Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Practice Patterns in the Management of Pressure Restrictive Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects: A Multinational Survey

  • Research
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indications for the closure of pressure restrictive perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD) are not well established in the pediatric population. We sought to assess practice variability among pediatric cardiologists in the United States (US), Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. A survey ascertaining practice patterns, including case vignettes with incremental progression of disease severity, was designed and administered through representative professional cardiac organizations and email listservs in the designated countries. Among the 299 respondents, 209 (70.0%) were from the US, 65 (21.7%) were from Canada and 25 (8.3%) were from Australia and New Zealand. Indications for pressure restrictive pmVSD closure included the presence of left ventricular (LV) dilation for 81.6% (244/299) (defined as z-score ≥ 2 for 59.0% (144/244) and ≥ 3 for 40.2% (98/244)) and significant pulmonary-systemic flow ratio (QP:QS) for 71.2% (213/299) [defined as ≥ 1.5:1 for 36.2% (77/213) and ≥ 2 for 62% (132/213)]. US pediatric cardiologists elected to close restrictive pmVSD at lower LV z-score and QP:QS ratio cut-offs (p-value 0.0002 and 0.013, respectively). In a case vignette, 63.6% (173/272) chose to intervene if there was right coronary cusp prolapse with stable mild aortic regurgitation. Of the remaining cardiologists, 93% (92/99) intervened if the aortic regurgitation was progressive (from trivial to mild). Commonly identified indications with variable thresholds for closure of pressure restrictive pmVSDs included the presence or progression of LV dilation, significant volume loading, and aortic valve prolapse with regurgitation. US pediatric cardiologists may have a lower threshold for pmVSD closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu Y, Chen S, Zühlke L, Black GC, Choy MK, Li N, Keavney BD (2019) Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970–2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. Int J Epidemiol 48(2):455–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lopez L, Houyel L, Colan SD, Anderson RH, Béland MJ, Aiello VD, Bailliard F, Cohen MS, Jacobs JP, Kurosawa H, Sanders SP, Walters HL 3rd, Weinberg PM, Boris JR, Cook AC, Crucean A, Everett AD, Gaynor JW, Giroud J, Guleserian KJ et al (2018) Classification of ventricular septal defects for the eleventh iteration of the international classification of diseases-striving for consensus: a report from the international society for nomenclature of paediatric and congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 106(5):1578–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Köhler S, Carmody L, Vasilevsky N, Jacobsen JOB, Danis D, Gourdine JP, Gargano M, Harris NL, Matentzoglu N, McMurry JA, Osumi-Sutherland D, Cipriani V, Balhoff JP, Conlin T, Blau H, Baynam G, Palmer R, Gratian D, Dawkins H, Segal M, Jansen AC, Muaz A, Chang WH, Bergerson J, Laulederkind SJF, Yüksel Z, Beltran S, Freeman AF, Sergouniotis PI, Durkin D, Storm AL, Hanauer M, Brudno M, Bello SM, Sincan M, Rageth K, Wheeler MT, Oegema R, Lourghi H, Della Rocca MG, Thompson R, Castellanos F, Priest J, Cunningham-Rundles C, Hegde A, Lovering RC, Hajek C, Olry A, Notarangelo L, Similuk M, Zhang XA, Gómez-Andrés D, Lochmüller H, Dollfus H, Rosenzweig S, Marwaha S, Rath A, Sullivan K, Smith C, Milner JD, Leroux D, Boerkoel CF, Klion A, Carter MC, Groza T, Smedley D, Haendel MA, Mungall C, Robinson PN (2019) Expansion of the human phenotype ontology (HPO) knowledge base and resources. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1):D1018–D1027. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantinotti M, Assanta N, Murzi B, Lopez L (2014) Controversies in the definition and management of insignificant left-to-right shunts. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 100(3):200–205. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haddad RN, Daou LS, Saliba ZS (2020) Percutaneous closure of restrictive-type perimembranous ventricular septal defect using the new KONAR multifunctional occluder: midterm outcomes of the first middle-eastern experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 96(3):E295–E302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxena A, Relan J, Agarwal R, Awasthy N, Azad S, Chakrabarty M, Dagar KS, Devagourou V, Dharan BS, Gupta SK, Iyer KS, Jayranganath M, Joshi R, Kannan B, Katewa A, Kohli V, Kothari SS, Krishnamoorthy KM, Kulkarni S, Kumar RM et al (2019) Indian guidelines for indications and timing of intervention for common congenital heart diseases: revised and updated consensus statement of the Working group on management of congenital heart diseases. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 12(3):254–286. https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.APC_32_19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabriel HM, Heger M, Innerhofer P, Zehetgruber M, Mundigler G, Wimmer M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2002) Long-term outcome of patients with ventricular septal defect considered not to require surgical closure during childhood. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(6):1066–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01706-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Backer CL, Winters RC, Zales VR, Takami H, Muster AJ, Benson DW Jr, Mavroudis C (1993) Restrictive ventricular septal defect: how small is too small to close? Ann Thorac Surg 56(5):1014–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)90006-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Q, Wu WX, Huang JS, Chen LW, Fang GH (2021) Transthoracic device closure, transcatheter device closure, and surgical repair via right submammary thoracotomy for restrictive ventricular septal defect, a respective comparative study. J Investig Surg 34(4):467–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1645247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong ZN, Chen Q, Huang LQ, Cao H (2019) A meta-analysis of perventricular device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. J Cardiothorac Surg 14(1):119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0936-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinman CS, Tabibian M, Starc TJ, Hsu DT, Gersony WM (2007) Spontaneous regression of left ventricular dilation in children with restrictive ventricular septal defects. J Pediatr 150(6):583–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckerström F, Rex CE, Maagaard M, Heiberg J, Rubak S, Redington A, Hjortdal VE (2020) Cardiopulmonary dysfunction in adults with a small, unrepaired ventricular septal defect: a long-term follow-up. Int J Cardiol 306:168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckerström F, Maagaard M, Boutrup N, Hjortdal VE (2020) Pulmonary function in older patients with ventricular septal defect. Am J Cardiol 125(11):1710–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karonis T, Scognamiglio G, Babu-Narayan SV, Montanaro C, Uebing A, Diller GP, Alonso-Gonzalez R, Swan L, Dimopoulos K, Gatzoulis MA, Li W (2016) Clinical course and potential complications of small ventricular septal defects in adulthood: late development of left ventricular dysfunction justifies lifelong care. Int J Cardiol 208:102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lyu H, Xu T, Brotman D, Mayer-Blackwell B, Cooper M, Daniel M, Wick EC, Saini V, Brownlee S, Makary MA (2017) Overtreatment in the United States. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0181970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jatoi I, Sah S (2019) Clinical practice guidelines and the overuse of health care services: need for reform. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 191(11):E297–E298. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ridic G, Gleason S, Ridic O (2012) Comparisons of health care systems in the United States, Germany and Canada. Mater Sociomed 24(2):112–120. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2012.24.112-120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shahanavaz S, Winlaw DS, Opotowsky AR (2022) What is blocking transcatheter ventricular septal defect closure? J Am Heart Assoc 11(7):e024963. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.024963

