Skip to main content
Log in

Silk Vista Baby flow diverter stent for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective observational study

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Flow diversion changed the approach to complex intracranial aneurysms, leading to a widespread use and a rapid technological evolution. Indeed, indications continued to expand, including ruptured intracranial aneurysms in selected cases. Recently, new devices have been designed specifically to target smaller vessels. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter study to evaluate clinical outcome, complications, and occlusion rate of patients with ruptured aneurysms treated with new generation low profile Silk Vista Baby (SVB) flow diverter stent (FD).

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study on consecutive patients who underwent treatment with SVB for ruptured aneurysms at 12 Italian centers. Primary end point was favorable clinical outcome rate, defined as modified ranking score (mRS) of 0–2 at the 3 months. Secondary outcomes were complication rate, aneurysm re-rupture, and complete aneurysm occlusion at last radiological follow-up.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included; at 3 months’ follow-up, 19 patients (79.1%) had favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0–2). Three patients (12.5%) died during follow-up. In-stent thrombosis occurred in two cases (8.3%), managed with glycoprotein IIb/IIIA and intra-stent angioplasty, without clinical consequences. In 18 (85.7%) patients, complete occlusion at 3 months was demonstrated. No rebleeding occurred during follow-up. Presentation with unfavorable World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grading system (WFNS) and posterior circulation location were both significantly correlated with unfavorable clinical outcome (p = 0.005 and p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Our data suggests that low profile FD treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms located distally of the circle of Willis is feasible. New generation low profile FD may represent an alternative option in carefully selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM et al (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li H, Pan R, Wang H, Rong X et al (2013) Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 44:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M (2011) Treatment strategies for complex intracranial aneurysms: review of a 12-year experience at the University of Cincinnati. Skull Base 21:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodily KD, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G et al (2011) Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1232–1236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2015) Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on deconstructive versus reconstructive and flow-diverter treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2331–2339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pierot L, Cognard C, Spelle L, Moret J (2012) Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:12–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Rooij SBT, van Rooij WJ, Peluso JP et al (2017) WEB treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 100 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:2282–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cagnazzo F, Di Carlo DT, Cappucci M et al (2018) Acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1669–1675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Madaelil TP, Moran CJ, Cross DT 3rd, Kansagra AP (2017) Flow diversion in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:590–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Moscovici S et al (2021) Flow-diverter stents in the early management of acutely ruptured brain aneurysms: effective rebleeding protection with low thromboembolic complications. J Neurosurg 16:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinck MFM, Jäger M, De VJ et al (2020) Flow diversion treatment for acutely ruptured aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 12:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui L, Peng Q, Ha W et al (2009) Parent artery occlusion for intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 15:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Russo R, Bradac GB, Castellan L et al (2021) Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study. J Neuroradiol 48:479–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. www.debene.com/productos/balt/media/docs/balt__silk_vista_baby__brochure.pdf (accessed 15 Feb 2022)

  15. Saver JL, Chapot R, Agid R et al (2020) Thrombectomy for distal, medium vessel occlusions. A consensus statement on present knowledge and promising directions. Stroke 51:2872–2884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’kelly CJ, Krings T, Fiorella D et al (2010) A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 16:133–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boogaarts HD, Van Lieshout JH, Van Amerongen MJ et al (2015) Aneurysm diameter as a risk factor for pretreatment rebleeding: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 122:921–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hudson JS, Prout BS, Nagahama Y et al (2019) External ventricular drain and hemorrhage in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients on dual antiplatelet therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 84:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Toth G, Cerejo R (2018) Intracranial aneurysms: review of current science and management. Vasc Med 23:276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shapiro M, Raz E, Becske T et al (2014) Variable porosity of the pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:727–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Caroff J, Aubert L, Lavenu-Bombled C et al (2022) JENI Research Collaboration. Antithrombotic therapies for neurointerventional surgery: a 2021 French comprehensive national survey. J Neurointerv Surg 018601

  22. Mallouk N, Labruyère C, Reny JL et al (2012) Prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost 107:494–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Foreman PM et al (2017) Use of platelet function testing before pipeline embolization device placement: a multicenter cohort study. Stroke 48:1322–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta R, Moore JM, Griessenauer CJ et al (2016) Assessment of dual-antiplatelet regimen for pipeline embolization device placement: a survey of major academic neurovascular centers in the United States. World Neurosurg 96:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ospel JM, Brouwer P, Dorn F et al (2020) Antiplatelet management for stent-assisted coiling and flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a DELPHI consensus statement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41:1856–1862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang C, Vadasz A, Szikora I (2017) Treatment of ruptured blood blister aneurysms using primary flow-diverter stenting with considerations for adjunctive coiling: A single-centre experience and literature review. Interv Neuroradiol 23:465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Santos-Franco JA, Zenteno M, Lee A (2008) Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar system. A comprehensive review on natural history and treatment options. Neurosurg Rev 31:131–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mizutani T, Aruga T, Kirino T et al (1995) Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery 36:905–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Russo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate/consent for publication

Not required considering the retrospective nature of the study according to the local institutional review board of the coordinating center (no. 0010755–2022).

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Russo, R., Boghi, A., Giorgianni, A. et al. Silk Vista Baby flow diverter stent for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective observational study. Neuroradiology 64, 2031–2037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03003-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03003-x

Keywords

Navigation