Abstract
Background
Cartilage grafting is a common procedure in nasal reconstruction or dorsal augmentation. Costal cartilage is usually preferred to conchal or septal cartilage when a larger amount of graft is required, although this cartilage type is often complicated by postoperative warping. To overcome this complication, we suggest the use of multilayer costal grafts. This study aims to compare single-layer and multilayer costal grafts concerning angle of warpage, cartilage viability, and architectural changes in the animal model.
Methods
Twelve costal grafts were harvested from a fresh Landrace pig cadaver; six were shaped in single-layer grafts and six into a multilayer structure, both having the same thickness. These grafts were implanted in subcutaneous dorsal skin pockets of six athymic nude rats. After 8 weeks, the animals were euthanized and the grafts removed. Pictures of the cartilages were acquired. The samples were processed and stained for histological (hematoxylin and eosin, Alcian blue, Von Kossa, Masson-Goldner trichrome, and Verhoeff/Van Gieson stains) and immunohistochemical (GFAP) analyses.
Results
A higher grade of deformation was observed in the single-layer group compared to the multilayer one (5.2° vs 0.3°). Multilayer cartilage showed significantly higher chondrocyte density (70.4 vs 44.9 cells per field at 40×) and the lowest loss of nuclei in chondrocyte lacunae percentage (0.03 vs 3.2 %). Single-layer grafts also showed sporadic inflammatory cell infiltration, not found in multilayer ones.
Conclusions
Multilayer grafts showed a decreased degree of warping as well as an increased viability and should be considered as a valuable alternative in nasal reconstruction.
Level of evidence: Not ratable
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00238-016-1224-4/MediaObjects/238_2016_1224_Fig10_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cardenas-Camarena L, Guerrero MT (1999) Use of cartilaginous autografts in nasal surgery: 8 years of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1003–1014
Wright ST, Calhoun KH, Decherd M, Quinn FB (2007) Conchal cartilage harvest: donor site morbidities, patient satisfaction, and cosmetic outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:298–299
Moshaver A, Gantous A (2007) The use of autogenous costal cartilage graft in septorhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:862–867
Straith RE (1991) Five long-term case reports (average 15 years) of saddlenose correction using cast Silastic implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:1064–1075
Lovice DB, Mingrone MD, Toriumi DM (1999) Grafts amd implants in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 32:113–141
Staffel G, Shockley W (1995) Nasal implants. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 28:295–308
Fry H (1967) Nasal skeletal trauma and the interlocked stresses of the nasal septal cartilage. Br J Plast Surg 20:146–158
Gibson T, Davis W (1958) The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 10:257
Gunter JP, Clark CP, Friedman RM (1997) Internal stabilization of autogenous rib cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a barrier to cartilage warping. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:161–169
Lopez MA, Shah AR, Westine JG, O'Grady K, Toriumi DM (2007) Analysis of the physical properties of costal cartilage in a porcine model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:35–39
Kim DW, Shah AR, Toriumi DM (2006) Concentric and eccentric carved costal cartilage: a comparison of warping. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8:42–46
Adams WP Jr, Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Clark CP, Robinson JB Jr (1999) . The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:265–270
Welling DB, Maves MD, Schuller DE, Bardach J (1988) Irradiated homologous cartilage grafts. Long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114:291–295
Schuller DE, Bardach J, Krause CJ (1977) Irradiated homologous costal cartilate for facial contour restoration. Arch Otolaryngol 103:12–15
Dingman RO, Grabb WC (1961) Costal cartilage homografts preserved by irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg Transpl Bull 28:562–567
Swanepoel PF, Fysh R (2007) Laminated dorsal beam graft to eliminate postoperative twisting complications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:285–289
Cakmak O, Bircan S, Buyuklu F, et al. (2005) Viability of crushed and diced cartilage grafts: a study in rabbits. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:21–26
Brenner KA, McConnell MP, Evans GR, Calvert JW (2006) Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:105–115
Calvert JW, Brenner K, DaCosta-Iyer M, Evans GR, Daniel RK (2006) Histological analysis of human diced cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:230–236
Tasman AJ, Diener PA, Litschel R (2013) The diced cartilage glue graft for nasal augmentation. Morphometric evidence of longevity. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15:86–94
European Commission, Directive 86/609/EEC on the protection of Animals used for Experimental and other scientific purposes. 1986. Retrieved February 8, 2007
Tasman AJ, Wallner F, Neumeier R (2000) Antibiotic impregnation of cartilage implants: diffusion kinetics of fluoroquinolones. Laryngorhinootol 79:30–33
Rolstad B, Benestad HB (1984) The "natural resistance" to bone marrow allografts in normal and athymic nude rats. Rapid cytotoxic reactions both in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Immunol 14:793–799
Rolstad B (2001) The athymic nude rat: an animal experimental model to reveal novel aspects of innate immune responses? Immunol Rev 184:136–144
Thomas FT, Marchman W, Carobbi A, et al. (1991) Immunobiology of the xenograft response: xenograft rejection in immunodeficient animals. Transplant Proc 23:208–209
Rosenbaum PR (2002) Observational studies, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Notohara K, Hsueh CL, Awai M (1990) Glial fsibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity of chondrocytes in immature and mature teratomas. Acta Pathol Jpn 40:335–342
Benjamin M, Archer CW, Ralphs JR (1994) Cytoskeleton of cartilage cells. Microsc Res Tech 28:372–377
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical standard
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Conflict of interest
Giovanni Ravasio, Riccardo Gazzola, Giuseppe Cottone, Luciano Lanfranchi, and Franz Wilhelm Baruffaldi Preis declare they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravasio, G., Gazzola, R., Cottone, G. et al. Multilayer costal grafts to prevent cartilage deformation: an experimental study. Eur J Plast Surg 39, 401–408 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1224-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1224-4