Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up assessment of atherosclerotic plaques in acute ischemic stroke patients using high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Data on evolution of intracranial plaques in acute ischemic stroke patients after receiving medical therapy is still limited. We aimed to investigate the plaque features associated with culprit lesions and to explore the plaque longitudinal changes during treatment using high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging (VW-MRI).

Methods

Twenty-three patients (16 men; mean age, 51.4 years ± 11.1) with acute ischemic stroke underwent 3-T VW-MRI for intracranial atherosclerosis and were taken follow-up assessments. Each identified plaque was retrospectively classified as culprit, probably culprit, or nonculprit. Plaque features were analyzed at both baseline and follow-up and were compared using paired t-test, paired Wilcoxon test, or McNemar’s test.

Results

A total of 87 intracranial plaques were identified (23 [26.4%] culprit, 10 [11.5%] probably culprit, and 54 [62.1%] nonculprit plaques). The median time interval between initial and follow-up MRI scans was 8.0 months. In the multiple ordinal logistic regression analysis, plaque contrast ratio (CR) (OR, 1.037; 95% CI, 1.013–1.062; P = 0.002) and surface irregularity (OR, 4.768; 95% CI, 1.064–21.349; P = 0.041) were independently associated with culprit plaques. During follow-up, plaque length, maximum thickness, normalized wall index (NWI), stenosis degree, and CR significantly decreased (all P-values < 0.05) in the culprit plaque group. The plaque NWI and CR dropped in the probably culprit plaques (P = 0.041, 0.026, respectively). In the nonculprit plaque group, only plaque NWI and stenosis degree showed significant decrement (P = 0.017, 0.037, respectively).

Conclusion

Follow-up VW-MRI may contribute to plaque risk stratification and may provide valuable insights into the evolution of different plaques in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ICAD:

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease

VW-MRI:

Vessel wall MR imaging

NWI:

Normalized wall index

CR:

Contrast ratio

References

  1. Yaghi S, Prabhakaran S, Khatri P, Liebeskind DS (2019) Intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 50:1286–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qureshi AI, Caplan LR (2014) Intracranial atherosclerosis. The Lancet 383:984–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoshino T, Sissani L, Labreuche J et al (2018) Prevalence of systemic atherosclerosis burdens and overlapping stroke etiologies and their associations with long-term vascular prognosis in stroke with intracranial atherosclerotic disease. JAMA Neurol 75:203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nahab F, Cotsonis G, Lynn M et al (2008) Prevalence and prognosis of coexistent asymptomatic intracranial stenosis. Stroke 39:1039–1041

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim BJ, Hong K-S, Cho Y-J et al (2014) Predictors of symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: what is different and why? J Atheroscler Thromb 21:605–617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung J-W, Cha J, Lee MJ et al (2020) Intensive statin treatment in acute ischaemic stroke patients with intracranial atherosclerosis: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study (STAMINA-MRI Study). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 91:204–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang X, Chen L, Li S et al (2020) Enhancement characteristics of middle cerebral arterial atherosclerotic plaques over time and their correlation with stroke recurrence. J Magn Reson Imaging 53:953–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ni J, Yao M, Gao S, Cui L-y (2011) Stroke risk and prognostic factors of asymptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis. J Neurol Sci 301:63–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandell DM, Mossa-Basha M, Qiao Y et al (2017) Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Am J Neuroradiol 38:218–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiao Y, Anwar Z, Intrapiromkul J et al (2016) Patterns and implications of intracranial arterial remodeling in stroke patients. Stroke 47:434–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Qiao Y, Zeiler SR, Mirbagheri S et al (2014) Intracranial plaque enhancement in patients with cerebrovascular events on high-spatial-resolution MR images. Radiology 271:534–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu Y, Ye M-f, Zhao J-j et al (2021) Gadolinium enhancement of atherosclerotic plaque in the intracranial artery. Neurol Res 43:1040–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Skarpathiotakis M, Mandell DM, Swartz RH, Tomlinson G, Mikulis DJ (2013) Intracranial atherosclerotic plaque enhancement in patients with ischemic stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 34:299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung TA-O, Wang L, Zou X et al (2021) Plaque morphology in acute symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 92:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwee RM, Qiao Y, Liu L, Zeiler SR, Wasserman BA (2019) Temporal course and implications of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque enhancement on high-resolution vessel wall MRI. Neuroradiology 61:651–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang W-J, Abrigo J, Soo YO-Y et al (2020) Regression of plaque enhancement within symptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerosis: a high-resolution MRI study. Front Neurol 11:755

