Skip to main content
Log in

A semi-analytical solution to estimate an effective thermal conductivity of the two-phase building materials with spherical inclusions

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, two dimensional (2D) and three dimensional (3D) semi-analytical models are proposed to estimate an effective thermal conductivity of two-phase building materials with spherical inclusions. The proposed semi-analytical approach is based on the formulation and the solution of a boundary value problem. Further, the solution is coupled with Maxwell’s methodology to estimate effective thermal conductivity. The 2D model is simple and limited in scope while the 3D model is widely applicable and is based on a multipole expansion method. The 3D model incorporates secondary parameters like size distribution, variation in thermal conductivity among the inclusions, particle interaction and statistical spatial distribution. For the 3D model, spherical representative unit cells (SRUC) based on the face-centred cubic arrangement and trimmed spheres at the boundary are proposed. Effective thermal conductivity estimated by the proposed models is compared and validated with experimental results from the literature. The 2D model predicts the thermal conductivity of conventional concrete with reasonable accuracy where the relative error is less than ±12%. The 3D model predicts accurate results for foam concrete with a relative error of less than ±15%. Predictions of thermal conductivity of lightweight concrete by the 3D model are also in good agreement with experimental results. Finally, the comparison of proposed models with models from literature has shown that the incorporation of particle interaction has improved the accuracy of the solution. Thus, the flexibility with SRUC and incorporation of particle interactions make this 3D model widely applicable for building materials with spherical inclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FCC:

face centred cubic

ND:

non-dimensional diameter

RUC:

representative unit cell

SRUC:

spherical representative unit cell

c:

Volume concentration

k :

Thermal conductivity, W/mK

k aggre :

Thermal conductivity of aggregate, W/mK

k e :

Effective thermal conductivity, W/mK

k est :

Estimated effective thermal conductivity, W/mK

k est_2D :

Effective thermal conductivity estimated by 2D model, W/mK

k est_3D :

Effective thermal conductivity estimated by 3D model, W/mK

k exp :

Experimental thermal conductivity, W/mK

k i :

Thermal conductivity of inclusion, W/mK

k mor :

Thermal conductivity of mortar, W/mK

N :

Number of inclusions

n c :

Number of complete inclusions or complete spheres

n inc :

Number of incomplete inclusions or spherical caps

r :

Position vector, m

R eff :

Radius of spherical matrix, m

r i :

Radius of inclusions, m

R q :

Radius of qth inclusion, m

T(r):

Temperature as a function of r, K

T dis :

Local disturbance of temperature, K

T far :

Far field temperature, K

T i :

Temperature in the inclusion, K

T m :

Temperature in the matrix, K

U :

Non-dimensional temperature

U i :

Non-dimensional temperature in the inclusion

U m :

Non-dimensional temperature in the matrix

α:

Ratio of thermal conductivity of inclusion to matrix

α :

Dimensionless effective thermal conductivity

References

  1. Cole RJ, Kernan PC (1996) Life-cycle energy use in office buildings. Build Environ 31:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maxwell JC (1873) A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Rayleigh L (1892) LVI. On the influence of obstacles arranged in rectangular order upon the properties of a medium. Philos Mag Ser 5(34):481–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786449208620364

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell-Allen D, Thorne CP (1963) The thermal conductivity of concrete. Mag Concr Res 15:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Asakuma Y, Yamamoto T (2016) Thermal analysis of porous medium with ellipsoidal pores using a homogenization method. Heat Mass Transf 52:2113–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pia G, Sanna U (2013) A geometrical fractal model for the porosity and thermal conductivity of insulating concrete. Constr Build Mater 44:551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu P, Duan YH, Chen E et al (2018) Microstructure-based fractal models for heat and mass transport properties of cement paste. Int J Heat Mass Transf 126:432–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Ma C, Liu Y et al (2018) A model for the effective thermal conductivity of moist porous building materials based on fractal theory. Int J Heat Mass Transf 125:387–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin H-Q, Yao X-L, Fan L-W et al (2016) Experimental determination and fractal modeling of the effective thermal conductivity of autoclaved aerated concrete: effects of moisture content. Int J Heat Mass Transf 92:589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham ME, Peddicord KL (1981) Heat conduction in spheres packed in an infinite regular cubical array. Int J Heat Mass Transf 24:1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(81)90157-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perrins WT, McKenzie DR, McPhedran RC (1979) Transport properties of regular arrays of cylinders. Proc R Soc London A Math Phys Sci 369:207–225

