huddle. We tracked and calculated the mean, median and range of days to resolution and completion for complex issues and for projects during the first full year of implementing this process.

Results

During the first 12 months, 91 complex issues were identified and resolved, 11 projects were in progress and 33 completed, with 23 other projects active or in planning. Time to resolution of complex issues (in days) was mean 37.5, median 34.0, and range 1–105. For projects, time to completion (in days) was mean 86.0, median 84.0, and range 5–280.

Conclusion

The Daily Readiness Huddle process has given us a framework to rapidly identify issues, bring accountability to problem-solving, and foster improvement. It has also had a positive effect on team-building and coordination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wachter R (2015) The digital doctor: hope, hype, and harm at the dawn of medicine’s computer age. McGraw Hill Professional, New York, pp 1–243

    Google Scholar 

  2. Donnelly LF (2014) Daily management systems in medicine. Radiographics 44:1209–1212

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donnelly LF (2016) The Daily Readiness Huddle? A key component to a system of care. J Health Syst Pol Res 3:22.1–22.7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mann D (2010) Creating a lean culture — tools to sustain lean conversions, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–103

  5. Liker JK, Convis GL (2012) The Toyota way to lean leadership — achieving and sustaining excellence through leadership development. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 121–143

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koenigsaecker G (2009) Leading the lean enterprise transformation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 9–77

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way. 14 management principles form the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 1–159

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bussell J (2012) Anatomy of a lean leader as illustrated by 10 modern CEOs and Abraham Lincoln. UL LLC, Northbrook, pp 1–150

    Google Scholar 

  9. Toussaint J, Gerard RA (2010) On the mend. Revolutionizing healthcare to save lives and transform the industry. Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge, pp 1–138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70:71–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zelman WN, Pink GH, Matthias CB (2003) Use of a balanced scorecard in health care. J Health Care Finance 29:1–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Donnelly LF, Gessner KE, Dickerson JM et al (2010) Department scorecard — a tool to help drive imaging delivery performance. Radiographics 30:2029–2038

  13. Johnson CD, Krecke KN, Miranda R et al (2009) Developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer. Radiographics 29:951–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Suite 470, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Lane F. Donnelly, Shirley S. Cherian, Kimberly B. Chua, Sam Thankachan, Laura A. Millecker, Alex G. Koroll & George S. Bisset III

Authors
  1. Lane F. Donnelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shirley S. Cherian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kimberly B. Chua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sam Thankachan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laura A. Millecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alex G. Koroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. George S. Bisset III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lane F. Donnelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donnelly, L.F., Cherian, S.S., Chua, K.B. et al. The Daily Readiness Huddle: a process to rapidly identify issues and foster improvement through problem-solving accountability. Pediatr Radiol 47, 22–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3712-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3712-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation