Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors for uroseptic shock in patients who undergo minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To identify risk factors that can predict which patient is likely to progress from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to uroseptic shock after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the upper urinary tract stones. We retrospectively reviewed 156 patients who suffered infectious complications after MPCNL from March 2014 to February 2016. Perioperative risk factors that could potentially contribute to uroseptic shock were compared to those of patients with only SIRS. 135 of the 156 patients developed to SIRS only, the remaining 21 patients progressed to uroseptic shock. The rate of positive preoperative urine nitrite was significantly higher (p < 0.001), stone diameter was larger (p = 0.015) and operative time was longer (p < 0.001) in uroseptic shock group. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that preoperative urine nitrite (OR 10.570, p = 0.025), stone size (OR 11.512, p = 0.009) and postoperative blood leukopenia (OR 0.009, p < 0.001) were independently related to uroseptic shock. Moreover, ROC curve analysis showed that white blood count threshold within the first 3 h of uroseptic shock was 2.98 × 109/L. The sensitivity and specificity of leukocyte count in predicting uroseptic shock were 90.5 and 92.6%, respectively. Preoperative urine nitrite, stone size and postoperative leukocyte count are statistically linked to uroseptic shock after MPCNL. Leukopenia of less than 2.98 × 109/L within 3 h after MPCNL can be a predictor for uroseptic shock. For patients who have high risk factors for developing uroseptic shock, the white blood count should be measured within 3 h after MPCNL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM et al (2007) Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. J Urol 177(2):576–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh P, Yadav S, Singh A et al (2016) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of risk factors and their impact on patient outcomes. Urol Int 96(2):207–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51(4):899–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jou YC, Lu CL, Chen FH et al (2015) Contributing factors for fever after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 85(3):527–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dogan HS, Guliyev F, Cetinkaya YS et al (2007) Importance of microbiological evaluation in management of infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 39(3):737–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Korets R, Graversen JA, Kates M et al (2011) Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy systemic inflammatory response: a prospective analysis of preoperative urine, renal pelvic urine and stone cultures. J Urol 186(5):1899–1903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Bag S, Ganesamoni R et al (2012) Risk factors for urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of 1 week of nitrofurantoin in reducing the risk of urosepsis. Urol Res 40(1):79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol SV et al (2005) Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Urol 173(5):1610–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Keeffe NK, Mortimer AJ, Sambrook PA et al (1993) Severe sepsis following percutaneous or endoscopic procedures for urinary tract stones. Br J Urol 72(3):277–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grabe M, Bartoletti R, Bjerklund Johansen TE et al (2015) Guidelines on urological infections: European Association of Urology. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/guideline/urological-infections/. Accessed Feb 2016

  11. Wu W, Yang D, Tiselius HG et al (2014) The characteristics of the stone and urine composition in Chinese stone formers: primary report of a single-center results. Urology 83(4):732–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu W, Yang B, Ou L et al (2014) Urinary stone analysis on 12,846 patients: a report from a single center in China. Urolithiasis 42(1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2015) Guidelines on urolithiasis: European Association of Urology. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/. Accessed Feb 2016

  14. Wu W, Zhao Z, Zhu H et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of calculi in horseshoe kidneys. J Endourol 28(8):926–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S et al (2013) Comparison of children versus adults undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-scale analysis of a single institution. PloS One 8(6):e66850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Jiang F, Wang Y et al (2012) Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy septic shock and severe hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. Urol Int 88(3):307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Draga RO, Kok ET, Sorel MR et al (2009) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: factors associated with fever after the first postoperative day and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Endourol 23(6):921–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gutierrez J, Smith A, Geavlete P et al (2013) Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 31(5):1135–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferry SA, Holm SE, Ferry BM et al (2015) High diagnostic accuracy of nitrite test paired with urine sediment can reduce unnecessary antibiotic therapy. Open Microbiol J 9:150–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Troxel SA, Low RK (2002) Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol 168(4 Pt 1):1348–1351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McAleer IM, Kaplan GW, Bradley JS et al (2003) Endotoxin content in renal calculi. J Urol 169(5):1813–1814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonen M, Turan H, Ozturk B et al (2008) Factors affecting fever following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Endourol 22(9):2135–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cadeddu JA, Chen R, Bishoff J et al (1998) Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 52(1):48–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Doğan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y et al (2002) Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol 16(9):649–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guohua Z, Wen Z, Xun L et al (2007) The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(4):307–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shigeta M, Hayashi M, Igawa M (1995) A clinical study of upper urinary tract calculi treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: association with bacteriuria before treatment. Urol Int 54(4):214–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu H, Zhu S, Yu S et al (2015) Early drastic decrease in white blood count can predict uroseptic shock induced by upper urinary tract endoscopic lithotripsy: a translational study. J Urol 193(6):2116–2122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bozkurt IH, Aydogdu O, Yonguc T et al (2015) Predictive value of leukocytosis for infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 86(1):25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kang MJ, Shin TG, Jo IJ et al (2012) Factors influencing compliance with early resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Shock 38(5):474–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenqi Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors can confirm that they have no other financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, J., Wan, S., Liu, L. et al. Predictors for uroseptic shock in patients who undergo minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 45, 573–578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0963-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0963-4

Keywords

Navigation