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Loeb AL (1954) Thermal conductivity: VIII, a theory of thermal conductivity of porous materials. J Am Ceram Soc 37:96–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.1954.tb20107.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz PW (1979) Effective thermal conductivity of packed beds. Am Chem Soc 18:283–286

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bauer TH (1993) A general analytical approach toward the thermal conductivity of porous media. Int J Heat Mass Transf 36:4181–4191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(93)90080-P

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanaun SK, Levin V (2007) Self-consistent methods for composites: Vol. 1: Static problems. Springer Science & Business Media

  16. Sobolev K, Amirjanov A (2010) Application of genetic algorithm for modeling of dense packing of concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 24:1449–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. She W, Zhang Y, Jones MR (2014) Three-dimensional numerical modeling and simulation of the thermal properties of foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 50:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McPhedran RC, McKenzie DR (1978) The conductivity of lattices of spheres I. the simple cubic lattice. Proc R Soc London A Math Phys Sci 359:45–63

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKenzie DR, McPhedran RC, Derrick GH (1978) The conductivity of lattices of spheres-II. The body centred and face centred cubic lattices. Proc R Soc London A Math Phys Sci 362:211–232

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sangani AS, Yao C (1988) Bulk thermal conductivity of composites with spherical inclusions. J Appl Phys 63:1334–1341. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.339960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kushch VI (1994) Thermal conductivity of a composite material reinforced by regularly distributed spheroidal particles. J Eng Phys Thermophys 66:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kushch VI (2013) Micromechanics of composites: multipole expansion approach

  23. Kanaun S (2010) Calculation of electro and thermo static fields in matrix composite materials of regular or random microstructures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2010.06.022

  24. Mogilevskaya S, Kushch V, Koroteeva O, Crouch S (2012) Equivalent inhomogeneity method for evaluating the effective conductivities of isotropic particulate composites. J Mech Mater Struct 7:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu S-Y (1995) The effective thermal conductivities of composites with 2-D arrays of circular and square cylinders. J Compos Mater 29:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang K-T (2007) Mathematical methods for engineers and scientists. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Farlow SJ (1993) Partial differential equations for scientists and engineers. Courier Corporation, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ozisik MN (2002) Boundary value problems of heat conduction. Courier Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCartney LN, Kelly A (2008) Maxwell’s far-field methodology applied to the prediction of properties of multi-phase isotropic particulate composites. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 464:423–446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.0071

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Henning R (2017) Mote3D: an open-source toolbox for modelling periodic random particulate microstructures. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 25:35011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Döge G (2001) Perfect simulation for random sequential adsorption of d-dimensional spheres with random radii. J Stat Comput Simul 69:141–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Segurado J, Llorca J (2002) A numerical approximation to the elastic properties of sphere-reinforced composites. J Mech Phys Solids 50:2107–2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00021-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Karthikeyan P, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Ramu M et al (2018) Effect of primary and secondary parameters on analytical estimation of effective thermal conductivity of two phase materials using unit cell approach. Heat Mass Transf 54:1323–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang W, Min H, Gu X et al (2015) Mesoscale model for thermal conductivity of concrete. Constr Build Mater 98:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan M (2002) Factors affecting the thermal properties of concrete and applicability of its prediction models. Build Environ 37:607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00061-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ollivier JP, Maso JC, Bourdette B (1995) Interfacial transition zone in concrete. Adv Cem Based Mater 2:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei S, Yiqiang C, Yunsheng Z, Jones MR (2013) Characterization and simulation of microstructure and thermal properties of foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 47:1278–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chung S-Y, Elrahman MA, Stephan D, Kamm PH (2018) The influence of different concrete additions on the properties of lightweight concrete evaluated using experimental and numerical approaches. Constr Build Mater 189:314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abd Elrahman M, Chung S-Y, Stephan D (2018) Effect of different expanded aggregates on the properties of lightweight concrete. Mag Concr Res 71:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1962) A variational approach to the theory of the effective magnetic permeability of multiphase materials. J Appl Phys 33:3125–3131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Samantray PK, Karthikeyan P, Reddy KS (2006) Estimating effective thermal conductivity of two-phase materials. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49:4209–4219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.03.015

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Reddy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A - Detailed solution of 2D semi-analytical model

Boundary conditions can be given as

$$ U\left(r,0\right)=0,\kern0.75em U\left(r,\frac{\pi }{2}\right)=0,\kern0.5em U\left({R}_2,\theta \right)=\sin \theta $$
(A.1)
$$ {U}_i\left({R}_1,\theta \right)={U}_m\left({R}_1,\theta \right),\kern1em \frac{\ d{U}_i\left({R}_1,\theta \right)}{dr}=\frac{d{U}_m\left({R}_1,\theta \right)}{dr} $$
(A.2)

Using separation of variables, let

$$ U\left(r,\theta \right)=R(r)\varnothing \left(\theta \right) $$
(A.3)

Substituting Eq. (A.3) in governing equation given in Eq. (1), two separate differential equations are obtained given in Eqs. (A.4) and (A.5),

$$ {r}^2{R}^{\prime \prime (r)}+r{R}^{\prime }(r)+\lambda\ R(r)=0 $$
(A.4)
$$ {\varnothing}^{\prime \prime}\left(\theta \right)-\lambda \varnothing \left(\theta \right)=0 $$
(A.5)

Boundary conditions U(r, 0) = 0 and \( U\left(r,\frac{\pi }{2}\right)=0 \) can be written as,

$$ \varnothing (0)=0;\varnothing \left(\frac{\pi }{2}\right)=0 $$
(A.6)

Equations (A.5) and (A.6) together forms Sturm-Liouville eigen value problem where eigen function ∅(θ) and eigen value λn are given as [26, 27],

$$ \varnothing \left(\uptheta \right)=\mathrm{Sin}2 n\theta; {\lambda}_n=-4{n}^2\ where\ n=1,2,3\dots $$
(A.7)

Equation (A.4) is the Euler-Cauchy equation and solution can be given as [26, 27],

$$ {R}_n(r)=\left({A}_n{r}^{2n}+{B}_n{r}^{-2n}\right) $$
(A.8)

Thus general solution becomes,

$$ U\left(r,\theta \right)=\sum \limits_{n=1}^{n=\infty}\left({A}_n{r}^{2n}+{B}_{\mathrm{n}}{r}^{-2n}\right)\mathit{\sin}\ 2 n\theta $$
(A.9)

For the temperature field in the inclusion, Bn will become zero for the sake of boundedness of the solution. Thus, the temperature field for each component of the system i.e. matrix (Um) and inclusion (Ui) can be given as,

$$ {U}_m\left(r,\theta \right)=\sum \limits_{n=1}^{n=\infty}\left({A}_{nm}{r}^{2n}+{B}_{nm}{r}^{-2n}\right)\mathit{\sin}\ 2 n\theta $$
(A.10)
$$ {U}_i\left(r,\theta \right)=\sum \limits_{n=1}^{n=\infty }{A}_{ni}\ {r}^{2n}\ \mathit{\sin}\ 2 n\theta $$
(A.11)

Orthogonality relations for sine and cosine functions are,

$$ {\int}_{-\frac{\pi }{2}}^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\mathit{\sin}\left(2 n\theta \right)\ \mathit{\sin}\left(2 m\theta \right)\ d\theta =\left\{\begin{array}{c}1\kern2.25em n=m\\ {}0\kern2.25em n\ne m\end{array}\right. $$
(A.12)

Applying boundary condition given in Eq. (A.1) for temperature at boundary r = R2,

$$ \sum \limits_{n=1}^{n=\infty}\left({A}_{nm}{r}^{2n}+{B}_{nm}{r}^{-2n}\right)\mathit{\sin}\ 2 n\theta = sin\theta $$
(A.13)

Multiplying both the sides by Sin(2) and integrating from \( -\frac{\pi }{2} \) to \( \frac{\pi }{2} \),

$$ \left({A}_{nm}{R}_2^{2n}+{B}_{nm}{R}_2^{-2n}\right)=\frac{\int_0^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\sin\ \uptheta \ast \sin 2 n\theta d\theta}{\int_0^{\frac{\pi }{2}}{\left(\sin 2 n\theta \right)}^2\ d\theta}=C $$
(A.14)

Applying boundary conditions given in Eq. (A.2) for temperature and orthogonality property,

$$ \left({A}_{nm}{R}_1^{2n}+{B}_{nm}{R}_1^{-2n}\right)={A}_{ni}\ {R_1}^{2n} $$
(A.15)

Applying boundary condition given in Eq. (A.2) for heat flux and using orthogonality property for sine,

$$ {k}_m\left({A}_{nm}{R}_1^{2n}-{B}_{nm}{R}_1^{-2n}\right)={k}_i{A}_n\ {R_1}^{2n} $$
(A.16)

Appendix B - Regular and irregular solid spherical harmonics respectively and can be given by [22]

$$ {y}_t^s\left(\boldsymbol{r}\right)=\frac{r^t}{\left(t+s\right)!}{P}_t^s\left(\cos \theta \right)\exp \left( is\phi \right);\kern0.5em {Y}_t^s\left(\boldsymbol{r}\right)=\frac{\left(t-s\right)!}{r^{t+1}}\ {P}_t^s\left(\cos \theta \right)\exp \left( is\phi \right)\kern0.75em $$
(B.1)

Where \( {P}_t^s \)are the associated Legendre functions of the first kind of order ‘s’ and degree ‘t’.

