Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microsurgical toe-to-finger transfer of the nail system: long-term outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Reconstruction of the nail unit is often a neglected entity with few reports in the literature addressing the technique of its repair. The reconstruction is done with either non-vascularized nail grafts or vascularized free nail transfers, which have the benefit of transferring the germinal matrix which allows for proper nail growth. The nail is a dynamic structure that grows and changes in shape. Long-term follow-up is a requirement to determine the success of the reconstruction.

Methods

We present eleven patients with total nail unit loss who underwent microsurgical total nail unit transfer. Six objective criteria were used to assess nail growth: Eponychial and paronychial retraction, speed of nail growth, nail orientation, adhesion to the nail bed, and the presence of nail fracture. Results ranged from “excellent” to “poor” according to the proposed score.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 16.5 months. We had no cases of total or partial flap loss. No acute complications were encountered. The short pedicle technique was used in nine of the cases while the long pedicle technique in only two cases. Six patients had “excellent” results, four reported a “good” result, and only one patient had a “fair” result.

Conclusions

Microsurgical toe-to-finger nail unit transfer is a reliable option for nail reconstruction when total nail loss is present. It holds the advantage of transferring all the components of the nail system including the germinal matrix and the cutaneous folds, which allows proper nail growth and an acceptable cosmetic outcome.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta AK, Tosti A (2013) Nails and the clinician. Clin Dermatol. 31(5):507–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pessa JE, Tsai T-M, Li Y, Kleinert HE (1990) The repair of nail deformities with the nonvascularized nail bed graft: indications and results. J Hand Surg Am. 15(3):466–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rai A, Jha MK, Makhija LK, Bhattacharya S, Sethi N, Baranwal S (2014) An algorithmic approach to posttraumatic nail deformities based on anatomical classification. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg. 67(4):5400–5407

  4. Brown RE, Zook EG, Russell RC (1999) Fingertip reconstruction with flaps and nail bed grafts. J Hand Surg Am. 24(2):345–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Richert B, Choffray A, De La Brassinne M (2008) Cosmetic surgery for congenital nail deformities. J Cosmetic Dermatol. 7(4):304–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. André J, Sass U, Richert B, Theunis A (2013) Nail pathology. Clin Dermatol. 31(5):526–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Endo T, Nakayama Y, Soeda S (1992) Vascularized nail flap vs. free nail graft. Eur J Plast Surg. 15(2):72–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Berker D (2013) Nail anatomy. Clin Dermatol. 31(5):509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleckman P, Allan C (2001) Surgical anatomy of the nail unit. Dermatol Surg. 27(3):257–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haneke E (2015) Anatomy of the nail unit and the nail biopsy. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 34(2):95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith DO, Oura C, Kimura C, Toshimori K (1991) The distal venous anatomy of the finger. J Hand Surg Am. 16(2):303–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Endo T, Nakayama Y, Soeda S (1997) Nail transfer: evolution of the reconstructive procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 100(4):907–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Buncke HJ, Rose EH (1979) Free toe-to-fingertip neurovascular flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 63(5):607–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Endo T, Nakayama Y (1996) Short-pedicle vascularized nail flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 97(3):656–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shibata M, Seki T, Yoshizu T, Saito H, Tajima T (1991) Microsurgical toenail transfer to the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 88(1):102–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilbert A (1985) Reconstruction of congenital hand defects with microvascular toe transfers. Hand Clin. 1(2):351–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirasé Y, Kojima T, Matsui M (1997) Aesthetic fingertip reconstruction with a free vascularized nail graft: a review of 60 flaps involving partial toe transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 99(3):774–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bharathi RR, Bajantri B (2011) Nail bed injuries and deformities of nail. Indian J Plast Surg. 44(2):197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitney TM, Lineaweaver WC, Buncke HJ, Nugent K (1990) Clinical results of bony fixation methods in digital replantation. J Hand Surg Am. 15(2):328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bakhach J, Demiri E, Guimberteau JC (2005) Use of the eponychial flap to restore the length of a short nail: a review of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 116(2):478–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koh SH, You Y, Kim YW, Kim JS, Lee DC, Roh SY, Lee KJ, Hong MK (2019) Long-term outcomes of nail bed reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 46(6):580–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and material

All data in this manuscript is available upon the request of the editor. These data and material support our published claims and comply with field standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Reem Karami, Paul Beaineh, Dimitri Bakhash, and Joseph Bakhash. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Reem Karami, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Bakhach.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Reem Karami, Paul Beaineh, Dimitri Bakhach and Joseph Bakhach declares that they have no conflict of interest

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. For children below the age of 16 years informed consent was obtained from their legal guardian. Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs. The pictures are of hands and toes and have patient identifiers

Code availability

All code is available for publishing

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. For children below the age of 16 years informed consent was obtained from their legal guardian.

Consent to publish

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karami, R., Beaineh, P., Bakhach, D. et al. Microsurgical toe-to-finger transfer of the nail system: long-term outcomes. Eur J Plast Surg 44, 355–360 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01759-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01759-0

Keywords

Navigation