Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the correlation between computed tomography (CT) density of ureteral stones and their mineral composition. A total of 346 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy for calculi all fragments of which were acquired at a single institution from 2009 to 2011 were analyzed. The maximum and mean CT densities were measured preoperatively. A mineral analysis revealed calcium oxalate in 203 (58.7 %), mixed calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate in 78 (23.0 %), calcium phosphate in 18 (5.2 %), uric acid in 8 (2.3 %), struvite in 3 (0.9 %), and cysteine in 5 (1.4 %). The mean Hounsfield units (HUs) of the CT density were 1046 HUs in calcium oxalate, 1101 HUs in mixed calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate, 835 HUs in calcium phosphate, 549 HUs in uric acid, 729 HUs in struvite, and 698 HUs in cystine. The HUs in calcium oxalate were significantly higher than those in uric acid (p < 0.01) and struvite (p < 0.01). Those in monohydrate stones were significantly higher, compared with dehydrate stones (p < 0.05). We analyzed the largest number of stones than each published study to correlate their mineral composition and CT density. Calcium component stones showed significantly higher CT densities than other types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Narepalem N, Sundaram CP, Boridy IC, Yan Y, Heiken JP, Clayman RV (2002) Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. J Urol 167(3):1235–1238 (pii: S0022-5347(05)65272-X)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, Essenmacher KR, Verga M, Glickman MG, Lange RC (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194(3):789–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ripolles T, Agramunt M, Errando J, Martinez MJ, Coronel B, Morales M (2004) Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs. unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol 14(1):129–136. doi:10.1007/s00330-003-1924-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Macejko A, Okotie OT, Zhao LC, Liu J, Perry K, Nadler RB (2009) Computed tomography-determined stone-free rates for ureteroscopy of upper-tract stones. J Endourol 23(3):379–382. doi:10.1089/end.2008.0240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ouzaid I, Al-Qahtani S, Dominique S, Hupertan V, Fernandez P, Hermieu JF, Delmas V, Ravery V (2012) A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients’ selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study. BJU Int 110(11 Pt B):E438–E442. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26(9):1125–1130. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J (2012) The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. Urology 80(3):524–528. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Ogawa T, Uemura H, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J (2012) Stone area and volume are correlated with operative time for cystolithotripsy for bladder calculi using a holmium: yttrium garnet laser. Scand J Urol Nephrol 46(4):298–303. doi:10.3109/00365599.2012.672456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Ishigaki H, Ogawa T, Uemura H, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19(9):881–885. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03046.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel SR, Stanton P, Zelinski N, Borman EJ, Pozniak MA, Nakada SY, Pickhardt PJ (2011) Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement. J Urol 186(6):2275–2279. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT (1996) Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(5):1109–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT (1996) Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(1):97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC (1997) Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 204(1):27–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA (2003) Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 169(5):1679–1681. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000055608.92069.3a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel SR, Haleblian G, Zabbo A, Pareek G (2009) Hounsfield units on computed tomography predict calcium stone subtype composition. Urol Int 83(2):175–180. doi:10.1159/000230020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bandi G, Meiners RJ, Pickhardt PJ, Nakada SY (2009) Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. BJU Int 103(4):524–528. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08069.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chevreau G, Troccaz J, Conort P, Renard-Penna R, Mallet A, Daudon M, Mozer P (2009) Estimation of urinary stone composition by automated processing of CT images. Urol Res 37(5):241–245. doi:10.1007/s00240-009-0195-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perks AE, Gotto G, Teichman JM (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography. J Urol 178(3 Pt 1):912–915. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B (1998) Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 159(3):673–675 (pii:S0022-5347(01)63698-X)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58(2):170–173 (pii: S0090-4295(01)01115-3)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Kesarvani P, Kapoor A, Mukhopadhyay S (2005) Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi. BJU Int 95(9):1285–1288. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05520.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takashi Kawahara HI, Terao Hideyuki, Kakizoe Manabu, Kato Yoshitake, Uemura Hiroji, Kubota Yoshinobu, Matsuzaki Junichi (2013) Early ureteral catheter removal after ureteroscopic lithotripsy using ureteral access sheath. Urolithiasis 41(1):31–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zarse CA, Hameed TA, Jackson ME, Pishchalnikov YA, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr (2007) CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro. Urol Res 35(4):201–206. doi:10.1007/s00240-007-0104-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Kawahara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawahara, T., Miyamoto, H., Ito, H. et al. Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography. Urolithiasis 44, 231–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0823-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0823-z

Keywords

Navigation