Temperature disturbance in terms of solid harmonics for qth inclusion where origin is at the centre of qth inclusion is given as ,

$$ {T}_{dis}^q\left({\boldsymbol{r}}_{\boldsymbol{q}}\right)=\sum \limits_{t=1}^{\infty}\sum \limits_{s=-t}^t{A}_{ts}^{(q)}{Y}_t^s\left({\boldsymbol{r}}_{\boldsymbol{q}}\right) $$
(B.2)

Superposition of temperature disturbance due to all the inclusions with origin at the centre of the qth inclusion is as [22],

$$ \sum \limits_{p\ne q}^N{T}_{dis}^p\left({\boldsymbol{r}}_{\boldsymbol{p}}\right)=\sum \limits_{t=0}^{\infty}\sum \limits_{s=-t}^t{b}_{ts}^{(q)}{y}_t^s\left({\boldsymbol{r}}_{\boldsymbol{q}}\right) $$
(B.3)

Where \( {b}_{ts}^{(q)} \) is given as [22],

$$ {b}_{ts}^{(q)}={\left(-1\right)}^{t+s}\sum \limits_{p\ne q}^N\sum \limits_{k=1}^{\infty}\sum \limits_{l=-k}^k{A}_{kl}^{(p)}{Y}_{k+t}^{l-s}\left({\boldsymbol{R}}_{pq}\right),\kern1.5em {\boldsymbol{R}}_{pq}={\boldsymbol{r}}_{\boldsymbol{p}}-{\boldsymbol{r}}_{\boldsymbol{q}}\kern0.5em $$
(B.4)

Temperature far field Tfar(r) can be expressed in terms of solid harmonics as [22]

$$ {T}_{far}\left(\boldsymbol{r}\right)=\sum \limits_{t=1}^{\infty}\sum \limits_{s=-t}^t{c}_{ts}{y}_t^s\left({\boldsymbol{r}}_{\boldsymbol{q}}\right),\kern0.5em {c}_{ts}=\frac{\left(t+s\right)!}{4\pi {R}^{t+2}{\alpha}_{ts}}\int {T}_{far}\overline{\chi_t^s} dS $$
(B.5)

Appendix C - Relation for effective thermal conductivity in 3D model

According to the boundary condition, far field temperature is linearly varying in z direction. For equivalent inclusion, writing far field temperature in the form of Eq. (B.5),

$$ {T}_{far}=z={c}_{10}{y}_1^0(r), thus\ {c}_{10}=1; $$
(C.1)

Also, the disturbance field for equivalent inclusion which has similar form as given in Eq. (B.2) becomes,

$$ {T}_{dis\_ EI}={A}_{10}^{\ast }{Y}_1^0(r)\kern0.5em $$
(C.2)

Now \( {A}_{10}^{\ast } \) can be obtained by equating temperature disturbance due to cluster of inclusions given in Eq. (16) with temperature disturbance due to equivalent inclusion given in Eq. (C.2)

$$ {A}_{10}^{\ast }=\sum \limits_{n=1}^N{A}_{10}^{(n)} $$
(C.3)

Now for single inclusion problem in case of equivalent inclusion, considering only the terms of the order 1 (t = 1) and degree 0(s = 0), Eq. (17) boils down to following relation, where second term is eliminated,

$$ \frac{\left({\alpha}^{\ast }+2\right)}{\left({\alpha}^{\ast }-1\right)\ast {\left({R}_{eff}\right)}^3}\ {A}_{10}^{\ast }=-{c}_{10},\kern1.25em where\ {\alpha}^{\ast }=\raisebox{1ex}{${k}_e$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{${k}_m$}\right. $$
(C.4)

Thus, relation for effective thermal conductivity can be given from Eqs. (13) and (14) is given as,

$$ {\alpha}^{\ast }=\frac{1-2\mu }{1+\mu },\kern0.75em where\ \mu =\frac{A_{10}^{\ast }}{R_{eff}^3}, $$
(C.5)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patil, P., Reddy, K.S. A semi-analytical solution to estimate an effective thermal conductivity of the two-phase building materials with spherical inclusions. Heat Mass Transfer 56, 3209–3227 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02894-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02894-x

Navigation