Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From presentation to publication: an 11-year comparison of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery research among Chilean plastic surgeons

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The transition from a presentation in a scientific conference to publication in an academic journal should be the ideal journey for a research project. This phenomenon is summarized in a conversion rate, which has been previously reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and conversion rate of Chilean authors’ aesthetic and reconstructive research projects in a nationwide study.

Methods

Conference abstracts from the two official Chilean plastic surgery meetings released between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. A bibliographic search of all published articles involving each Chilean plastic surgeon followed. This information was cross-referenced to obtain the conversion rates and time to publication for transferred studies. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test were used to establish statistical associations.

Results

Four hundred sixty-eight abstracts were included, and 227 articles were found in our bibliographic search. Of these, 82 were considered to qualify as transferred studies. Aesthetic surgery publications had a higher proportion of prospective design than reconstructive articles (34.6% vs 20.1% (p = 0.02)). Median time to publication was 15 months, with a longer delay for reconstructive articles (19.5 vs 13 (p = 0.035)). The 2008–2016 conversion rate index was 19.2%, which was significantly higher for aesthetic surgery studies (36.4% vs 11.9% (p < 0.001)).

Conclusions

Despite a smaller proportion of plastic surgery research being focused on aesthetic topics in our sample, they accounted for higher quality study design, shorter time to publication, and higher overall chances of publication following presentations in local meetings.

Level of evidence: Not ratable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Resnik DB (2018) Examining the social benefits principle in research with human participants. Health Care Anal 26:66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothberg MB, Kleppel R, Friderici JL, Hinchey K (2014) Implementing a resident research program to overcome barriers to resident research. Acad Med 89:1133–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seaburg LA, Wang AT, West CP, Reed DA, Halvorsen AJ, Engstler G, Oxentenko AS, Beckman TJ (2016) Associations between resident physicians’ publications and clinical performance during residency training. BMC Med Educ 16:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asaad M, Rajesh A, Tarabishi AS et al (2020) Do we publish what we present? a critical analysis of abstracts presented at three plastic surgery meetings. Plast Reconstr Surg:1555–1564. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006849

  5. Hicks RRW (2015) Transforming a presentation to a publication: tips for nurse practitioners. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 27:488–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Busaidi IS (2018) Publication and authorship challenges experienced by medical students involved in biomedical research. N Z Med J 131:89–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan A-W, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, Krumholz HM, Ghersi D, van der Worp HB (2014) Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet 383:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scherer RW, Meerpohl JJ, Pfeifer N, Schmucker C, Schwarzer G, von Elm E, Cochrane Methodology Review Group (2018) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:MR000005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kain N, Mishra A, McArthur P (2010) Are we still publishing our presented abstracts from the British Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (BAPRAS)? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1572–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khorasani H, Lassen MH, Kuzon W, Bonde C (2017) Scientific impact of presentations from the EURAPS and the AAPS meetings: a 10-year review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Izadpanah A, Izadpanah A, Islur A, Sinno H (2014) Publication bias in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a retrospective review on 128 abstracts presented to the Annual EURAPS Meeting. Eur J Plast Surg 37:387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Steen LPE, Hage JJ, Loonen MPJ, Kon M (2004) Full publication of papers presented at the 1995 through 1999 European Association of Plastic Surgeons annual scientific meetings: a systemic bibliometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung KJ, Lee JH, Kim YH, Kim TG, Ha JH (2012) How many presentations are published as full papers? Arch Plast Surg 39:238–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell CA, Restrepo C, Navas G, Vergara I, Peluffo L (2019) Plastic surgery medical tourism in Colombia: a review of 658 international patients and 1,796 cosmetic surgery procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:e2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hanning RM, Leatherdale ST (2015) Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev 4:138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregory TN, Liu T, Machuk A, Arneja JS (2012) What is the ultimate fate of presented abstracts? The conversion rates of presentations to publications over a five-year period from three North American plastic surgery meetings. Can J Plast Surg 20(1):33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yumeen S, Ho ES, Wong K, Borschel GH (2018) What factors influence resident research publication in the division of plastic surgery? J Surg Educ 75:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manring MM, Panzo JA, Mayerson JL (2014) A framework for improving resident research participation and scholarly output. J Surg Educ 71:8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alweis R, Wenderoth S, Donato A (2015) Effectiveness of iterative interventions to increase research productivity in one residency program. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 5:29203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevenson MD, Smigielski EM, Naifeh MM, Abramson EL, Todd C, Li STT (2017) Increasing scholarly activity productivity during residency: a systematic review. Acad Med 92:250–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Navia Torelli A, Yáñez Caro G, González Bresky JT et al (2020) Participación de residentes de cirugía plástica de Chile en la publicación científica: Revisión de los últimos 20 años. Rev Cir 72(6). https://doi.org/10.35687/s2452-45492020006595

  22. Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P (2020) Training undergraduate medical students on research methodology in the competency-based curriculum. AJIM 8:35. https://doi.org/10.4103/AJIM.AJIM_73_19

  23. Rivera JA, Levine RB, Wright SM (2005) Completing a scholarly project during residency training. Perspectives of residents who have been successful. J Gen Intern Med 20:366–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Young RA, Dehaven MJ, Passmore C, Baumer JG (2006) Research participation, protected time, and research output by family physicians in family medicine residencies. Fam Med 38:341–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Denadai R, Pinho AS, Júnior SH et al (2017) Conversion of plastic surgery meeting abstract presentations to full manuscripts: a Brazilian perspective. Rev Col Bras Cir 44:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM (2012) Globalization of plastic surgery: the world of plastic and reconstructive surgery in Brazil. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:967–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rini IS, Krisna MA, Basuki A, Djarot KR (2018) The characteristics of private plastic surgery practice in developing country: an epidemiological study. Indian J Plast Surg 51:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Batista BN (2017) State of Plastic Surgery in Brazil. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(12):e1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gabriel A, Patrick Maxwell G (2019) Reading between the lines: a plastic surgeon’s guide to evaluating the quality of evidence in research publications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(6):e2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2017) Evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:3533–3534

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the data collection contributions of Maria Fernanda Rojas and Daniel Moreno.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Surgery Division, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330024, Santiago, Chile

    Rodrigo Tejos, Alfonso Navia, Susana Searle, Gonzalo Yañez, Bruno Dagnino, Claudio Guerra & Alvaro Cuadra

  2. Plastic Surgery Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Juan Enrique Berner

  3. Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Juan Enrique Berner

Authors
  1. Rodrigo Tejos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alfonso Navia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan Enrique Berner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susana Searle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gonzalo Yañez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bruno Dagnino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Claudio Guerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Alvaro Cuadra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Alfonso Navia, Rodrigo Tejos, Enrique Berner, Bruno Dagnino, and Claudio Guerra. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Alvaro Cuadra and Susana Searle, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvaro Cuadra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Rodrigo Tejos received an educational grant from Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES): 2017 SAGES Research Grant. This research grant was finalized on March 2019. Dr. Alfonso Navia, Dr. Juan Enrique Berner, Dra. Susana Searle, Dr. Gonzalo Yañez, Dr. Bruno Dagnino, Dr. Claudio Guerra, and Dr. Alvaro Cuadra declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This is an observational study. The Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tejos, R., Navia, A., Berner, J.E. et al. From presentation to publication: an 11-year comparison of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery research among Chilean plastic surgeons. Eur J Plast Surg 44, 381–388 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01749-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01749-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation