Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improvement in Palivizumab Administration Prior to Discharge for Hospitalized Infants with Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease: A Quality Improvement Initiative

  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this quality improvement initiative, we aimed to increase provider adherence with palivizumab administration guidelines for hospitalized infants with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. We included 470 infants over four respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons from 11/2017 to 03/2021 (baseline season: 11/2017–03/2018). Interventions included the following: education, including palivizumab in the sign-out template, identifying a pharmacy expert, and a text alert (seasons 1 and 2: 11/2018–03/2020) that was replaced by an electronic health record (EHR) best practice alert (BPA) in season 3 (11/2020–03/2021). The text alert and BPA prompted providers to add “Need for RSV immunoprophylaxis” to the EHR problem list. The outcome metric was the percentage of eligible patients administered palivizumab prior to discharge. The process metric was the percentage of eligible patients with “Need for RSV immunoprophylaxis” on the EHR problem list. The balancing metric was the percentage of palivizumab doses administered to ineligible patients. A statistical process control P-chart was used to analyze the outcome metric. The mean percentage of eligible patients who received palivizumab prior to hospital discharge increased significantly from 70.1% (82/117) to 90.0% (86/96) in season 1 and to 97.9% (140/143) in season 3. Palivizumab guideline adherence was as high or higher for those with “Need for RSV immunoprophylaxis” on the problem list than for those without it in most time periods. The percentage of inappropriate palivizumab doses decreased from 5.7% (n = 5) at baseline to 4.4% (n = 4) in season 1 and 0.0% (n = 0) in season 3. Through this initiative, we improved adherence with palivizumab administration guidelines for eligible infants prior to hospital discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

© 2021 Epic Systems Corporation

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAP:

American Academy of Pediatrics

BPA:

Best Practice Alert

CCU:

Cardiac Care Unit

CHOP:

Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

EHR:

Electronic health record

QI:

Quality improvement

RSV:

Respiratory syncytial virus

SPC:

Statistical process control

References

  1. Shi T et al (2021) Risk factors for RSV associated acute lower respiratory infection poor outcome and mortality in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 226:S10–S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall CB et al (2009) The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med 360(6):588–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Resch B, Michel-Behnke I (2013) Respiratory syncytial virus infections in infants and children with congenital heart disease: update on the evidence of prevention with palivizumab. Curr Opin Cardiol 28(2):85–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon A et al (2007) Respiratory syncytial virus infection in 406 hospitalized premature infants: results from a prospective German multicentre database. Eur J Pediatr 166(12):1273–1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wegzyn C et al (2014) Safety and effectiveness of palivizumab in children at high risk of serious disease due to respiratory syncytial virus infection: a systematic review. Infect Dis Ther 3(2):133–158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Andabaka T et al (2013) Monoclonal antibody for reducing the risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(4):CD006602

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious, D. and C. American Academy of Pediatrics Bronchiolitis Guidelines (2014) Updated guidance for palivizumab prophylaxis among infants and young children at increased risk of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatrics 134(2):415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frogel MP et al (2010) A systematic review of compliance with palivizumab administration for RSV immunoprophylaxis. J Manag Care Pharm 16(1):46–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frogel M et al (2008) Improved outcomes with home-based administration of palivizumab: results from the 2000–2004 Palivizumab Outcomes Registry. Pediatr Infect Dis J 27(10):870–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rida NM, Tribble A, Klein KC (2019) Implementation of a palivizumab order panel to decrease inappropriate use. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 24(1):58–60

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Utidjian LH et al (2015) Clinical decision support and palivizumab: a means to protect from respiratory syncytial virus. Appl Clin Inform 6(4):769–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chow JW et al (2017) Improving palivizumab compliance rough a pharmacist-managed RSV prevention clinic. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 22(5):338–343

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Weaver KL et al (2020) Evaluation of appropriateness and cost savings of pharmacist-driven palivizumab ordering. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 25(7):636–641

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rostas SE, McPherson C (2016) Pharmacist-driven respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis stewardship service in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Health Syst Pharm 73(24):2089–2094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zembles TN et al (2016) Implementation of American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for palivizumab prophylaxis in a pediatric hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm 73(6):405–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sel K et al (2020) Palivizumab compliance in congenital heart disease patients: factors related to compliance and altered lower respiratory tract infection viruses after palivizumab prophylaxis. Cardiol Young 30(6):818–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohammed MHA et al (2021) Palivizumab prophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients younger than 2 years of age with congenital heart disease. Ann Saudi Med 41(1):31–35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson LS (1984) The Shewhart control chart—tests for special causes. J Qual Technol 16(4):237–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson KS et al (2009) Compliance with RSV prophylaxis: Global physicians’ perspectives. Patient Prefer Adherence 3:195–203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mrosak J et al (2021) The influence of integrating clinical practice guideline order bundles into a general admission order set on guideline adoption. JAMIA Open 4(4):ooab087

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwan JL et al (2020) Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 370:m3216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kristin McNaughton, MHS, for editing assistance, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. No conflicts of interest to report. Kyle Winser for statistical assistance, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. No conflicts of interest to report.

Funding

Dr. Andrea L. Jones was supported by T32-HL007915.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by ALJ and MJC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ALJ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea L. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This Quality Improvement Initiative was reviewed and determined to not meet the criteria for human subjects’ research by the CHOP Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (TIF 177 KB)

Example text message alert to fellow physician regarding possible palivizumab eligibility.

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, A.L., Campbell, M.J., Abernathy, B. et al. Improvement in Palivizumab Administration Prior to Discharge for Hospitalized Infants with Hemodynamically Significant Congenital Heart Disease: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Pediatr Cardiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03163-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03163-4

Keywords

Navigation