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fakih R, Roa JA, Bathla G et al (2020) Detection and quantification of symptomatic atherosclerotic plaques with high-resolution imaging in cryptogenic stroke. Stroke 51:3623–3631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiao J, Padrick MM, Jiang T et al (2021) Acute ischemic stroke versus transient ischemic attack: Differential plaque morphological features in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic lesions. Atherosclerosis 319:72–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang W-Q, Huang B, Liu X-T, Liu H-J, Li P-J, Zhu W-Z (2014) Reproducibility of high-resolution MRI for the middle cerebral artery plaque at 3T. Eur J Radiol 83:e49–e55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang T, Tang R, Liu S et al (2020) Plaque characteristics of middle cerebral artery assessed using strategically acquired gradient echo (STAGE) and vessel wall MR contribute to misery downstream perfusion in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis. Eur Radiol 31:65–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu S, Luo Y, Wang C et al (2019) Combination of plaque characteristics, pial collaterals, and hypertension contributes to misery perfusion in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 51:195–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu F, Ma Q, Song H et al (2018) Differential features of culprit intracranial atherosclerotic lesions: a whole-brain vessel wall imaging study in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc 7:e009705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee HN, Ryu C-W, Yun SJ (2018) Vessel-wall magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 9:1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Song JW, Pavlou A, Xiao J, Kasner SE, Fan Z, Messé SR (2021) Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Stroke 52:193–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Qiao Y, Etesami M, Astor BC, Zeiler SR, Trout HH, Wasserman BA (2012) Carotid Plaque neovascularization and hemorrhage detected by MR imaging are associated with recent cerebrovascular ischemic events. Am J Neuroradiol 33:755–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Chen H, Sun J et al (2017) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid vasa vasorum in relation to coronary and cerebrovascular events. Atherosclerosis 263:420–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Portanova A, Hakakian N, Fau-Mikulis DJ et al (2013) Intracranial vasa vasorum: insights and implications for imaging. Radiology 267:667–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Samaniego EA, Roa JA, Zhang H et al (2020) Increased contrast enhancement of the parent vessel of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in 7T MR imaging. J Neurointerv Surg 12:1018–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roa JA, Zanaty M, Osorno-Cruz C et al (2021) Objective quantification of contrast enhancement of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a high-resolution vessel wall imaging validation study. J Neurosurg 134:862–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Feng X, Chan KL, Lan L et al (2019) Stroke mechanisms in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 50:2692–2699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao D-L, Deng G, Xie B et al (2016) Wall characteristics and mechanisms of ischaemic stroke in patients with atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery stenosis: a high-resolution MRI study. Neurol Res 38:606–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Banerjee C, Chimowitz MI (2017) Stroke caused by atherosclerosis of the major intracranial arteries. Circ Res 120:502–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi Z, Li J, Zhao M et al (2021) Progression of Plaque burden of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque predicts recurrent stroke/transient ischemic attack: a pilot follow-up study using higher-resolution MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 54:560–570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Leung TW, Wang L, Soo YOY et al (2015) Evolution of intracranial atherosclerotic disease under modern medical therapy. Ann Neurol 77:478–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xuehua Lin performed the study and drafted the manuscript. Material preparation, data collection, image post-processing and analysis were performed by Xuehua Lin, Wei Guo and Dejun She. Feng Wang carried out the statistical analyses. Dairong Cao and Zhen Xing conceived the study idea, participated in its design, and helped in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dairong Cao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approve

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

The study was approved by our institutional review committee. Informed consent was waived off due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 230 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, X., Guo, W., She, D. et al. Follow-up assessment of atherosclerotic plaques in acute ischemic stroke patients using high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging. Neuroradiology 64, 2257–2266 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03002-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03002-y

Keywords

Navigation