Skip to main content
Log in

“Flap-to-defect” concept for closure of circular skin defects: the ice cream cone flap

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

While sliding-type skin flaps such as advancement and rotation flaps are useful for closing circular skin defects that are too large to close primarily, these flaps are associated with some technical difficulties that must be overcome. In this study, we aimed to present our clinical experience using an alternative curvilinear advancement-transposition flap designed based upon a “flap-to-defect” concept.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of patient charts and operative photographs of all “ice cream cone flaps” performed at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery between May 2014 and November 2018. This method, for the repair of circular-shaped wounds, is intended to allow appropriate distribution of closure tension without necessitating changing the shape of the defect. Patient age, gender, defect size and region, postoperative complications, and esthetic/functional satisfaction were evaluated.

Results

The technique, based on the planning of a curvilinear advancement flap that mirrors the defect, was used for reconstruction of circular skin defects that involved various parts of the body. Information from 30 patients with defects ranging from 100 × 70 to 20 × 20 mm with a mean diameter of 30.3 × 20.8 mm were reviewed for the study. All flaps survived without wound infection, hematoma, or flap necrosis complications. During the follow-up period, acceptable esthetic results were achieved.

Conclusions

This technique is a good alternative for the closure of small to moderate circular skin defects where adequate skin laxity is present.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thorne CH (2007) Techniques and principles in plastic surgery. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams Wilkins, pp 12

  2. Johnson TM, Nelson BR (1992) Aesthetic reconstruction of skin cancer defects using flaps and grafts. Am J Cosmet Surg 9:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mutaf M, Sunay M, Bulut O (2008) The "reading man" procedure: a new technique for the closure of circular skin defects. Ann Plast Surg 60(4):420–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lovald ST, Topp SG, Ochoa JA, Gabal CW (2013) Biomechanics of the monopedicle skin flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149(6):858–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shew M, Kriet JD, Humphrey D (2017) Flap basics II: advancement flaps. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 25(3):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalus R, Zamora S (1996) Aesthetic considerations in facial reconstructive surgery: the V-Y flap revisited. Aesthetic Plas Surg 20(1):83–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Calderón W, Andrades P, Leniz P, Piñeros JL, Llanos S, Roa R, Irribarren O (2004) The cone flap: a new and versatile fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(6):1539–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanson NA (1995) Classifications, definitions and concepts in flap surgery. In: Cummings CW (ed) Local flaps in facial reconstruction. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 63–74

    Google Scholar 

  9. Golomb FM (1984) Closure of the circular defect with double rotation flaps and Z-plasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 74(6):813–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keser A, Sensöz O, Mengi AS (1998) Double opposing semicircular flap: a modification of opposing Z-plasty for closing circular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(4):1001–1007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ausín A (1997) The "trap-door" scar deformity. Clin Plast Surg 4(2):255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koranda FC, Webster RC (1997) Trap door effect in nasolabial flaps. Causes and corrections. Arch Otolaryngol 111(7):421–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enver Arpaci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Enver Arpaci declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This a retrospective study, the Pamukkale University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.                                                                           

Patient consent

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOC 219 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arpaci, E. “Flap-to-defect” concept for closure of circular skin defects: the ice cream cone flap. Eur J Plast Surg 44, 211–218 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01770-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01770-5

Keywords

Navigation