Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam computed tomography without pre-diluted contrast medium

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been introduced and accepted as a useful technique to evaluate delicate vascular anatomy and neurovascular stents. Current protocol for CBCT requires quantitative dilution of contrast medium to obtain adequate quality images. Here, we introduce simple methods to obtain contrast-enhanced CBCT without quantitative contrast dilution.

Methods

A simple experiment was performed to estimate the change in flow rate in the internal carotid artery during the procedure. Transcranial doppler (TCD) was used to evaluate the velocity change before and after catheterization and fluid infusion. In addition, 0.3 cm3/s (n = 3) and 0.2 cm3/s (n = 7) contrast infusions were injected and followed by saline flushes using a 300 mmHg pressure bag to evaluate neurovascular stent and host arteries.

Results

Flow velocities changed −15 ± 6.8 % and +17 ± 5.5 % from baseline during catheterization and guiding catheter flushing with a 300 mmHg pressure bag, respectively. Evaluation of the stents and vascular structure was feasible using this technique in all patients. Quality assessment showed that the 0.2 cm3/s contrast infusion protocol was better for evaluating the stent and host artery.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced CBCT can be performed without quantitative contrast dilution. Adequate contrast dilution can be achieved with a small saline flush and normal blood flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CBCT:

Cone-beam CT

CM:

Contrast medium

mFV:

Mean flow velocity

TCD:

Transcranial Doppler

References

  1. Clarencon F, Piotin M, Pistocchi S, Babic D, Blanc R (2012) Evaluation of stent visibility by flat panel detector CT in patients treated for intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 54:1121–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosokawa S, Kawai N, Sato M, Minamiguchi H, Nakai M, Nishioku T, Sonomura T, Matsumoto H, Masuo O, Itakura T (2012) Optimal contrast material concentration for distinguishing among carotid artery lumen, carotid stent, and neck in cone-beam computed tomography during carotid angiography: basic and clinical studies. Jpn J Radiol 30:358–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel NV, Gounis MJ, Wakhloo AK, Noordhoek N, Blijd J, Babic D, Takhtani D, Lee SK, Norbash A (2011) Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam CT of cerebrovascular stents: experimental optimization and clinical application. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:137–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stidd DA, Theessen H, Deng Y, Li Y, Scholz B, Rohkohl C, Jhaveri MD, Moftakhar R, Chen M, Lopes DK (2014) Evaluation of a metal artifacts reduction algorithm applied to postinterventional flat panel detector CT imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:2164–2169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caroff J, Mihalea C, Neki H, Ruijters D, Ikka L, Benachour N, Moret J, Spelle L (2014) Role of C-arm VasoCT in the use of endovascular WEB flow disruption in intracranial aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:1353–1357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. ElSankari S, Baledent O, van Pesch V, Sindic C, de Broqueville Q, Duprez T (2013) Concomitant analysis of arterial, venous, and CSF flows using phase-contrast MRI: a quantitative comparison between MS patients and healthy controls. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33:1314–1321

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Radvany MG, Ehtiati T, Huang J, Mahesh M, Gailloud P (2012) Aortic arch injection with C-arm cone beam CT for radiosurgery treatment planning of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 4:e28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira VM, Ouared R, Brina O, Bonnefous O, Satwiaski J, Aerts H, Ruijters D, van Nijnatten F, Perren F, Bijlenga P, Schaller K, Lovblad KO (2014) Quantification of internal carotid artery flow with digital subtraction angiography: validation of an optical flow approach with Doppler ultrasound. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:156–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheel P, Ruge C, Petruch UR, Schoning M (2000) Color duplex measurement of cerebral blood flow volume in healthy adults. Stroke 31:147–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahl A, Russell D, Rootwelt K, Nyberg-Hansen R, Kerty E (1995) Cerebral vasoreactivity assessed with transcranial Doppler and regional cerebral blood flow measurements. Dose, serum concentration, and time course of the response to acetazolamide. Stroke 26:2302–2306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krejza J, Mariak Z, Babikian VL (2001) Importance of angle correction in the measurement of blood flow velocity with transcranial Doppler sonography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1743–1747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manno EM, Gress DR, Schwamm LH, Diringer MN, Ogilvy CS (1998) Effects of induced hypertension on transcranial Doppler ultrasound velocities in patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 29:422–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uematsu S, Yang A, Preziosi TJ, Kouba R, Toung TJ (1983) Measurement of carotid blood flow in man and its clinical application. Stroke 14:256–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical standards and patient consent

We declare that all human and animal studies have been approved by the local Ethics Committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Jeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, K.I., Kim, S.R., Choi, J.H. et al. Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam computed tomography without pre-diluted contrast medium. Neuroradiology 57, 1121–1126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1570-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1570-0

Keywords

Navigation