Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applying Practice Analysis to Develop a New Test Content Outline for the Pediatric Cardiology Certification Examination

  • Research
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolving breadth and complexity of the contemporary pediatric cardiology specialty requires regular, systematic analysis of the practice to ensure that training and certification requirements address the demands of real-world clinical experience. We report the process of the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) for conducting such a practice analysis and revising the test content outline (TCO) for the pediatric cardiology subspecialty certification exam. A panel of 15 pediatric cardiologists conducted seven 2-h virtual meetings, during which they identified 37 unique tasks that represent the work a pediatric cardiologist may reasonably expect to perform within the first 5 years after training. These tasks were grouped into nine performance domains, similar to the entrustable professional activities (EPA), previously endorsed by the ABP in collaboration with the pediatric cardiology education community, and which represent the critical activities of the profession. The panel then enumerated the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to perform each task. These deliberations resulted in two work products: a practice analysis document (PAD) and subspecialty board TCO based on testable knowledge, skills, and abilities. Survey assessments of the panel’s work were then distributed to pediatric cardiology fellowship program directors and to practicing pediatric cardiologists for their input, which largely aligned with the panel’s recommendations. Survey responses were considered in the final revisions of the PAD and TCO. This approach to practice analysis proved to be an efficient process for describing the work performed by today’s pediatric cardiologists and the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to competently perform that work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABP:

American board of pediatrics

ACHD:

Adult congenital heart disease

EPAs:

Entrustable professional activities

PAD:

Practice analysis document

PD:

Program director

SPCTPD:

Society of pediatric cardiology training program directors

TCO:

Test content outline

References

  1. Noonan JA (2004) A history of pediatric specialties: the development of pediatric cardiology. Pediatr Res 56(2):298–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Armsby LB, Vincent RN, Foerster SR et al (2015) Task Force 3: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(6):699–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubin AM, Walsh EP, Franklin W et al (2015) Task force 4: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in electrophysiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(6):706–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feltes TF, Roth SJ, Almodovar MC et al (2015) Task force 5: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in critical care cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(6):712–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis AB, Martin GR, Bartz PJ et al (2015) Task force 1: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in general cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(6):677–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahle WT, Murphy AM, Li JS et al (2015) Task force 8: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in research and scholarly activity. Circulation 132(6):e107-113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross RD, Brook M, Koenig P et al (2015) 2015 SPCTPD/ACC/AAP/AHA training guidelines for pediatric cardiology fellowship programs (revision of the 2005 training guidelines for pediatric cardiology fellowship programs): introduction. Circulation 132(6):e43-47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Srivastava S, Printz BF, Geva T et al (2015) Task force 2: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in noninvasive cardiac imaging: endorsed by the American society of echocardiography and the society of pediatric echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(9):1009–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stout K, Valente AM, Bartz PJ et al (2015) Task force 6: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in adult congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(6):723–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Webber SA, Hsu DT, Ivy DD et al (2015) Task force 7: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in pulmonary hypertension, advanced heart failure, and transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(6):732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mittal V, Shah N, Dwyer AC et al (2020) Developing content for pediatric hospital medicine certification examination using practice analysis. Pediatrics 146(2):e20193186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Poniatowski PA, Dugosh JW, Baranowski RA et al (2019) Incorporating physician input into a maintenance of certification examination: a content validity tool. Acad Med 94(9):1369–1375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raymond MR (2001) Job analysis and the specification of content for licensure and certification examinations. Appl Meas Educ 14(4):369–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Turner DA, Boyer DL, Dwyer A et al (2020) Establishing the knowledge and skills necessary in pediatric critical care medicine: a systematic approach to practice analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 21(7):667–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey RJ (1991) Job analysis. In: Dunnette M, Hough L (eds) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Consulting Psychologists Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raymond MR (2016) Job analysis, practice analysis, and the content of credentialing examinations. In: Lane S, Raymond MR, Haladyna TM (eds) Handbook of Test Development, 2nd edn. Routledge, pp 144–164

    Google Scholar 

  17. McMahon CJ, Tretter JT, Redington AN et al (2021) Medical education and training within congenital cardiology: current global status and future directions in a post COVID-19 world. Cardiol Young 12:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Werho DK, DeWitt AG, Owens ST, McBride ME, van Schaik S, Roth SJ (2022) Establishing entrustable professional activities in pediatric cardiac critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med 23(1):54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The American Board of Pediatrics. Entrustable Professional Activities for Subspecialties. Accessed February 11, 2022. https://www.abp.org/content/entrustable-professional-activities-subspecialties

  20. The American Board of Pediatrics. 2019–2020 Pediatric Physicians Workforce Data Book. Accessed February 4, 2022. https://www.abp.org/sites/abp/files/pdf/workforcedata2019-2020.pdf

  21. The American Board of Pediatrics. Content Outline: Pediatric Cardiology. Accessed February 4, 2022. https://www.abp.org/sites/abp/files/pdf/pediatric_cardiology_content_outline.pdf

  22. The American Board of Pediatrics. Pediatric Cariology Content Outline. Accessed February 1, 2022. https://www.abp.org/sites/public/files/pdf/content-outline-card-starting-100122.pdf

  23. Brown DW, Allan CK, Newburger JW (2016) Training fellows in paediatric cardiology: the Harvard experience. Cardiol Young 26(8):1499–1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Campbell RM (2016) Training residents/fellows in paediatric cardiology: the Emory experience. Cardiol Young 26(8):1507–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Graham TP, Beekman RH, Allen HD et al (2005) ACCF/AHA/AAP recommendations for training in pediatric cardiology a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association/American college of physicians task force on clinical competence (ACC/AHA/AAP writing committee to develop training recommendations for pediatric cardiology). Circulation 112(16):2555–2580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Dr. David A. Turner for his review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RB and AM: participated in the practice analysis process, conceptualized and designed the study, carried out initial analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. NT, ES, UK, STD and NS: participated in the practice analysis process, reviewed data, drafted the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. JR: participated in the practice analysis process, contributed to the design of the study and initial manuscript draft, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. GM: participated in the practice analysis process and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. AD: conceptualized and designed the study and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel W. Taggart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Rossano is a consultant for Abiomed, Novartis, Bayer, Myokardia and Cytokenetics. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 114 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brucia, R.C., Taggart, N.W., Sagiv, E. et al. Applying Practice Analysis to Develop a New Test Content Outline for the Pediatric Cardiology Certification Examination. Pediatr Cardiol 44, 1057–1067 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-03070-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-03070-0

Keywords

Navigation