Skip to main content
Log in

Relapse surveillance in AFP-positive hepatoblastoma: re-evaluating the role of imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Children with hepatoblastoma routinely undergo repetitive surveillance imaging, with CT scans for several years after therapy, increasing the risk of radiation-induced cancer.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of surveillance CT scans compared to serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for the detection of hepatoblastoma relapse.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective study of all children diagnosed with AFP-positive hepatoblastoma from 2001 to 2011 at a single institution.

Results

Twenty-six children with hepatoblastoma were identified, with a mean age at diagnosis of 2 years 4 months (range 3 months to 11 years). Mean AFP level at diagnosis was 132,732 ng/ml (range 172.8–572,613 ng/ml). Five of the 26 children had hepatoblastoma relapse. A total of 105 imaging exams were performed following completion of therapy; 88 (84%) CT, 8 (8%) MRI, 5 (5%) US and 4 (4%) FDG PET/CT exams. A total of 288 alpha-fetoprotein levels were drawn, with a mean of 11 per child. The AFP level was elevated in all recurrences and no relapses were detected by imaging before AFP elevation. Two false-positive AFP levels and 15 false-positive imaging exams were detected. AFP elevation was found to be significantly more specific than PET/CT and CT imaging at detecting relapse.

Conclusion

We recommend using serial serum AFP levels as the preferred method of surveillance in children with AFP-positive hepatoblastoma, reserving imaging for the early postoperative period, for children at high risk of relapse, and for determination of the anatomical site of clinically suspected recurrence. Given the small size of this preliminary study, validation in a larger patient population is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Honeyman JN, La Quaglia MP (2012) Malignant liver tumors. Semin Pediatr Surg 21:245–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyers RL (2007) Tumors of the liver in children. Surg Oncol 16:195–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Ioris M, Brugieres L, Zimmermann A et al (2008) Hepatoblastoma with a low serum alpha-fetoprotein level at diagnosis: the SIOPEL group experience. Eur J Cancer 44:545–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Semraro M, Branchereau S, Maibach R et al (2013) Relapses in hepatoblastoma patients: clinical characteristics and outcome — experience of the International Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group (SIOPEL). Eur J Cancer 49:915–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Armenian SH, Landier W, Hudson MM et al (2013) Children’s Oncology Group’s 2013 blueprint for research: survivorship and outcomes. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:1063–1068

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Malogolowkin MH, Katzenstein HM, Krailo M et al (2008) Redefining the role of doxorubicin for the treatment of children with hepatoblastoma. J Clin Oncol 26:2379–2383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perilongo G, Maibach R, Shafford E et al (2009) Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus doxorubicin for standard-risk hepatoblastoma. N Engl J Med 361:1662–1670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCarville MB, Kao SC (2006) Imaging recommendations for malignant liver neoplasms in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 46:2–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Malogolowkin M, Katzenstein HM, Krailo M et al (2006) Intensified platinum therapy is an ineffective strategy for improving outcome in pediatric patients with advanced hepatoblastoma. J Clin Oncol 24:2879‐2884

  11. Rathore N, Eissa HM, Margolin JF et al (2012) Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: are we over-scanning our patients? Pediatr Hematol Oncol 29:415–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed BA, Connolly BL, Shroff P et al (2010) Cumulative effective doses from radiologic procedures for pediatric oncology patients. Pediatrics 126:e851–e858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfand MJ, Lemen LC (2007) PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager. Semin Nucl Med 37:391–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith MA, Seibel NL, Altekruse SF et al (2010) Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century. J Clin Oncol 28:2625–2634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kan JH, Hwang M, Lowas SR et al (2011) Impact of pelvic CT on staging, surveillance, and survival of pediatric patients with Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W515–W518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38:265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Voss SD, Chen L, Constine LS et al (2012) Surveillance computed tomography imaging and detection of relapse in intermediate- and advanced-stage pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 30:2635–2640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chong AL, Grant RM, Ahmed BA et al (2010) Imaging in pediatric patients: time to think again about surveillance. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55:407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Trobaugh-Lotrario AD, Tomlinson GE, Finegold MJ et al (2009) Small cell undifferentiated variant of hepatoblastoma: adverse clinical and molecular features similar to rhabdoid tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52:328–334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cruz RJ Jr, Ranganathan S, Mazariegos G et al (2013) Analysis of national and single-center incidence and survival after liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma: new trends and future opportunities. Surgery 153:150–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick A. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rojas, Y., Guillerman, R.P., Zhang, W. et al. Relapse surveillance in AFP-positive hepatoblastoma: re-evaluating the role of imaging. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1275–1280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3000-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3000-6

Keywords

Navigation