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Santhanam H, Yang L, Chen Z, Tai BC, Rajgor DD, Quek SC (2018) A meta-analysis of transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. Int J Cardiol 254:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Viswanathan S, Kumar RK (2017) Should we close small ventricular septal defects? Ann Pediatr Cardiol 10(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.197054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, Samuel S, Ghali WA, Sykes LL, Jetté N (2015) Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research team would like to thank the AAP SOCCS, the CPCA, the CSANZ, and PediHeartNet for distributing the survey on behalf of the research team to their members. Mr. Jesse Batara and Dr. Maryna Yaskina from the Women and Children's Health Research Institute (WCHRI) at University of Alberta provided statistical support for this project. The project data was collected and managed using REDCap hosted and supported by WCHRI and the research was funded by the generous support of the Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation through WCHRI.

Funding

There is no financial interest to report. The project was partially funded by the Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation through the Pediatrics Resident/Clinical Fellow Trainee Research Grant from the Women and Children's Health Research Institute at University of Alberta. The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Research Ethics Office at the University of Alberta (ID: Pro00108186).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK and KM conceived the presented idea. Under supervision of MK, AA reviewed the literature, designed the survey, collected the data and wrote the initial manuscript. RD, AM, CS, KA, KM and MK provided critical feedback and helped shape the research idea, the survey, analysis and manuscript. All authors participated in this work and reviewed and agreed with the content of this article. All authors meet criteria for authorship and have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Khoury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alkanhal, A., Ducas, R., Mackie, A.S. et al. Practice Patterns in the Management of Pressure Restrictive Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects: A Multinational Survey. Pediatr Cardiol 44, 845–854 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-03073-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-03073-x

Keywords

Navigation